Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 12;14:261. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0261-4.
Socioeconomic status has important associations with disease-specific mortality in the general population. Although individuals with Severe Mental Illnesses (SMI) experience significant premature mortality, the relationship between socioeconomic status and mortality in this group remains under investigated. We aimed to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on rate and cause of death in individuals with SMI (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) relative to the local (Glasgow) and wider (Scottish) populations.
Cause and age of death during 2006-2010 inclusive for individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder registered on the Glasgow Psychosis Clinical Information System (PsyCIS) were obtained by linkage to the Scottish General Register Office (GRO). Rate and cause of death by socioeconomic status, measured by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), were compared to the Glasgow and Scottish populations.
Death rates were higher in people with SMI across all socioeconomic quintiles compared to the Glasgow and Scottish populations, and persisted when suicide was excluded. Differences were largest in the most deprived quintile (794.6 per 10,000 population vs. 274.7 and 252.4 for Glasgow and Scotland respectively). Cause of death varied by socioeconomic status. For those living in the most deprived quintile, higher drug-related deaths occurred in those with SMI compared to local Glasgow and wider Scottish population rates (12.3% vs. 5.9%, p = <0.001 and 5.1% p = 0.002 respectively). A lower proportion of deaths due to cancer in those with SMI living in the most deprived quintile were also observed, relative to the local Glasgow and wider Scottish populations (12.3% vs. 25.1% p = 0.013 and 26.3% p = <0.001). The proportion of suicides was significantly higher in those with SMI living in the more affluent quintiles relative to Glasgow and Scotland (54.6% vs. 5.8%, p = <0.001 and 5.5%, p = <0.001).
Excess mortality in those with SMI occurred across all socioeconomic quintiles compared to the Glasgow and Scottish populations but was most marked in the most deprived quintiles when suicide was excluded as a cause of death. Further work assessing the impact of socioeconomic status on specific causes of premature mortality in SMI is needed.
社会经济地位与普通人群的特定疾病死亡率有重要关联。尽管患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体经历显著的过早死亡,但该人群的社会经济地位与死亡率之间的关系仍未得到充分研究。我们旨在评估社会经济地位对 SMI(精神分裂症和双相情感障碍)个体的死亡率和死因的影响,相对于当地(格拉斯哥)和更广泛的(苏格兰)人群。
通过与苏格兰通用登记处(GRO)链接,获得 2006-2010 年期间在格拉斯哥精神病临床信息系统(PsyCIS)登记的精神分裂症或双相情感障碍个体的死因和年龄。按苏格兰多因素剥夺指数(SIMD)衡量的社会经济地位的死亡率和死因与格拉斯哥和苏格兰人群进行比较。
在所有社会经济五分位组中,SMI 患者的死亡率均高于格拉斯哥和苏格兰人群,且在排除自杀作为死因后仍持续存在。在最贫困五分位组中差异最大(每 10000 人中有 794.6 人死亡,而格拉斯哥和苏格兰分别为 274.7 和 252.4)。死因因社会经济地位而异。在最贫困五分位组中,SMI 患者的药物相关死亡人数高于当地格拉斯哥和更广泛的苏格兰人群(12.3%比 5.9%,p <0.001 和 5.1%,p = 0.002)。在最贫困五分位组中,SMI 患者的癌症相关死亡人数也低于当地格拉斯哥和更广泛的苏格兰人群(12.3%比 25.1%,p = 0.013 和 26.3%,p <0.001)。与格拉斯哥和苏格兰相比,生活在较富裕五分位组的 SMI 患者的自杀比例明显更高(54.6%比 5.8%,p <0.001 和 5.5%,p <0.001)。
与格拉斯哥和苏格兰人群相比,SMI 患者在所有社会经济五分位组中都存在过度死亡,但在排除自杀作为死因时,最贫困五分位组的死亡情况最为明显。需要进一步研究社会经济地位对 SMI 患者过早死亡的特定原因的影响。