Lazareva Olga F, Kandray Kaitlyn, Acerbo Martin J
Department of Psychology, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa.
Hippocampus. 2015 Feb;25(2):219-26. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22366. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
A typical nonverbal transitive inference task (TI) consists of several overlapping discriminations (A+ B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, D+ E-, where letters indicate stimuli and pluses and minuses denote reinforcement and nonreinforcement). A choice of stimulus B in a novel pair BD is interpreted as indicative of a TI (if B > C and C > D, then B > D). Although hippocampus has been implicated in nonverbal TI, it is not clear whether it simply maintains memory of associative values or stores an ordered representation of stimuli. We investigated the effect of hippocampal lesion on TI in pigeons while controlling reinforcement history so that reliance on associative values would lead to a choice of a stimulus D in the pair BD instead of a choice of a stimulus B expected by inferential mechanisms. Prior to the lesion, some of the pigeons (relational group; n = 4) have selected B over D indicating TI, while other birds (associative group; n = 6) chose D over B suggesting reliance on associative values. Hippocampal lesion had no effect on postlesion performance in associative group. In contrast, the relational group that preferred stimulus B in a pair BD before lesion showed a near-chance performance after the lesion. Our results demonstrate that hippocampus may be involved in creating a representation of an ordered series of the stimuli instead of maintaining reinforcement history of each stimulus. In addition, we provide a behavioral procedure suitable for dissociating different behavioral strategies used to solving TI task. Finally, we show for the first time the involvement of avian hippocampus in the task that is not explicitly spatial in nature. These results further confirm the notion that avian hippocampus is functionally analogous to mammalian hippocampus despite the significant differences in their anatomy.
一个典型的非语言传递性推理任务(TI)由几个重叠的辨别组成(A+ B-,B+ C-,C+ D-,D+ E-,其中字母表示刺激,加号和减号分别表示强化和非强化)。在新的BD对中选择刺激B被解释为TI的表现(如果B > C且C > D,那么B > D)。尽管海马体与非语言TI有关,但尚不清楚它是仅仅维持联想值的记忆还是存储刺激的有序表征。我们研究了海马体损伤对鸽子TI的影响,同时控制强化历史,以便依赖联想值会导致在BD对中选择刺激D,而不是推理机制预期的选择刺激B。在损伤之前,一些鸽子(关系组;n = 4)在BD对中选择B而非D,表明存在TI,而其他鸟类(联想组;n = 6)选择D而非B,表明依赖联想值。海马体损伤对联想组损伤后的表现没有影响。相比之下,损伤前在BD对中偏好刺激B的关系组在损伤后表现出接近随机的表现。我们的结果表明,海马体可能参与创建刺激的有序系列表征,而不是维持每个刺激的强化历史。此外,我们提供了一种行为程序,适用于区分用于解决TI任务的不同行为策略。最后,我们首次表明鸟类海马体参与了本质上并非明确空间的任务。这些结果进一步证实了这样一种观点,即尽管鸟类和哺乳动物的海马体在解剖结构上存在显著差异,但在功能上是类似的。