Cramm Jane Murray, Nieboer Anna Petra
Department of Health Policy & Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 19;4(9):e005914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005914.
The chronic care model is an increasingly used approach to improve the quality of care through system changes in care delivery. While theoretically these system changes are expected to increase productive patient-professional interaction empirical evidence is lacking. This study aims to identify the influence of quality of care on productive patient-professional interaction.
Longitudinal study in 18 Dutch regions.
Questionnaires were sent to all 5076 patients participating in 18 Disease Management Programmes (DMPs) in 2010 (2676 (53%) respondents). One year later (T1), 4693 patients still participating in the DMPs received a questionnaire (2191 (47%) respondents) and 2 years later (in 2012; T2) 1722 patients responded (out of 4350; 40% response).
DMPs
Patients' perceptions of the productivity of interactions (measured as relational coordination/coproduction of care) with professionals. Patients were asked about communication dimensions (frequent, accurate, and problem-solving communication) and relationship dimensions (shared goals and mutual respect).
After controlling for background characteristics these results clearly show that quality of chronic care (T0), first-year changes in quality of chronic care (T1-T0) and second-year changes in quality of chronic care (T2-T1) predicted productive interactions between patients and professionals at T2 (all at p≤0.001). Furthermore, we found a negative relationship between lower educational level and productive interactions between patients and professionals 2 years later.
We can conclude that successfully dealing with the consequences of chronic illnesses requires proactive patients who are able to make productive decisions together with their healthcare providers. Since patients and professionals share responsibility for management of the chronic illness, they must also share control of interactions and decisions. The importance of patient-centeredness is growing and this study reports a first example of how quality of chronic care stimulates productive interactions between patients and professionals.
慢性病照护模式是一种越来越多地被用于通过改变照护提供系统来提高照护质量的方法。虽然从理论上讲,这些系统改变有望增加患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动,但缺乏实证证据。本研究旨在确定照护质量对患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动的影响。
在荷兰18个地区进行的纵向研究。
2010年,向参与18个疾病管理项目(DMP)的所有5076名患者发送了问卷(2676名(53%)受访者)。一年后(T1),仍参与DMP的4693名患者收到了问卷(2191名(47%)受访者),两年后(2012年;T2),1722名患者做出了回应(在4350名中;40%的回应率)。
疾病管理项目
患者对与专业人员互动的成效的看法(以关系协调/照护共同生产来衡量)。询问患者关于沟通维度(频繁、准确和解决问题的沟通)和关系维度(共同目标和相互尊重)。
在控制了背景特征后,这些结果清楚地表明,慢性病照护质量(T0)、慢性病照护质量的第一年变化(T1 - T0)和慢性病照护质量的第二年变化(T2 - T1)预测了T2时患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动(所有p≤0.001)。此外,我们发现较低的教育水平与两年后患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动呈负相关。
我们可以得出结论,成功应对慢性病的后果需要积极主动的患者,他们能够与医疗服务提供者共同做出富有成效的决策。由于患者和专业人员共同承担慢性病管理的责任,他们也必须共同控制互动和决策。以患者为中心的重要性日益增加,本研究报告了一个慢性病照护质量如何促进患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动的首个实例。