让英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）更像凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）。
Making the NHS more like Kaiser Permanente.
作者信息
Light Donald, Dixon Michael
机构信息
Division of Social and Behavioural Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):763-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7442.763.
Abstract
The NHS needs to break down the barriers between primary, secondary, and tertiary care
摘要
英国国民医疗服务体系需要打破初级、二级和三级医疗保健之间的障碍。
相似文献
1
Making the NHS more like Kaiser Permanente.让英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）更像凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):763-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7442.763.
2
Lessons for the NHS from Kaiser Permanente.凯泽医疗集团带给英国国家医疗服务体系的经验教训。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1241-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1241.
3
Learning from Kaiser (part 2). Is integration the answer?向凯撒学习（第二部分）。整合是答案吗？
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Aug;54(505):571-3.
4
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: money should be spent on effective, well documented solutions.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）和凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的医院床位使用情况：资金应投入到有效且有充分记录的解决方案上。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.584-b.
5
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: authors did not compare like with like.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）和凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的医院床位使用率：作者未进行同类比较。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):584; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.584.
6
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: debate about Kaiser needs transparency and hard evidence.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）与凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的病床使用情况：关于凯撒医疗集团的讨论需要透明度和确凿证据。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):583; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.583-a.
7
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: bed management in the NHS can be improved easily.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）和凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的医院病床使用情况：英国国家医疗服务体系的床位管理可以轻松改进。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):582-3; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.582-c.
8
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: ownership, integration, and medical leadership are key.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）和凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的医院床位使用情况：所有权、整合及医疗领导力是关键。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):584-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.584-c.
9
Questioning the claims from Kaiser.质疑凯撒医疗集团的说法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Jun;54(503):415-21; discussion 422.
10
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: quality of care, length of stay, and readmissions need to be considered.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）和凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的病床使用情况：需要考虑医疗质量、住院时间和再入院情况。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):583-4; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.583-b.
引用本文的文献
1
Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Large Integrated US Health System.大型综合性美国医疗体系中肝细胞癌患者的生存结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35066.
2
Evaluating the care of patients with long term conditions.评估慢性病患者的护理情况。
London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2014;6(6):131-5. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2014.11494364.
3
Achieving provider engagement: providers' perceptions of implementing and delivering integrated care.实现医疗服务提供者的参与：医疗服务提供者对实施和提供综合护理的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):1711-20. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549024. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Integrating specialist advice following reforms: an interview-based survey.改革后整合专家建议：一项基于访谈的调查
JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Apr;4(4):24. doi: 10.1177/2042533313476683. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
5
Guidance for structuring team-based incentives in healthcare.医疗机构团队激励机制构建指南
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Feb 1;19(2):e64-70.
6
Something is amiss in Denmark: a comparison of preventable hospitalisations and readmissions for chronic medical conditions in the Danish Healthcare system and Kaiser Permanente.丹麦出现异常情况：丹麦医疗保健系统和 Kaiser Permanente 中可预防的慢性疾病住院和再入院情况比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 22;11:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-347.
7
Assessing the evolution of primary healthcare organizations and their performance (2005-2010) in two regions of Québec province: Montréal and Montérégie.评估魁北克省两个地区（蒙特利尔和蒙泰雷吉）的初级保健组织及其绩效（2005-2010 年）的演变。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Dec 1;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-95.
8
Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system.从临床整合的角度来看，凯撒医疗模式是否更优越？——对凯撒医疗、北加利福尼亚和丹麦医疗体系的比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 8;10:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-91.
9
[Organisational reforms in the relationships between general doctors and specialists: impact on referrals].全科医生与专科医生关系中的组织改革：对转诊的影响
Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 May 15.
10
Mind the gap between policy imperatives and service provision: a qualitative study of the process of respiratory service development in England and Wales.关注政策要求与服务提供之间的差距：对英格兰和威尔士呼吸服务发展过程的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 4;8:248. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-248.
本文引用的文献
1
Can the NHS learn from US managed care organisations?英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）能向美国的管理式医疗组织学习吗？
BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):223-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.223.
2
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS, Kaiser Permanente, and the US Medicare programme: analysis of routine data.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）、凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）及美国医疗保险计划中的医院床位使用情况：常规数据分析
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1257.
3
Out of sight.看不见。
Health Serv J. 2003 Jun 19;113(5860):14-5.
4
Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership.提高卫生服务绩效：临床领导力的作用。
Lancet. 2003 Jun 7;361(9373):1978-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13593-3.
5
Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente.花同样的钱获得更多：英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）与加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团（Kaiser Permanente）的比较。
BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):135-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.135.
6
Intermediate care. A new way through.中级护理。一条全新途径。
Health Serv J. 2000 Aug 10;110(5717):24-5.
7
The two tier syndrome behind waiting lists.候诊名单背后的两级综合征。
BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1349.
Zotero 插件