[两种玻璃纤维桩短期临床应用的研究]
[Investigation on the short-term clinical application of two types of glass fiber posts].
作者信息
Song Hui, Wang Jingwen, Deng Xuliang, Wei Yan
出版信息
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;32(4):390-3. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2014.04.017.
OBJECTIVE
The clinical results of restoring defective teeth with two types of glass fiber prothetic systems is investigated to acquire clinical experience for further application of glass fiber posts with independent intellectual property rights.
METHODS
A total of 120 out-patients with restored defective teeth were selected from the Department of Stomatology, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and randomly divided into two groups. OUYA FIBER posts and Tenax Fiber White posts were used to restore defective teeth in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. Clinical evaluation was conducted one week and three months post-restoration.
RESULTS
Both clinical satisfactory rates of OUYA FIBER posts and Tenax Fiber White posts were higher than 98% one week post-restoration and higher than 96% three months post-restoration. No significant differences were observed between the clinical results of restoring defective teeth with the two types of fiber posts. Throughout the healing process, no root canal fracture or marginal staining were observed.
CONCLUSION
OUYA FIBER post and Tenax Fiber White post showed similar clinical outcomes during the period of observation in this study. However, the long-term effects should be observed in future studies.
目的
研究两种玻璃纤维修复系统修复患牙的临床效果，为具有自主知识产权的玻璃纤维桩的进一步应用积累临床经验。
方法
从北京中医药大学附属宣武医院口腔科及北京大学口腔医学院门诊选取120例患牙修复患者，随机分为两组。实验组采用OUYA FIBER桩修复患牙，对照组采用Tenax Fiber White桩修复患牙。修复后1周和3个月进行临床评价。
结果
修复后1周，OUYA FIBER桩和Tenax Fiber White桩的临床满意率均高于98%；修复后3个月，临床满意率均高于96%。两种纤维桩修复患牙的临床效果无显著差异。在整个愈合过程中，未观察到根管折断或边缘染色。
结论
在本研究的观察期内，OUYA FIBER桩和Tenax Fiber White桩的临床效果相似。然而，长期效果有待于进一步研究观察。
Zotero 插件