Cramm Jane M, Strating Mathilde M H, Nieboer Anna P
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2014 May 22;4(5):e005369. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005369.
This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of implementing transition programmes in improving the quality of chronic care delivery and (2) identify the predictive role of (changes in) team climate on the quality of chronic care delivery over time.
This longitudinal study was undertaken with professionals working in hospitals and rehabilitation units that participated in the transition programme 'On Your Own Feet Ahead!' in the Netherlands.
A total of 145/180 respondents (80.6%) filled in the questionnaire at the beginning of the programme (T1), and 101/173 respondents (58.4%) did so 1 year later at the end of the programme (T2). A total of 90 (52%) respondents filled in the questionnaire at both time points. Two-tailed, paired t tests were used to investigate improvements over time and multilevel analyses to investigate the predictive role of (changes in) team climate on the quality of chronic care delivery.
Transition programme.
Quality of chronic care delivery measured with the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Short version (ACIC-S).
The overall ACIC-S score at T1 was 5.90, indicating basic or intermediate support for chronic care delivery. The mean ACIC-S score at T2 significantly improved to 6.70, indicating advanced support for chronic care. After adjusting for the quality of chronic care delivery at T1 and significant respondents' characteristics, multilevel regression analyses showed that team climate at T1 (p<0.01) and changes in team climate (p<0.001) predicted the quality of chronic care delivery at T2.
The implementation of transition programmes requires a supportive and stimulating team climate to enhance the quality of chronic care delivery to chronically ill adolescents.
本研究旨在(1)评估实施过渡计划对改善慢性病护理质量的有效性,以及(2)确定团队氛围(的变化)对慢性病护理质量随时间推移的预测作用。
本纵向研究是与荷兰参与“提前自立!”过渡计划的医院和康复单位的专业人员合作开展的。
共有145/180名受访者(80.6%)在计划开始时(T1)填写了问卷,101/173名受访者(58.4%)在计划结束1年后(T2)填写了问卷。共有90名(52%)受访者在两个时间点都填写了问卷。采用双尾配对t检验来研究随时间的改善情况,并采用多层次分析来研究团队氛围(的变化)对慢性病护理质量的预测作用。
过渡计划。
用慢性病护理评估简版(ACIC-S)衡量慢性病护理质量。
T1时ACIC-S的总体得分为5.90,表明对慢性病护理提供基本或中等支持。T2时ACIC-S的平均得分显著提高到6.70,表明对慢性病护理提供高级支持。在对T1时的慢性病护理质量和受访者的显著特征进行调整后,多层次回归分析表明,T1时的团队氛围(p<0.01)和团队氛围的变化(p<0.001)可预测T2时的慢性病护理质量。
实施过渡计划需要支持性和激励性的团队氛围,以提高对慢性病青少年的慢性病护理质量。