Suppr超能文献

成人房间隔缺损修复手术技术的演变:一项为期10年的单机构经验

Evolution of surgical techniques for atrial septal defect repair in adults: a 10-year single-institution experience.

作者信息

Ak Koray, Aybek Tayfun, Wimmer-Greinecker Gerhard, Ozaslan Feyzan, Bakhtiary Farhad, Moritz Anton, Dogan Selami

机构信息

Department for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;134(3):757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.04.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively analyzed our experience in atrial septal defect repair with varied minimally invasive surgical approaches.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2006, 64 patients underwent surgical repair of atrial septal defects in our center. Patients were grouped into four groups according to the approach used; group 1 (n = 16), partial lower sternotomy; group 2 (n = 20), right anterior small thoracotomy with transthoracic clamping; group 3 (n = 4), right anterior small thoracotomy with endoaortic balloon clamping; and group 4 (n = 24), totally endoscopic approach with the use of the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, Calif). Preoperative diagnosis was a large secundum type atrial septal defect in 60 patients, primum type in 3 patients, and sinus venosus type in 1 patient.

RESULTS

Complete atrial septal defect closure was verified by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in all patients. There was neither perioperative mortality nor major complication. Groups 3 and 4 had significantly longer aortic crossclamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and skin-to-skin operative times than had groups 1 and 2 (P = .000). All groups had similar ventilation time, postoperative drainage, and intensive care unit and hospital stays. Only 2 patients in group 4 were converted to the minithoracotomy owing to endoaortic balloon failure. During the follow-up of 30 +/- 24.3 months, 1 patient in group 3 was reoperated on owing to significant residual shunting.

CONCLUSIONS

All types of atrial septal defects can be repaired via those four different approaches as safely as can be done by the conventional technique. General complications during surgical procedures are negligible. These approaches may be considered a standard treatment and an adjunct to transcatheter treatment options in atrial septal defect repair.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性分析了采用多种微创外科手术方法修复房间隔缺损的经验。

方法

1997年至2006年,我们中心有64例患者接受了房间隔缺损修补手术。根据手术方法将患者分为四组;第1组(n = 16),部分低位胸骨切开术;第2组(n = 20),经胸钳闭的右前小切口开胸术;第3组(n = 4),经主动脉内球囊钳闭的右前小切口开胸术;第4组(n = 24),使用达芬奇手术系统(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州山景城)的完全内镜手术方法。术前诊断为60例继发孔型大房间隔缺损,3例原发孔型,1例静脉窦型。

结果

所有患者术中经食管超声心动图均证实房间隔缺损完全闭合。围手术期无死亡病例,也无严重并发症。第3组和第4组的主动脉阻断、体外循环和皮肤到皮肤的手术时间明显长于第1组和第2组(P = .000)。所有组的通气时间、术后引流量、重症监护病房住院时间和住院总时间相似。第4组仅2例因主动脉内球囊失败转为小切口开胸手术。在30±24.3个月的随访中,第3组1例患者因明显残余分流而再次手术。

结论

所有类型的房间隔缺损都可以通过这四种不同的方法进行修复,其安全性与传统技术相当。手术过程中的一般并发症可以忽略不计。这些方法可被视为房间隔缺损修复的标准治疗方法及经导管治疗选择的辅助方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验