• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沟通偏好会调节一种针对性干预措施对提高非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查率的效果。

Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

作者信息

Resnicow Ken, Zhou Yan, Hawley Sarah, Jimbo Masahito, Ruffin Mack T, Davis Rachel E, Shires Deirdre, Lafata Jennifer Elston

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, Ann Arbor, USA.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.013
PMID:25224317
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6208142/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Test the impact of tailoring CRC screening messages for African Americans (AAs) using novel theoretical variables and to examine moderating effect of communication preferences.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to receive two minimally tailored or two enhanced tailored print newsletters addressing CRC. The enhanced intervention was tailored on Self-Determination Theory and other novel psychological constructs. Minimal tailoring only used information available in the patient's EHR. The primary outcome was CRC screening based on EHR. Participants were AA members aged 50-74 of an integrated health care delivery system not up to date on CRC screening.

RESULTS

We enrolled 881 participants. CRC screening participation rates at 1-year follow up were 20.5% and 21.5% in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups, respectively. Communication preferences moderated the impact of the intervention. Specifically, among those with an autonomous communication preference, screening rates in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups were 17.1% and 25.9%, respectively, while no intervention effect was evident among those with a directive preference.

CONCLUSION

Future research is needed to explore the impact of communication preference tailoring for other health behaviors and among other populations.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Tailored communications should consider communication style preference to help guide the content and tone of messages.

摘要

目的

使用新的理论变量测试为非裔美国人(AA)量身定制结直肠癌(CRC)筛查信息的影响,并检验沟通偏好的调节作用。

方法

参与者被随机分为两组,分别接收两份针对CRC的最低限度量身定制或两份强化量身定制的印刷时事通讯。强化干预是根据自我决定理论和其他新的心理结构量身定制的。最低限度的量身定制仅使用患者电子健康记录(EHR)中可用的信息。主要结局是基于EHR的CRC筛查。参与者是综合医疗保健系统中年龄在50 - 74岁且未进行CRC筛查的AA成员。

结果

我们招募了881名参与者。在1年随访时,最低限度量身定制组和强化量身定制组的CRC筛查参与率分别为20.5%和21.5%。沟通偏好调节了干预的影响。具体而言,在具有自主沟通偏好的人群中,最低限度量身定制组和强化量身定制组的筛查率分别为17.1%和25.9%,而在具有指令性偏好的人群中未观察到干预效果。

结论

未来需要进行研究,以探索针对其他健康行为和其他人群量身定制沟通偏好的影响。

实践意义

量身定制的沟通应考虑沟通风格偏好,以帮助指导信息的内容和语气。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/6208142/db6fd94fe84b/nihms625555f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/6208142/db6fd94fe84b/nihms625555f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/6208142/db6fd94fe84b/nihms625555f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.沟通偏好会调节一种针对性干预措施对提高非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查率的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
2
A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives.一项关于两种印刷干预措施以提高一级亲属结肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication.非裔美国教会成员的结直肠癌筛查:患者与医护人员沟通的定性和定量研究
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 15;4:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-62.
4
Effects of tailored knowledge enhancement on colorectal cancer screening preference across ethnic and language groups.个体化知识增强对不同族裔和语言群体结直肠癌筛查偏好的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
5
A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.一种比较印刷品和网络通讯在结直肠癌筛查中的随机对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):122-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1017.
6
Gain versus loss-framed messaging and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: A preliminary examination of perceived racism and culturally targeted dual messaging.得失框架信息传递与非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查:对感知种族主义和文化针对性双重信息传递的初步考察。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):249-67. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12160. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
Biological, psychological and behavioral, and social variables influencing colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.影响非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的生物学、心理与行为以及社会变量。
Nurs Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;58(5):312-20. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ac143d.
8
Addressing Low Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans: Using Focus Groups to Inform the Development of Effective Interventions.解决非裔美国人低水平的结直肠癌筛查问题:利用焦点小组来为有效干预措施的制定提供信息。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep;31(3):567-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0842-z.
9
Colorectal cancer screening preferences among African Americans: which screening test is preferred?非裔美国人对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:哪种筛查测试更受青睐?
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Dec;25(4):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0081-2.
10
Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.评估教育干预对非裔美国人社区增加 CRC 筛查率的影响:一项初步研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Oct;21(10):1685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9597-3. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.美国结直肠癌筛查的流行率和预测因素:来自 2018 年至 2020 年 HINTS 数据库的证据。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01795-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
2
Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial.利用电子健康记录进行实践整合型面向患者的干预措施时的机遇与挑战:e-Assist 结肠健康随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):985-998. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221104094. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012.生命体征:2012 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
2
Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.将男性健康和男子气概理论相结合,以解释大肠癌筛查行为。
Am J Mens Health. 2014 Jan;8(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/1557988313492171. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
3
"It's up to you and God": understanding health behavior change in older African American survivors of colorectal cancer.
Message Frame-Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing.
数字健康通信中的信息框架定制:干预措施重新设计与可用性测试。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 21;6(4):e33886. doi: 10.2196/33886.
4
Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者导向信息传递对结直肠癌筛查的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4529.
5
Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.沟通风险以促进结直肠癌筛查:一项多方法研究,以测试定制与靶向信息策略。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Mar 24;37(2):79-93. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac002.
6
The Relationship between Future Anxiety Due to COVID-19 and Vigilance: The Role of Message Fatigue and Autonomy Satisfaction.2019年冠状病毒病引发的未来焦虑与警觉性之间的关系:信息疲劳和自主满意度的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031062.
7
Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom.医疗保健中的共享决策制定:为什么它有效以及对谁有效的理论视角。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):755-764. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211058068. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis.提高非裔美国男性结直肠癌筛查参与度的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238354. eCollection 2020.
9
Effectiveness of Message Frame-Tailoring in a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的戒烟项目中信息框架定制的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 3;22(4):e17251. doi: 10.2196/17251.
10
Customization in mobile health apps: explaining effects on physical activity intentions by the need for autonomy.移动健康应用程序中的定制化:通过自主性需求解释对身体活动意图的影响。
Digit Health. 2019 Nov 10;5:2055207619888074. doi: 10.1177/2055207619888074. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
“这取决于你和上帝”:理解老年非裔美国结直肠癌幸存者的健康行为改变
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Mar;3(1):94-103. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0188-6.
4
A pilot evaluation of the efficacy of a couple-tailored print intervention on colorectal cancer screening practices among non-adherent couples.一种针对非依从性夫妇的基于夫妇的印刷干预措施对结直肠癌筛查实践的疗效的初步评估。
Psychol Health. 2013;28(9):1046-65. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.781601. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
5
Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.促进结直肠癌筛查讨论:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.032.
6
A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening.一项针对结直肠癌筛查的个体化导航与标准干预的随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Jan;22(1):109-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0701. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
7
Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans.计算机化定制干预可提高非裔美国人结肠癌筛查知识和健康信念。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Oct;27(5):868-85. doi: 10.1093/her/cys094. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
8
Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.改善少数民族与结直肠癌相关的护理干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1033-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2044-2.
9
Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010.2010年美国成年人结直肠癌筛查普及率——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Suppl. 2012 Jun 15;61(2):51-6.
10
Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle.朝着将自我决定理论和动机性访谈进行系统性整合的方向发展:自主性或意志作为基本理论原则——以上二者分别是自上而下和自下而上干预措施发展的范例。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Mar 2;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-23.