Al-Hindi Adel A, Al-Akhfash Ali A, Fareed Abdulbaset M, Alhusainan Khalid S, Algasomy Salih F, Althowainy Ibrahim R
Planning & Development Department, Maternity and Children's Hospital, PO Box 4230, Buraidah 51491, Al-Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.
Saudi Med J. 2014 Sep;35(9):999-1004.
To evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of the pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Ped-CTAS) for children visiting the pediatric emergency department (ED).
This cross-sectional study evaluated all children presented to the ED during a 9-day period in March 2010. The Ped-CTAS triage system was used. Triage performance was analyzed on the basis of quality indicators, rate of admissions, rate of referral, observation duration, and relationship between investigations requested and CTAS level.
During the study period, 3,337 patients were triaged. Overall, 4 patients (0.1%) were in triage level 1, 356 (12%) were level 2, 655 (22%) were level 3, 1810 (60%) were level 4, and 189 (6%) were level 5. The left without being seen rate was 6.25%. A triage duration of 5 minutes or less was carried out for 97% of cases. Within the CTAS time objectives, the waiting time to nurse and physician was 100% for cases triaged to level 1. The proportion of cases who needed observation was 100% for level 1, 85% for level 2, 53% for level 3, 33% for level 4, and 26% for level 5. The proportion of patients admitted to the hospital was 100% for level 1. The lower the level (more acute and emergent the condition) the more use of the laboratory and radiological investigations.
The pediatric CTAS triage system is a good tool for categorizing pediatric patients attending the ED. Stratified by triage level, triage indicators can be used as indicators of ED performance.
评估在儿科急诊科就诊的儿童实施加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表(Ped-CTAS)的有效性。
这项横断面研究评估了 2010 年 3 月为期 9 天期间在急诊科就诊的所有儿童。采用 Ped-CTAS 分诊系统。根据质量指标、入院率、转诊率、观察时长以及所要求的检查与 CTAS 级别之间的关系对分诊表现进行分析。
在研究期间,对 3337 名患者进行了分诊。总体而言,4 名患者(0.1%)处于分诊 1 级,356 名(12%)为 2 级,655 名(22%)为 3 级,1810 名(60%)为 4 级,189 名(6%)为 5 级。未就诊即离开的比率为 6.25%。97%的病例分诊时长为 5 分钟或更短。在 CTAS 时间目标范围内,分诊至 1 级的病例见到护士和医生的等待时间为 100%。需要观察的病例比例在 1 级为 100%,2 级为 85%,3 级为 53%,4 级为 33%,5 级为 26%。1 级患者入院比例为 100%。级别越低(病情越急越紧急),实验室检查和影像学检查的使用就越多。
儿科 CTAS 分诊系统是对到急诊科就诊的儿科患者进行分类的良好工具。按分诊级别分层,分诊指标可作为急诊科表现的指标。