• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BAR 评分在预测活体肝移植术后生存中的表现:一项单中心回顾性研究。

BAR Score Performance in Predicting Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Kom, Egypt.

Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Kom, Egypt.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb 18;2022:2877859. doi: 10.1155/2022/2877859. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/2877859
PMID:35223683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8881181/
Abstract

METHODS

146 adult liver transplant recipients were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the independent predictors of survival at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the BAR score was plotted, and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was calculated. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to compare survival above and below the best cutoff values.

RESULTS

The mean age was 52.45 ± 8.54 years, and 59.6% were males. The survival rates were 89, 78.8, and 72% at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively. The BAR score demonstrated a clinically significant value in the prediction of 3-month (AUROC = 0.89), 1-year (AUROC = 0.76), and 5-year survival (AUROC = 0.71). Among the investigated factors associated with survival, BAR score <10 points was the only independent predictor of 3-month (OR 7.34, < 0.0001), 1-year (OR 3.37, =0.001), and 5-year survival (OR 2.83, =0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

BAR is a simple and easily applicable scoring system that could significantly predict short- and long-term survival after LDLT. A large multicenter study is warranted to validate our results in the Egyptian population.

摘要

方法

共纳入 146 例成人肝移植受者。采用单因素和多因素分析确定 3 个月、1 年和 5 年生存率的独立预测因素。绘制 BAR 评分的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算 ROC 曲线下面积(AUROC)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩检验用于比较最佳截止值以上和以下的生存率。

结果

平均年龄为 52.45±8.54 岁,男性占 59.6%。3 个月、1 年和 5 年的生存率分别为 89%、78.8%和 72%。BAR 评分在预测 3 个月(AUROC=0.89)、1 年(AUROC=0.76)和 5 年生存率(AUROC=0.71)方面具有显著的临床价值。在所研究的与生存相关的因素中,BAR 评分<10 分是 3 个月(OR 7.34,<0.0001)、1 年(OR 3.37,=0.001)和 5 年生存率(OR 2.83,=0.044)的唯一独立预测因素。

结论

BAR 是一种简单且易于应用的评分系统,可显著预测 LDLT 后短期和长期生存率。需要进行大型多中心研究,以验证我们在埃及人群中的结果。

相似文献

1
BAR Score Performance in Predicting Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.BAR 评分在预测活体肝移植术后生存中的表现:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb 18;2022:2877859. doi: 10.1155/2022/2877859. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems Based on Both Donor and Recipient Characteristics for Predicting Outcome after Living Donor Liver Transplantation.基于供体和受体特征的不同评分系统对活体肝移植术后结局预测的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0136604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136604. eCollection 2015.
3
Accuracy of the BAR score in the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.BAR 评分预测肝移植术后生存率的准确性。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Is Muscle MELD a More Promising Predictor for Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?肌肉MELD评分是否是活体肝移植术后死亡率更有前景的预测指标?
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):213-219. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781571. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
5
Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients.BAR评分作为肝移植患者短期和长期生存预测指标的应用。
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jan;9(1):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9563-3. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
6
Different Score Systems to Predict Mortality in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Which Is the Winner? The Experience of an Egyptian Center for Living Donor Liver Transplantation.预测活体肝移植死亡率的不同评分系统:哪一个是最佳的?埃及一家活体肝移植中心的经验。
Transplant Proc. 2015 Dec;47(10):2897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.022.
7
Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.不同临床评分系统在评估原位肝移植术后短期和长期预后中的潜在价值和局限性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214221. eCollection 2019.
8
Application of postoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scoring system for evaluating liver graft function after living donor liver transplantation.应用终末期肝病术后评分系统评估活体肝移植术后肝移植肝功能。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Jan-Feb;46(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.09.034.
9
Five-year native liver survival analysis in biliary atresia from a single large Chinese center: The death/liver transplantation hazard change and the importance of rapid early clearance of jaundice.单一大中华中心胆道闭锁的 5 年固有肝存活率分析:死亡/肝移植风险变化及早期快速消退黄疸的重要性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug;54(8):1680-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Validation and performance of three scoring systems for predicting primary non-function and early allograft failure after liver transplantation.三种评分系统预测肝移植后原发性无功能和早期移植物失败的验证和性能。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2024 Oct;23(5):463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiology and health assessment, risk balance, and model for end-stage liver disease scores: Postoperative outcome of liver transplantation.生理学与健康评估、风险平衡以及终末期肝病评分模型:肝移植术后结局
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):95899. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.95899.
2
Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes: A multivariate analysis and comparative study.供体年龄对肝移植结局的影响:多因素分析与比较研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):331-344. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.331.
3
The BAR Score Predicts and Stratifies Outcomes Following Liver Retransplantation: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
BAR, SOFT AND DRI POST-HEPATIC TRANSPLANTATION: WHAT IS THE BEST FOR SURVIVAL ANALYSIS?肝移植术后软、硬胆管狭窄的生存分析:哪种方法最好?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 Jun 11;34(1):e1576. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210001e1576. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictive Capacity of Risk Models in Liver Transplantation.肝移植中风险模型的预测能力
Transplant Direct. 2019 May 22;5(6):e457. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000896. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Accuracy of the BAR score in the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.BAR 评分预测肝移植术后生存率的准确性。
BAR 评分可预测和分层肝移植后结局:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jan 16;37:12104. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12104. eCollection 2024.
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.不同临床评分系统在评估原位肝移植术后短期和长期预后中的潜在价值和局限性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214221. eCollection 2019.
5
Predictors of Mortality in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.活体肝移植受者的死亡预测因素
Transplant Proc. 2017 Jul-Aug;49(6):1376-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.055.
6
High MELD score and extended operating time predict prolonged initial ICU stay after liver transplantation and influence the outcome.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和延长的手术时间预示着肝移植术后最初入住重症监护病房(ICU)的时间延长,并影响预后。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174173. eCollection 2017.
7
Survival outcomes scores (SOFT, BAR, and Pedi-SOFT) are accurate in predicting post-liver transplant survival in adolescents.生存结局评分(SOFT、BAR和儿童SOFT)在预测青少年肝移植后的生存情况方面是准确的。
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Sep;20(6):807-12. doi: 10.1111/petr.12770. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
8
Living donor liver transplantation in Egypt.埃及的活体供肝肝移植
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Apr;5(2):98-106. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.10.03.
9
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems Based on Both Donor and Recipient Characteristics for Predicting Outcome after Living Donor Liver Transplantation.基于供体和受体特征的不同评分系统对活体肝移植术后结局预测的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0136604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136604. eCollection 2015.
10
Who is too healthy and who is too sick for liver transplantation: external validation of prognostic scores and survival-benefit estimation.谁对于肝移植来说健康状况太好,谁又病得太重:预后评分的外部验证及生存获益估计
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(9):1144-51. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1028992. Epub 2015 Apr 11.