Tago Damian, Andersson Henrik, Treich Nicolas
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2014;24:203-95.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study presents literature reviews for the period 2000-2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures.
This study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.
设计/方法/途径:本研究呈现了2000年至2013年期间关于(i)农药对健康的影响以及(ii)与农药相关的健康风险的偏好估值的文献综述,同时讨论了应用于农药监管措施的效益成本分析的作用。
本研究表明,健康领域的文献关注的是直接接触农药的个体,即农民,而偏好估值方面的文献关注的是间接接触农药的个体,即消费者。讨论强调了明确农药监管基本原理的必要性、风险认知在效益成本分析中的作用以及该领域跨学科研究的重要性。
原创性/价值:本研究关联了不同学科(健康、经济学、公共政策)关于农药的研究结果,并确定了未来研究的空白。