• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干细胞研究中的众包案例。

A case for crowd sourcing in stem cell research.

作者信息

Dekkers Olaf M, Mummery Christine L, Rabelink Ton J

机构信息

Departments of Clinical Epidemiology, Medicine, and

Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014 Nov;3(11):1259-61. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0125. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

DOI:10.5966/sctm.2014-0125
PMID:25232185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4214850/
Abstract

Thousands of patients and placebo-treated controls have been included in many clinical trials of stem cell therapy over the last decade or so, but often the study groups have been small. Their scientific value may therefore be limited and their ethical justification questionable. Would "crowd sourcing" for data sharing be a means of increasing the collective value of clinical trials? Here, we make a case for open access of all data emerging from stem cell studies (trials but also observational studies) independent of whether they are investigator-initiated or commercially driven.

摘要

在过去十年左右的时间里,数千名患者和接受安慰剂治疗的对照组被纳入了许多干细胞治疗的临床试验,但研究组规模往往较小。因此,它们的科学价值可能有限,其伦理合理性也值得质疑。数据共享的“众包”会是提高临床试验集体价值的一种方式吗?在此,我们主张开放获取干细胞研究(试验以及观察性研究)产生的所有数据,无论这些研究是由研究者发起还是商业驱动。

相似文献

1
A case for crowd sourcing in stem cell research.干细胞研究中的众包案例。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014 Nov;3(11):1259-61. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0125. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Ethical issues in stem cell research and therapy.干细胞研究与治疗中的伦理问题。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014 Jul 7;5(4):85. doi: 10.1186/scrt474.
3
An ethical framework for expanded access to cell-based therapies.扩大细胞疗法可及性的伦理框架。
Regen Med. 2011 May;6(3):273-5. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.12.
4
ISSCR's Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: Supporting development of safe and efficacious stem cell-based interventions.国际干细胞研究学会干细胞研究和临床转化指南:支持安全有效的基于干细胞的干预措施的发展。
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jun 8;16(6):1394-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials.评价 Cochrane Crowd 的结果表明,众包在识别随机试验方面产生了准确的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update.国际干细胞研究学会干细胞研究与临床转化指南:2021 年更新版。
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jun 8;16(6):1398-1408. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Data sharing in stem cell translational science: policy statement by the International Stem Cell Forum Ethics Working Party.干细胞转化科学中的数据共享:国际干细胞论坛伦理工作组的政策声明
Regen Med. 2015;10(7):857-61. doi: 10.2217/rme.15.42. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Emerging stem cell ethics.新兴的干细胞伦理学。
Science. 2018 Jun 22;360(6395):1275. doi: 10.1126/science.aau4720.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The ethics of stem cells revisited.重新审视干细胞的伦理问题。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
PubChem synonym filtering process using crowdsourcing.使用众包的PubChem同义词筛选过程。
J Cheminform. 2024 Jun 16;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13321-024-00868-3.
2
Ethical considerations in tissue engineering research: Case studies in translation.组织工程研究中的伦理考量:转化案例研究
Methods. 2016 Apr 15;99:135-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis.自体骨髓干细胞试验与射血分数改善的差异(DAMASCENE):加权回归和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 28;348:g2688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2688.
2
White paper on how to go forward with cell-based advanced therapies in Europe.关于如何在欧洲推进基于细胞的先进疗法的白皮书。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2014 Oct;20(19-20):2549-54. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0589. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
3
Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.干细胞方法面临新问题。
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):283. doi: 10.1038/507283a.
4
Stamina therapies: Time to call a halt.耐力疗法:是时候叫停了。
Nature. 2014 Feb 27;506(7489):434. doi: 10.1038/506434b.
5
Crowd-sourcing: Strength in numbers.
Nature. 2014 Feb 27;506(7489):422-3. doi: 10.1038/506422a.
6
The global landscape of stem cell clinical trials.全球干细胞临床试验格局。
Regen Med. 2014 Jan;9(1):27-39. doi: 10.2217/rme.13.80. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis.大型随机临床试验未发表结果的分析:横断面研究。
BMJ. 2013 Oct 29;347:f6104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6104.
8
Standardization of whole blood immune phenotype monitoring for clinical trials: panels and methods from the ONE study.临床试验中全血免疫表型监测的标准化:来自ONE研究的检测板和方法
Transplant Res. 2013 Oct 25;2(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2047-1440-2-17.
9
Crowd sourcing a new paradigm for interactome driven drug target identification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.群体资源挖掘结核分枝杆菌互作组驱动的药物靶标新范式。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039808. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
10
Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview.随机对照试验与观察性研究中不良反应数据的荟萃分析:方法学概述。
PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001026. Epub 2011 May 3.