Gabbert Silke, Scheringer Martin, Ng Carla A, Stolzenberg Hans-Christian
Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Hollandseweg 1, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.
ETH Zürich, Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
Under the European chemicals' legislation, REACH, substances that are identified to be of "very high concern" will de facto be removed from the market unless the European Commission grants authorisations permitting specific uses. Companies who apply for an authorisation without demonstrating "adequate control" of the risks have to show by means of a socio-economic analysis (SEA) that positive impacts of use outweigh negative impacts for human health and ecosystems. This paper identifies core challenges where further in-depth guidance is urgently required in order to ensure that a SEA can deliver meaningful results and that it can effectively support decision-making on authorisation. In particular, we emphasise the need (i) to better guide the selection of tools for impact assessment, (ii) to explicitly account for stock pollution effects in impact assessments for persistent and very persistent chemicals, (iii) to define suitable impact indicators for PBT/vPvB chemicals given the lack of reliable information about safe concentration levels, (iv) to guide how impacts can be transformed into values for decision-making, and (v) to provide a well-balanced discussion of discounting of long-term impacts of chemicals.
根据欧洲化学品法规《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制》(REACH),被认定为“高度关注”的物质实际上将被禁止进入市场,除非欧盟委员会给予特定用途的授权。申请授权但未证明对风险进行“充分控制”的公司,必须通过社会经济分析(SEA)表明,使用该物质对人类健康和生态系统的积极影响大于负面影响。本文确定了一些核心挑战,迫切需要进一步深入指导,以确保社会经济分析能够产生有意义的结果,并能有效地支持授权决策。特别是,我们强调需要:(i)更好地指导影响评估工具的选择;(ii)在对持久性和极持久性化学品的影响评估中明确考虑库存污染影响;(iii)鉴于缺乏关于安全浓度水平的可靠信息,为持久性、生物累积性和毒性/高持久性、高生物累积性(PBT/vPvB)化学品定义合适的影响指标;(iv)指导如何将影响转化为决策价值;(v)对化学品长期影响的贴现进行全面平衡的讨论。