Pound Carole, Greenwood Nan
a Centre for Qualitative Research, Bournemouth University , Bournemouth , UK ;
b Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education , St George's University of London and Kingston University , London , UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(20):1987-99. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107783. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Very little is known about how older people from black and minority ethnic (BME) groups caring for someone after a stroke access and engage with social care services. This paper explores both the experiences of carers whose relative was receiving social care services in their own home and the value of a theory of humanising care to understand and explain these experiences.
Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 50 carers from five different ethnic groups: Asian Indian, Asian Pakistani, Black African, Black Caribbean and White British. Data were thematically analysed within a phenomenological framework.
Five interacting themes emerged: communication and bureaucracy; time and timing; communication and rapport building; trust and safety; humanity and the human dimensions of care. Many of the experiences could be interpreted within a conceptual framework of humanising care underpinned by eight interacting dimensions of what it means to be treated as an individual and a human.
Carers from BME and White British groups share many experiences of homecare although language and cultural difference may exacerbate common pressures and stresses. The framework for humanising care is a useful tool to evaluate aspects of homecare that are responsive to dignity and diversity. Implications for Rehabilitation Explicitly identifying, describing and valuing the human dimensions of care may support services in responding appropriately to homecare users from black minority ethnic communities as well as those from white majority groups. Unresponsive services and poor communication may lead to loss of trust with care agencies and undermine BME carers' sense of entitlement and competence in engaging with homecare services. Care worker continuity investing time in building relationships and care worker familiarity is important to many families who access social care services.
对于来自黑人和少数族裔群体的老年人在中风后照顾他人时如何获得社会护理服务并与之互动,我们所知甚少。本文探讨了亲属在自己家中接受社会护理服务的照顾者的经历,以及人性化护理理论对于理解和解释这些经历的价值。
对来自五个不同族裔群体的50名照顾者进行了半结构化访谈,这五个群体分别是:亚洲印度裔、亚洲巴基斯坦裔、非洲黑人、加勒比黑人以及英国白人。在现象学框架内对数据进行了主题分析。
出现了五个相互作用的主题:沟通与官僚作风;时间与时机;沟通与融洽关系的建立;信任与安全;人性与护理的人文维度。许多经历可以在人性化护理的概念框架内进行解读,该框架由八个相互作用的维度支撑,这些维度阐述了被视为个体和人的意义。
黑人和少数族裔群体以及英国白人的照顾者在家庭护理方面有许多共同经历,尽管语言和文化差异可能会加剧共同的压力和紧张感。人性化护理框架是评估家庭护理中对尊严和多样性做出响应的各个方面的有用工具。对康复的启示明确识别、描述和重视护理的人文维度,可能有助于服务机构适当地回应来自黑人和少数族裔社区以及白人多数群体的家庭护理使用者。无响应的服务和糟糕的沟通可能导致对护理机构失去信任,并削弱黑人和少数族裔照顾者在使用家庭护理服务时的权利感和能力感。护理人员的连续性投入时间建立关系以及护理人员的熟悉度对许多使用社会护理服务的家庭来说很重要。