Collage of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pediatrics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00541-0.
Emergency care continues to be a challenge, since patients' arrival is unscheduled and could occur at the same time which may fill the Emergency Department with non-urgent patients. Triaging is an integral part of every busy ED. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is considered an accurate tool to be used outside Canada. This study aims to identify the chosen triage level and compare the variation between registered nurses, pediatric and adult emergency residents by using CTAS cases.
This study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City,Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire was used, and which contains 15 case scenarios with different triage levels. All cases were adopted from a Canadian triage course after receiving permission. Each case provides the patient's symptoms, clinical signs and mode of arrival to the ED. The participants were instructed to assign a triage level using the following scale. A non-random sampling technique was used for this study. The rates of agreement between residents were calculated using kappa statistics (weighted-kappa) (95%CI).
A total of 151 participants completed the study questionnaire which include 15 case scenarios. 73 were nurses and 78 were residents. The results showed 51.3, 56.6, and 59.9% mis-triaged the cases among the nurses, emergency residents, and pediatric residents respectively. Triage scores were compared using the Kruskal Wallis test and were statistically significant with a p value of 0.006. The mean ranks for nurses, emergency residents and pediatric residents were 86.41, 73.6 and 59.96, respectively. The Kruskal Wallis Post-Hoc test was performed to see which groups were statistically significant, and it was found that there was a significant difference between nurses and pediatrics residents (P value = 0.005). Moreover, there were no significant differences found between nurses and ER residents (P value> 0.05).
The triaging system was found to be a very important tool to prioritize patients based on their complaints. The results showed that nurses had the greatest experience in implementing patients on the right triage level. On the other hand, ER and pediatric residents need to develop more knowledge about CTAS and become exposed more to the triaging system during their training.
急救护理仍然是一个挑战,因为患者的到来是不可预测的,可能同时发生,这可能使急诊科挤满了非紧急患者。分诊是每个繁忙的急诊科不可或缺的一部分。加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表(CTAS)被认为是一种在加拿大以外使用的准确工具。本研究旨在确定选择的分诊级别,并通过使用 CTAS 病例比较注册护士、儿科和成人急诊住院医师之间的差异。
本研究在沙特阿拉伯阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城进行。采用横断面自我管理问卷,其中包含 15 个不同分诊级别的病例。所有病例均在获得许可后取自加拿大分诊课程。每个病例提供患者的症状、临床体征和到达急诊科的方式。指示参与者使用以下量表分配分诊级别。本研究采用非随机抽样技术。使用kappa 统计量(加权 kappa)(95%CI)计算居民之间的一致性率。
共有 151 名参与者完成了研究问卷,其中包括 15 个病例。73 名护士和 78 名住院医师。结果显示,护士、急诊住院医师和儿科住院医师分别有 51.3%、56.6%和 59.9%的分诊错误。使用 Kruskal Wallis 检验比较分诊评分,差异具有统计学意义(p 值=0.006)。护士、急诊住院医师和儿科住院医师的平均秩分别为 86.41、73.6 和 59.96。进行了 Kruskal Wallis 事后检验,以确定哪些组具有统计学意义,结果发现护士和儿科住院医师之间存在显著差异(p 值=0.005)。此外,护士和急诊住院医师之间没有发现显著差异(p 值>0.05)。
分诊系统被发现是根据患者的主诉对患者进行优先排序的重要工具。结果表明,护士在将患者安排到正确的分诊级别方面经验最丰富。另一方面,急诊和儿科住院医师需要在培训期间进一步了解 CTAS 并更多地接触分诊系统。