• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A longitudinal study to identify the influence of quality of chronic care delivery on productive interactions between patients and (teams of) healthcare professionals within disease management programmes.一项纵向研究,旨在确定慢性病护理服务质量对疾病管理项目中患者与医疗专业人员(团队)之间有效互动的影响。
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 19;4(9):e005914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005914.
2
Chronically ill patients' self-management abilities to maintain overall well-being: what is needed to take the next step in the primary care setting?慢性病患者维持整体健康的自我管理能力:在初级保健环境中迈出下一步需要什么?
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Sep 15;16:123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0340-8.
3
Quality of primary care delivery and productive interactions among community-living frail older persons and their general practitioners and practice nurses.基层医疗服务质量与社区居住的体弱老年人及其全科医生和执业护士之间的生产性互动。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 16;19(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4255-2.
4
The changing nature of chronic care and coproduction of care between primary care professionals and patients with COPD and their informal caregivers.慢性护理的不断变化的性质以及初级护理专业人员与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者及其非正式护理人员之间的共同护理。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Jan 27;11:175-82. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S94409. eCollection 2016.
5
The importance of productive patient-professional interaction for the well-being of chronically ill patients.富有成效的医患互动对慢性病患者福祉的重要性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):897-903. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0813-6. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
The role of team climate in improving the quality of chronic care delivery: a longitudinal study among professionals working with chronically ill adolescents in transitional care programmes.团队氛围在改善慢性病护理服务质量中的作用:一项针对参与过渡性护理项目的慢性病青少年护理专业人员的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 May 22;4(5):e005369. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005369.
7
High-quality chronic care delivery improves experiences of chronically ill patients receiving care.高质量的慢性病护理可改善接受护理的慢性病患者的体验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):689-95. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt065. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol.大规模实施疾病管理计划在荷兰不同地区的评估:研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-6.
9
Reducing bottlenecks: professionals' and adolescents' experiences with transitional care delivery.减少瓶颈:专业人员和青少年在过渡性护理服务中的经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 31;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-47.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at a public sector district hospital.公立区医院 2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Jun 6;65(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5713.
2
Are there socioeconomic inequalities in polypharmacy among older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人多重用药存在社会经济不平等现象吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03835-z.
3
mHealth impact on secondary stroke prevention: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials among stroke survivors between 2010-2020.移动健康对二级卒中预防的影响:对2010年至2020年间卒中幸存者随机对照试验的范围综述
Mhealth. 2022 Apr 20;8:19. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-21-27. eCollection 2022.
4
A cross-sectional study investigating the relationships between self-management abilities, productive patient-professional interactions, and well-being of community-dwelling frail older people.一项横断面研究,旨在调查社区居住的体弱老年人的自我管理能力、有效的医患互动与幸福感之间的关系。
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;18(3):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00586-3. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Relational interventions for organizational learning: An experience report.组织学习的关系干预:一份经验报告。
Learn Health Syst. 2021 May 2;5(3):e10270. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10270. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
A Real-World Single-Centre Study of Patients with Diabetic Macular Oedema Who Wore a Home-Use Sleep Mask (Noctura 400) for One Year.一项针对糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者使用家用睡眠面罩(Noctura 400)一年的单中心真实世界研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 15;2021:6612126. doi: 10.1155/2021/6612126. eCollection 2021.
7
Quality of primary care delivery and productive interactions among community-living frail older persons and their general practitioners and practice nurses.基层医疗服务质量与社区居住的体弱老年人及其全科医生和执业护士之间的生产性互动。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 16;19(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4255-2.
8
The role of collective efficacy in long-term condition management: A metasynthesis.集体效能在慢性病管理中的作用:元综合分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e588-e603. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12779. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Promoting chronic disease management in persons with complex social needs: A qualitative descriptive study.促进有复杂社会需求人群的慢性病管理:一项定性描述性研究。
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479973119832025. doi: 10.1177/1479973119832025.
10
Patient cardiovascular risk self-management: results from a randomized trial of motivational interviewing delivered by practice nurses.患者心血管风险自我管理:实践护士实施动机性访谈的随机试验结果。
Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 31;36(4):460-466. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy087.

