• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏移植供体分配中BAR评分的价值与局限性

Value and limitations of the BAR-score for donor allocation in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Schrem Harald, Platsakis Anna-Luise, Kaltenborn Alexander, Koch Armin, Metz Courtney, Barthold Marc, Krauth Christian, Amelung Volker, Braun Felix, Becker Thomas, Klempnauer Jürgen, Reichert Benedikt

机构信息

General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany,

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1247-x. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-014-1247-x
PMID:25218679
Abstract

PURPOSE

The MELD-score was shown to be able to predict 90-day mortality in most patients with end-stage liver disease prior to liver transplantation and is used as a widely accepted measure for transplantation urgency. Prognostic ability of the BAR-score to predict 90-day post-transplant mortality by detection of unfavourable pretransplant combinations of donor and recipient factors may help to better balance urgency versus utility.

METHODS

Two German cohorts (Hannover, n=453; Kiel, n=234) were retrospectively analyzed using ROC-curve analysis, goodness-of-model-fit tests, summary measures and risk-adjusted multivariate binary regression. Included were all consecutive liver transplants performed in adult recipients (minimum age 18 years). Excluded were all combined transplants and living-related organ donor transplants.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted multivariate regression revealed that the BAR-score is an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality after transplantation in both cohorts from Hannover and Kiel combined (p<0.001, OR=1.017, 95% CI:1.031-1.113). The area under the ROC-curve (AUROC) for the prediction of 90-day mortality using the BAR-score was 0.662 (95% CI 0.624-0.699, power>95%). Measures for association between observed 90-day mortality and the predicted probabilities in the combined cohort were concordant in 63.5% with low summary measures (Somers' D test 0.32, Goodman-Kruskal Gamma test 0.34 and Kendall's Tau a test 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The BAR-score performed below accepted thresholds for potentially useful clinical prognostic models. Prognostic models with better predictive ability with AUROCs>0.700, concordance>70% and larger summary measures are required for the prediction of 90-day post-transplant mortality to enable donor organ allocation with reliable weighing of urgency versus utility.

摘要

目的

终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分已被证明能够预测大多数肝移植前终末期肝病患者的90天死亡率,并被用作广泛接受的移植紧迫性衡量指标。通过检测供体和受体因素的不利移植前组合,BAR评分预测移植后90天死亡率的预后能力可能有助于更好地平衡紧迫性与实用性。

方法

使用ROC曲线分析、模型拟合优度检验、汇总指标和风险调整多变量二元回归对两个德国队列(汉诺威,n = 453;基尔,n = 234)进行回顾性分析。纳入所有在成年受者(最小年龄18岁)中进行的连续肝移植。排除所有联合移植和亲属活体器官供体移植。

结果

风险调整多变量回归显示,BAR评分是汉诺威和基尔两个队列联合后移植后90天死亡率的独立危险因素(p<0.001,OR = 1.017,95%CI:1.031 - 1.113)。使用BAR评分预测90天死亡率的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.662(95%CI 0.624 - 0.699,检验效能>95%)。在合并队列中,观察到的90天死亡率与预测概率之间的关联度量在63.5%的情况下是一致的,汇总指标较低(Somers' D检验为0.32,Goodman - Kruskal Gamma检验为0.34,Kendall's Tau a检验为0.07)。

结论

BAR评分低于潜在有用临床预后模型的公认阈值。预测移植后90天死亡率需要具有更好预测能力的预后模型,即AUROCs>0.700、一致性>70%且汇总指标更大,以便在权衡紧迫性与实用性时可靠地分配供体器官。

