Janssens Annelies, Goossens Luc, Van Den Noortgate Wim, Colpin Hilde, Verschueren Karine, Van Leeuwen Karla
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Assessment. 2015 Aug;22(4):473-89. doi: 10.1177/1073191114550477. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
Uncertainty persists regarding adequate measurement of parenting behavior during early adolescence. The present study aimed to clarify the conceptual structure of parenting by evaluating three different models that include support, psychological control, and various types of behavioral control (i.e., proactive, punitive, and harsh punitive control). Furthermore, we examined measurement invariance of parenting ratings by 1,111 Flemish adolescents from Grade 7 till 9, their mother, and father. Finally, criterion validity of parenting ratings was estimated in relation to adolescent problem behavior. Results supported a five-factor parenting model indicating multiple aspects of behavioral control, with punitive and harsh punitive control as more intrusive forms and proactive control as a more supportive form. Similar constructs were measured for adolescents, mothers, and fathers (i.e., configural and metric invariance), however on a different scale (i.e., scalar noninvariance). Future research and clinical practices should acknowledge these findings in order to fully grasp the parenting process.
关于青春期早期养育行为的充分测量仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在通过评估三种不同模型来阐明养育的概念结构,这些模型包括支持、心理控制和各种类型的行为控制(即积极控制、惩罚性控制和严厉惩罚性控制)。此外,我们考察了1111名佛兰芒青少年(从七年级到九年级)及其母亲和父亲对养育评分的测量不变性。最后,估计了养育评分与青少年问题行为相关的效标效度。结果支持了一个五因素养育模型,该模型表明了行为控制的多个方面,惩罚性和严厉惩罚性控制是更具侵入性的形式,而积极控制是更具支持性的形式。青少年、母亲和父亲测量了相似的结构(即构型和度量不变性),但尺度不同(即标量非不变性)。未来的研究和临床实践应认识到这些发现,以便充分理解养育过程。