本文引用的文献

1
Family well-being in a participant-directed autism waiver program: the role of relational coordination.参与者主导的自闭症豁免项目中的家庭福祉:关系协调的作用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Dec;58(12):1091-104. doi: 10.1111/jir.12102. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
2
Short and long term improvements in quality of chronic care delivery predict program sustainability.慢性护理提供的质量在短期和长期的改善预测了项目的可持续性。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.035. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
The role of disease management programs in the health behavior of chronically ill patients.疾病管理项目在慢性病患者健康行为中的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
4
Situational awareness, relational coordination and integrated care delivery to hospitalized elderly in the Netherlands: a comparison between hospitals.荷兰住院老年人的情境意识、关系协调与综合护理服务:医院间的比较
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Jan 10;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-3.
5
High-quality chronic care delivery improves experiences of chronically ill patients receiving care.高质量的慢性病护理可改善接受护理的慢性病患者的体验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):689-95. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt065. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
The importance of multidisciplinary teamwork and team climate for relational coordination among teams delivering care to older patients.多学科团队合作以及团队氛围对老年患者护理团队间关系协调的重要性。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Apr;70(4):791-9. doi: 10.1111/jan.12233. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
7
Relational coordination between community health nurses and other professionals in delivering care to community-dwelling frail people.社区健康护士与其他专业人员在为社区居家体弱老人提供护理时的关系协调。
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Mar;22(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12041. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
In the Netherlands, rich interaction among professionals conducting disease management led to better chronic care.在荷兰,从事疾病管理的专业人员之间的丰富互动促进了更好的慢性病护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2493-500. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1304.
9
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其简短版(PACIC-S)进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.
10
Relational coordination promotes quality of chronic care delivery in Dutch disease-management programs.关系协调促进荷兰疾病管理项目中慢性病护理的交付质量。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Oct-Dec;37(4):301-9. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182355ea4.

一项纵向研究,旨在确定慢性病护理服务质量对疾病管理项目中患者与医疗专业人员(团队)之间有效互动的影响。

A longitudinal study to identify the influence of quality of chronic care delivery on productive interactions between patients and (teams of) healthcare professionals within disease management programmes.

作者信息

Cramm Jane Murray, Nieboer Anna Petra

机构信息

Department of Health Policy & Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 19;4(9):e005914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005914.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005914
PMID:25239294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4170203/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The chronic care model is an increasingly used approach to improve the quality of care through system changes in care delivery. While theoretically these system changes are expected to increase productive patient-professional interaction empirical evidence is lacking. This study aims to identify the influence of quality of care on productive patient-professional interaction.

SETTING

Longitudinal study in 18 Dutch regions.

PARTICIPANTS

Questionnaires were sent to all 5076 patients participating in 18 Disease Management Programmes (DMPs) in 2010 (2676 (53%) respondents). One year later (T1), 4693 patients still participating in the DMPs received a questionnaire (2191 (47%) respondents) and 2 years later (in 2012; T2) 1722 patients responded (out of 4350; 40% response).

INTERVENTIONS

DMPs

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Patients' perceptions of the productivity of interactions (measured as relational coordination/coproduction of care) with professionals. Patients were asked about communication dimensions (frequent, accurate, and problem-solving communication) and relationship dimensions (shared goals and mutual respect).

FINDINGS

After controlling for background characteristics these results clearly show that quality of chronic care (T0), first-year changes in quality of chronic care (T1-T0) and second-year changes in quality of chronic care (T2-T1) predicted productive interactions between patients and professionals at T2 (all at p≤0.001). Furthermore, we found a negative relationship between lower educational level and productive interactions between patients and professionals 2 years later.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that successfully dealing with the consequences of chronic illnesses requires proactive patients who are able to make productive decisions together with their healthcare providers. Since patients and professionals share responsibility for management of the chronic illness, they must also share control of interactions and decisions. The importance of patient-centeredness is growing and this study reports a first example of how quality of chronic care stimulates productive interactions between patients and professionals.

摘要

目的

慢性病照护模式是一种越来越多地被用于通过改变照护提供系统来提高照护质量的方法。虽然从理论上讲,这些系统改变有望增加患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动,但缺乏实证证据。本研究旨在确定照护质量对患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动的影响。

设置

在荷兰18个地区进行的纵向研究。

参与者

2010年,向参与18个疾病管理项目(DMP)的所有5076名患者发送了问卷(2676名(53%)受访者)。一年后(T1),仍参与DMP的4693名患者收到了问卷(2191名(47%)受访者),两年后(2012年;T2),1722名患者做出了回应(在4350名中;40%的回应率)。

干预措施

疾病管理项目

主要结局指标

患者对与专业人员互动的成效的看法(以关系协调/照护共同生产来衡量)。询问患者关于沟通维度(频繁、准确和解决问题的沟通)和关系维度(共同目标和相互尊重)。

研究结果

在控制了背景特征后,这些结果清楚地表明,慢性病照护质量(T0)、慢性病照护质量的第一年变化(T1 - T0)和慢性病照护质量的第二年变化(T2 - T1)预测了T2时患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动(所有p≤0.001)。此外,我们发现较低的教育水平与两年后患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动呈负相关。

结论

我们可以得出结论,成功应对慢性病的后果需要积极主动的患者,他们能够与医疗服务提供者共同做出富有成效的决策。由于患者和专业人员共同承担慢性病管理的责任,他们也必须共同控制互动和决策。以患者为中心的重要性日益增加,本研究报告了一个慢性病照护质量如何促进患者与专业人员之间富有成效的互动的首个实例。