Suppr超能文献

格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动评分及瞳孔反应对预测创伤性脑损伤患者6个月死亡率的研究:现场评估与入院评估的比较

Glasgow coma scale motor score and pupillary reaction to predict six-month mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: comparison of field and admission assessment.

作者信息

Majdan Marek, Steyerberg Ewout W, Nieboer Daan, Mauritz Walter, Rusnak Martin, Lingsma Hester F

机构信息

1 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University , Trnava, Slovakia .

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jan 15;32(2):101-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3438. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupillary reactivity are well-known prognostic factors in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to compare the GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at hospital admission and assess their prognostic value for 6-month mortality in patients with moderate or severe TBI. We studied 445 patients with moderate or severe TBI from Austria enrolled to hospital in 2009-2012. The area under the curve (AUC) and Nagelkerke's R(2) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at admission. Uni- and multi-variable analyses-adjusting for age, other clinical, and computed tomography findings-were performed using combinations of field and admission GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity. Motor scores generally deteriorated from the field to admission, whereas pupillary reactivity was similar. GCS motor score assessed in field (AUC=0.754; R(2)=0.273) and pupillary assessment at admission (AUC=0.662; R(2)=0.214) performed best as predictors of 6-month mortality in the univariate analysis. This combination also showed best performance in the adjusted analyses (AUC=0.876; R(2)=0.508), but the performance of both predictors assessed at admission was not much worse (AUC=0.857; R(2)=0.460). Field GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity at hospital admission, compared to other combinations of these parameters, possess the best prognostic value to predict 6-month mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Given that differences in prognostic performance are only small, both the field and admission values of GCS motor score and pupillary reaction may be reasonable to use in multi-variable prediction models to predict 6-month outcome.

摘要

格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和瞳孔反应性是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中众所周知的预后因素。本研究的目的是比较在现场和入院时评估的GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应性,并评估它们对中度或重度TBI患者6个月死亡率的预后价值。我们研究了2009年至2012年从奥地利入院的445例中度或重度TBI患者。曲线下面积(AUC)和Nagelkerke's R²用于评估现场和入院时评估的GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应性的预测能力。使用现场和入院时的GCS运动评分及瞳孔反应性的组合进行单变量和多变量分析,并对年龄、其他临床和计算机断层扫描结果进行校正。运动评分通常从现场到入院时恶化,而瞳孔反应性相似。在单变量分析中,现场评估的GCS运动评分(AUC = 0.754;R² = 0.273)和入院时的瞳孔评估(AUC = 0.662;R² = 0.214)作为6个月死亡率的预测指标表现最佳。这种组合在校正分析中也表现最佳(AUC = 0.876;R² = 0.508),但入院时评估的两个预测指标的表现也不太差(AUC = 0.857;R² = 0.460)。与这些参数的其他组合相比,现场GCS运动评分和入院时的瞳孔反应性对预测中度至重度TBI患者的6个月死亡率具有最佳预后价值。鉴于预后表现的差异很小,GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应的现场值和入院值在多变量预测模型中用于预测6个月结局可能都是合理的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
The Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment by Neurotrauma Specialists.神经创伤专家治疗创伤性脑损伤的疗效
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Mar 21;20(1):8-16. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e12. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验