Suppr超能文献

根据髋部骨折类型,椎体骨折的分布在患者之间存在差异。

Distribution of vertebral fractures varies among patients according to hip fracture type.

作者信息

Watt J, Cox L, Crilly R G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Western University, 801 Commissioner's Road E., London, ON, N6C5J1, Canada.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar;26(3):885-90. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2887-y. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in hip fracture patients. Unlike patients with intertrochanteric fractures, those with subcapital fractures were less likely to have vertebral fractures in the T4-T10 region of the spine. The dissimilar distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with intertrochanteric and subcapital fractures may indicate different underlying etiologies.

INTRODUCTION

There are two main types of hip fractures: intertrochanteric and subcapital. Both types can have associated vertebral fractures. In this study, we explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in the two hip fracture populations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a convenience sample of 120 patients: 40 with subcapital fractures and vertebral fractures, 40 with intertrochanteric fractures and vertebral fractures, and 40 with vertebral fractures only. Based on Genant's semiquantitative assessment method of radiographic images, the distribution and severity of each patient's vertebral fractures were explored [1].

RESULTS

Patients with subcapital fractures had significantly fewer total vertebral fractures (93 vs. 144, p = 0.005; 93 vs. 127, p = 0.019), vertebral fractures from T4 to T10 (41 vs. 81, p = 0.005; 41 vs. 64, p = 0.042), and vertebral fractures at the T7-T8 peak (11 vs. 31, p = 0.002; 11 vs. 30, p = 0.003) than patients with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone, respectively, and they were more likely to have only one vertebral fracture (15 vs. 3, p < 0.001; 15 vs. 2, p < 0.001). The number of vertebral fractures from T11 to L4 and at the T12-L1 peak did not differ among the groups. The numbers of fractures at each vertebral level was significantly correlated only between those with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone (r = 0.65, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with subcapital fractures differed from the other fracture groups, which may indicate that subcapital fractures and some lumbar fractures have a different underlying etiology than intertrochanteric fractures and thoracic (T4-T10) fractures.

摘要

未标注

本研究探讨了髋部骨折患者椎体骨折的分布情况。与转子间骨折患者不同,股骨头下骨折患者在脊柱T4 - T10区域发生椎体骨折的可能性较小。转子间骨折和股骨头下骨折患者椎体骨折的不同分布可能表明潜在病因不同。

引言

髋部骨折主要有两种类型:转子间骨折和股骨头下骨折。这两种类型都可能伴有椎体骨折。在本研究中,我们探讨了这两类髋部骨折人群中椎体骨折的分布情况。

方法

这是一项对120例患者便利样本的回顾性分析:40例股骨头下骨折合并椎体骨折患者,40例转子间骨折合并椎体骨折患者,以及40例仅患有椎体骨折的患者。基于Genant对X线影像的半定量评估方法,探讨了每位患者椎体骨折的分布及严重程度[1]。

结果

与转子间骨折患者和仅患有椎体骨折的患者相比,股骨头下骨折患者的椎体骨折总数显著较少(93例对144例,p = 0.005;93例对127例,p = 0.019),T4至T10椎体骨折(41例对81例,p = 0.005;41例对64例,p = 0.042),以及T7 - T8峰值处的椎体骨折(11例对31例,p = 0.002;11例对30例,p = 0.003),且他们更有可能仅发生一处椎体骨折(15例对3例,p < 0.001;15例对2例,p < 0.001)。T11至L4椎体骨折数量以及T12 - L1峰值处的骨折数量在各组之间无差异。仅转子间骨折患者和仅患有椎体骨折的患者之间,各椎体水平的骨折数量显著相关(r = 0.65,p = 0.009)。

结论

股骨头下骨折患者的椎体骨折分布与其他骨折组不同,这可能表明股骨头下骨折和一些腰椎骨折的潜在病因与转子间骨折和胸椎(T4 - T10)骨折不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验