Knutsen Elisa J, Paryavi Ebrahim, Castillo Renan C, OʼToole Robert V
*R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and †Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 May;29(5):e183-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000241.
Among orthopaedic trauma patients, little is known regarding the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient levels of depression and "activation" (level of involvement of patient in his or her own care). Our hypothesis was that satisfaction is correlated to levels of depression and activation.
Patient questionnaires.
Level 1 trauma center.
One hundred twenty-four patients with at least one fracture.
Patients were evaluated at orthopaedic trauma clinics 6 weeks or longer after injury.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), Patient Activation Measure, and Patient Health Questionnaire, a screening and evaluation tool for the presence and severity of depression. Spearman correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between activation level and depression severity with PSQ domains. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models determined independent effects of depression and activation on general satisfaction.
Patient satisfaction was moderate to high in general (mean score, 4.17). Spearman correlation coefficients were high for patient activation and all PSQ domains (generally >0.3, P < 0.05). Correlation coefficients were weaker for depression and PSQ domains (rho range, 0.16-0.33). Final multivariate linear regression model indicated improvement in general satisfaction of 0.14 with increasing patient activation. A decrease in general satisfaction of -0.03 was noted with increasing Patient Health Questionnaire depression score.
Patient satisfaction is strongly correlated with patient activation but less correlated with the presence of depression. Patient satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma might be improved by encouraging and coaching patients on how to be more involved in their own health care.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
在骨科创伤患者中,关于患者满意度与抑郁水平及“参与度”(患者在自身护理中的参与程度)之间的关系鲜为人知。我们的假设是满意度与抑郁水平和参与度相关。
患者问卷调查。
一级创伤中心。
124例至少有一处骨折的患者。
患者在受伤后6周或更长时间在骨科创伤诊所接受评估。
患者满意度问卷(PSQ)、患者参与度测量表以及患者健康问卷,后者是一种用于筛查和评估抑郁存在情况及严重程度的工具。Spearman相关系数评估了参与度水平和抑郁严重程度与PSQ各领域之间的关系。双变量和多变量线性回归模型确定了抑郁和参与度对总体满意度的独立影响。
总体患者满意度为中度至高(平均得分4.17)。患者参与度与所有PSQ领域的Spearman相关系数较高(一般>0.3,P<0.05)。抑郁与PSQ领域的相关系数较弱(rho范围为0.16 - 0.33)。最终的多变量线性回归模型表明,随着患者参与度增加,总体满意度提高0.14。随着患者健康问卷抑郁得分增加,总体满意度下降 - 0.03。
患者满意度与患者参与度密切相关,但与抑郁的存在相关性较小。通过鼓励和指导患者如何更多地参与自身医疗保健,可能会提高骨科创伤后的患者满意度。
预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。