Packham Ian M, Watson Steve P, Bicknell Roy, Egginton Stuart
Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Immunity and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 19;9(9):e107503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107503. eCollection 2014.
We sought to determine a role for platelets in in vivo angiogenesis, quantified by changes in the capillary to fibre ratio (C:F) of mouse skeletal muscle, utilising two distinct forms of capillary growth to identify differential effects. Capillary sprouting was induced by muscle overload, and longitudinal splitting by chronic hyperaemia. Platelet depletion was achieved by anti-GPIbα antibody treatment. Sprouting induced a significant increase in C:F (1.42±0.02 vs. contralateral 1.29±0.02, P<0.001) that was abolished by platelet depletion, while the significant C:F increase caused by splitting (1.40±0.03 vs. control 1.28±0.03, P<0.01) was unaffected. Granulocyte/monocyte depletion showed this response was not immune-regulated. VEGF overexpression failed to rescue angiogenesis following platelet depletion, suggesting the mechanism is not simply reliant on growth factor release. Sprouting occurred normally following antibody-induced GPVI shedding, suggesting platelet activation via collagen is not involved. BrdU pulse-labelling showed no change in the proliferative potential of cells associated with capillaries after platelet depletion. Inhibition of platelet activation by acetylsalicylic acid abolished sprouting, but not splitting angiogenesis, paralleling the response to platelet depletion. We conclude that platelets differentially regulate mechanisms of angiogenesis in vivo, likely via COX signalling. Since endothelial proliferation is not impaired, we propose a link between COX1 and induction of endothelial migration.
我们试图确定血小板在体内血管生成中的作用,通过小鼠骨骼肌毛细血管与纤维比例(C:F)的变化来量化血管生成,利用两种不同形式的毛细血管生长来识别差异效应。通过肌肉超负荷诱导毛细血管发芽,通过慢性充血诱导纵向分裂。通过抗GPIbα抗体治疗实现血小板耗竭。发芽导致C:F显著增加(1.42±0.02对侧为1.29±0.02,P<0.001),血小板耗竭可消除这种增加,而分裂引起的C:F显著增加(1.40±0.03对对照1.28±0.03,P<0.01)不受影响。粒细胞/单核细胞耗竭表明这种反应不受免疫调节。血小板耗竭后,VEGF过表达未能挽救血管生成,这表明该机制不仅仅依赖于生长因子的释放。抗体诱导的GPVI脱落后,发芽正常发生,这表明不涉及通过胶原蛋白激活血小板。BrdU脉冲标记显示血小板耗竭后与毛细血管相关的细胞增殖潜力没有变化。乙酰水杨酸抑制血小板激活消除了发芽,但没有消除分裂血管生成,这与对血小板耗竭的反应相似。我们得出结论,血小板在体内差异调节血管生成机制,可能通过COX信号传导。由于内皮细胞增殖未受损,我们提出COX1与内皮细胞迁移诱导之间存在联系。