相似文献

1
Value and limitations of the BAR-score for donor allocation in liver transplantation.肝脏移植供体分配中BAR评分的价值与局限性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1247-x. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
2
The new liver allocation score for transplantation is validated and improved transplant survival benefit in Germany but not in the United Kingdom.用于移植的新肝脏分配评分在德国得到验证,且改善了移植后的生存获益,但在英国并非如此。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Jun;22(6):743-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.24421.
3
Value of the SOFA score as a predictive model for short-term survival in high-risk liver transplant recipients with a pre-transplant labMELD score ≥ 30.SOFA 评分作为移植前 labMELD 评分≥30 的高危肝移植受者短期生存预测模型的价值。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Jun;397(5):717-26. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0881-9. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
4
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems Based on Both Donor and Recipient Characteristics for Predicting Outcome after Living Donor Liver Transplantation.基于供体和受体特征的不同评分系统对活体肝移植术后结局预测的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0136604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136604. eCollection 2015.
5
Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.在肝移植中是否有更好的分配指南?一种针对终末期肝病模型时代的正义和效用的新评分。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):745-53; discussion 753. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182365081.
6
Value of the preoperative SOFT-score, P-SOFT-score, SALT-score and labMELD-score for the prediction of short-term patient and graft survival of high-risk liver transplant recipients with a pre-transplant labMELD-score ≥30.术前SOFT评分、P-SOFT评分、SALT评分及实验室MELD评分对移植前实验室MELD评分≥30的高危肝移植受者短期患者及移植物存活预测的价值
Ann Transplant. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):11-7. doi: 10.12659/aot.883218.
7
The Donor-Risk-Index, ECD-Score and D-MELD-Score all fail to predict short-term outcome after liver transplantation with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.供体风险指数、ECD评分和D-MELD评分均无法以可接受的敏感性和特异性预测肝移植后的短期预后。
Ann Transplant. 2012 Jul-Sep;17(3):5-13. doi: 10.12659/aot.883452.
8
Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score and Derived Variants Lack Prognostic Ability after Liver Transplantation.终末期肝病模型评分及其衍生变体在肝移植后缺乏预后预测能力。
Ann Transplant. 2015 Aug 4;20:441-8. doi: 10.12659/AOT.893967.
9
[The application of MELD score in patients submitted to liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis of survival and the predictive factors in the short and long term].[终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分在肝移植患者中的应用:生存情况及短期和长期预测因素的回顾性分析]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct-Dec;45(4):275-83. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032008000400004.
10
Is Muscle MELD a More Promising Predictor for Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?肌肉MELD评分是否是活体肝移植术后死亡率更有前景的预测指标?
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):213-219. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781571. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
BAR Score Performance in Predicting Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.BAR 评分在预测活体肝移植术后生存中的表现:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb 18;2022:2877859. doi: 10.1155/2022/2877859. eCollection 2022.
2
The Graz Liver Allocation Strategy-Impact of Extended Criteria Grafts on Outcome Considering Immunological Aspects.格拉茨肝脏分配策略——考虑免疫因素的扩展标准供肝对结局的影响。
Front Immunol. 2020 Aug 4;11:1584. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01584. eCollection 2020.
3
Predictive Capacity of Risk Models in Liver Transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.具有竞争风险的预后模型的一致性
Biostatistics. 2014 Jul;15(3):526-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt059. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
2
Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.欧洲移植供体风险指数在肝移植中的预后局限性
J Negat Results Biomed. 2013 Dec 24;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-12-18.
3
When to consider liver transplant during the management of chronic liver disease.何时考虑在慢性肝病的管理中进行肝移植。
肝移植中风险模型的预测能力
Transplant Direct. 2019 May 22;5(6):e457. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000896. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.不同临床评分系统在评估原位肝移植术后短期和长期预后中的潜在价值和局限性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214221. eCollection 2019.
5
Liver transplantation for critically ill cirrhotic patients: Overview and pragmatic proposals.肝移植治疗危重症肝硬化患者:概述与实用建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec 14;24(46):5203-5214. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5203.
6
Use of BAR score as predictor of short and long-term survival of liver transplantation patients.使用BAR评分作为肝移植患者短期和长期生存的预测指标。
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jan;9(1):3-4. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9587-8. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
Med Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;98(1):153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
4
Liver transplantation: an appraisal of the present situation.肝移植:现状评估。
Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):164-9. doi: 10.1159/000347213. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
5
Organ transplantation in Germany: regulating scandals and scandalous regulation.德国的器官移植:规范丑闻与丑闻性规范
Eur J Health Law. 2013 Apr;20(2):113-6. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341261.
6
Germany: Avoid more organ transplant scandals.德国:避免更多器官移植丑闻。
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):37. doi: 10.1038/498037b.
7
Respiratory risk score for the prediction of 3-month mortality and prolonged ventilation after liver transplantation.用于预测肝移植后 3 个月死亡率和延长通气时间的呼吸风险评分。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Aug;19(8):862-71. doi: 10.1002/lt.23673. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
Balancing utility and need by means of donor-to-recipient matching: a challenging problem.通过供体与受体匹配来平衡效用和需求:一个具有挑战性的问题。
Am J Transplant. 2013 Feb;13(2):522-3. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12031. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
9
The use of fatty liver grafts in modern allocation systems: risk assessment by the balance of risk (BAR) score.现代分配系统中使用脂肪肝供肝:风险评估的平衡风险(BAR)评分。
Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):861-8; discussion 868-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318272dea2.
10
The Donor-Risk-Index, ECD-Score and D-MELD-Score all fail to predict short-term outcome after liver transplantation with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.供体风险指数、ECD评分和D-MELD评分均无法以可接受的敏感性和特异性预测肝移植后的短期预后。
Ann Transplant. 2012 Jul-Sep;17(3):5-13. doi: 10.12659/aot.883452.