Lai Chih-Jou, Wang Chih-Pin, Tsai Po-Yi, Chan Rai-Chi, Lin Shan-Hui, Lin Fu-Gong, Hsieh Chin-Yi
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
To identify the effective predictors for therapeutic outcomes based on intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS).
A sham-controlled, double-blind parallel study design.
A tertiary hospital.
People with stroke (N=72) who presented with unilateral hemiplegia.
Ten consecutive sessions of real or sham iTBS were implemented with the aim of enhancing hand function. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to the presence (MEP+) or absence (MEP-) of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and grip strength according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale.
Cortical excitability, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), finger-tapping task (FT), and simple reaction time were performed before and after the sessions.
MEPs and the MRC scale were predictive of iTBS therapeutic outcomes. Group A (MEP+, MRC>1) exhibited the greatest WMFT change (7.6±2.3, P<.001), followed by group B (MEP-, MRC>1; 5.2±2.2 score change) and group C (MEP-, MRC=0; 2.3±1.5 score change). These improvements were correlated significantly with baseline motor function and ipsilesional maximum MEP amplitude.
The effectiveness of iTBS modulation for poststroke motor enhancement depends on baseline hand grip strength and the presence of MEPs. Our findings indicate that establishing neurostimulation strategies based on the proposed electrophysiological and clinical criteria can allow iTBS to be executed with substantial precision. Effective neuromodulatory strategies can be formulated by using electrophysiological features and clinical presentation information as guidelines.
基于间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)确定治疗效果的有效预测指标。
假刺激对照、双盲平行研究设计。
一家三级医院。
患有单侧偏瘫的中风患者(N = 72)。
连续进行10次真正的或假的iTBS治疗,目的是增强手部功能。根据运动诱发电位(MEP)的有无(MEP+或MEP-)以及根据医学研究委员会(MRC)量表的握力,将患者分为4组。
在治疗前后进行皮质兴奋性、Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)、手指敲击任务(FT)和简单反应时间测试。
MEP和MRC量表可预测iTBS的治疗效果。A组(MEP+,MRC>1)的WMFT变化最大(7.6±2.3,P<.001),其次是B组(MEP-,MRC>1;得分变化5.2±2.2)和C组(MEP-,MRC = 0;得分变化2.3±1.5)。这些改善与基线运动功能和患侧最大MEP振幅显著相关。
iTBS调节对中风后运动增强的有效性取决于基线握力和MEP的存在。我们的研究结果表明,基于所提出的电生理和临床标准建立神经刺激策略可以使iTBS的执行具有很高的精确性。可以通过使用电生理特征和临床表现信息作为指导来制定有效的神经调节策略。