• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国农民对降低农药使用健康风险的支付意愿:一项条件价值评估研究。

Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Health Risk Reductions of Pesticide Use in China: A Contingent Valuation Study.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 29;15(4):625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040625.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040625
PMID:29596345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5923667/
Abstract

This study aimed to estimate farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for health risk reductions of pesticide use by applying the contingent valuation method (CVM) and to explore the factors that influence farmers' WTP in China. In total, 244 farmers were randomly selected and interviewed. The mean WTP was estimated to be $65.38 (0.94% of total household income) per household per year for a 5/10,000 reduction in morbidity risk. This study shows that farmers' socioeconomic and attitudinal factors that significantly affect their WTP include farmers' farming income, education, household size and risk perceptions. In particular, the results demonstrate that respondents' social trust, social reciprocity and social networks have significant impacts on their WTP. The findings of this study can provide useful insights for policy makers to design effective policies to address health problems related to pesticide use in the developing world.

摘要

本研究旨在应用条件价值评估法(CVM)估算农民对降低农药使用健康风险的支付意愿(WTP),并探讨影响中国农民 WTP 的因素。共随机选取 244 名农民进行访谈。估计每户每年对发病率降低 5/10000 的 WTP 均值为 65.38 美元(占家庭总收入的 0.94%)。本研究表明,农民的社会经济和态度因素显著影响其 WTP,包括农民的农业收入、教育、家庭规模和风险认知。特别是,结果表明,受访者的社会信任、社会互惠和社交网络对其 WTP 有显著影响。本研究结果可为决策者设计有效政策以解决发展中国家与农药使用相关的健康问题提供有益的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e61/5923667/24893dfb410a/ijerph-15-00625-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e61/5923667/24893dfb410a/ijerph-15-00625-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e61/5923667/24893dfb410a/ijerph-15-00625-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Health Risk Reductions of Pesticide Use in China: A Contingent Valuation Study.中国农民对降低农药使用健康风险的支付意愿:一项条件价值评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 29;15(4):625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040625.
2
Farmers' willingness to pay for less health risks by pesticide use: A case study from the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan.农民对通过减少农药使用来降低健康风险的支付意愿:来自巴基斯坦旁遮普省棉区的案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Oct 15;530-531:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.110. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Pesticide Use and Risk Perceptions among Small-Scale Farmers in Anqiu County, China.中国安丘县小规模农户的农药使用与风险认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 30;14(1):29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010029.
4
Valuing health risk in agriculture: a choice experiment approach to pesticide use in China.评估农业中的健康风险:中国农药使用的选择实验方法
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(21):17526-17533. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9418-2. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Exploring factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors.探讨影响农民对计划中的适应方案支付意愿(WTP)的因素,以应对农业部门的气候问题。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(12):9494-504. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
6
[Ecological compensation based on farmers' willingness: A case study of Jingsan County in Hubei Province, China].基于农民意愿的生态补偿:以中国湖北省京山县为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jan;26(1):215-23.
7
Farmers' Heterogeneous Willingness to Pay for Farmland Non-Market Goods and Services on the Basis of a Mixed Logit Model-A Case Study of Wuhan, China.基于混合逻辑模型的农户耕地非市场物品与服务支付意愿异质性研究——以武汉市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 12;16(20):3876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203876.
8
Estimating farmers' willingness to pay for climate change adaptation: the case of the Malaysian agricultural sector.评估农民为适应气候变化的支付意愿:以马来西亚农业部门为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):38. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4254-z. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Pesticides and farmer health in Nicaragua: a willingness-to-pay approach to evaluation.尼加拉瓜的农药与农民健康:一种基于支付意愿的评估方法
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 May;10(2):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0110-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
10
Factors affecting farmers' behaviour in pesticide use: Insights from a field study in northern China.影响农民农药使用行为的因素:来自中国北方实地研究的见解。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;537:360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.150. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The social costs of pesticides: a meta-analysis of the experimental and stated preference literature.农药的社会成本:对实验性和陈述性偏好文献的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83298-3.
2
The effect of health literacy on health investment intention: a cross-sectional study among petrochemical employees in China.健康素养对健康投资意愿的影响:一项针对中国石化员工的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 21;12:1358269. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358269. eCollection 2024.
3
The Effect of Technical Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers' Adoption of Organic Fertilizers in China: Based on the Mediation Role of Ability and Perception.

本文引用的文献

1
Pesticide Use and Risk Perceptions among Small-Scale Farmers in Anqiu County, China.中国安丘县小规模农户的农药使用与风险认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 30;14(1):29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010029.
2
Farmers' willingness to pay for less health risks by pesticide use: A case study from the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan.农民对通过减少农药使用来降低健康风险的支付意愿:来自巴基斯坦旁遮普省棉区的案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Oct 15;530-531:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.110. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Glyphosate-based herbicides potently affect cardiovascular system in mammals: review of the literature.
农业合作社提供的技术培训对中国农民采纳有机肥的影响:基于能力和感知的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114277.
4
Public Perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay for Nanopesticides.公众对纳米农药的认知与支付意愿。
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;12(8):1292. doi: 10.3390/nano12081292.
5
Moderating role of locus of control over health belief model: a study of horticulturists' protective behavior.控制点对健康信念模型的调节作用:园艺工作者保护行为的研究
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 3:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02928-z.
6
Public Willingness to Pay for and Participate in Sanitation Infrastructure Improvement in Western China's Rural Areas.公众对改善中国西部农村地区环境卫生基础设施的支付意愿和参与意愿。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 6;9:788922. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788922. eCollection 2021.
7
Why don't smallholder farmers in Kenya use more biopesticides?为什么肯尼亚的小农不使用更多的生物农药?
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Nov;76(11):3615-3625. doi: 10.1002/ps.5896. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Measuring Consumer Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks of Contracting Dengue Fever.测量消费者为降低感染登革热风险而愿意支付的意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051810.
9
Value Assessment of Health Losses Caused by PM in Changsha City, China.中国长沙市 PM 所致健康损失的评估价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(11):2063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112063.
基于草甘膦的除草剂对哺乳动物心血管系统有显著影响:文献综述
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2015 Apr;15(2):117-26. doi: 10.1007/s12012-014-9282-y.
4
In rural Asia, locking up poisons to prevent suicides.在亚洲农村地区,锁藏毒药以防自杀。
Science. 2013 Aug 16;341(6147):738-9. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6147.738.
5
Global food supply. Reevaluate pesticides for food security and safety.全球粮食供应。重新评估用于粮食安全和保障的杀虫剂。
Science. 2013 Aug 16;341(6147):717-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1241572.
6
Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives.农药与人类慢性疾病:证据、机制与展望。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Apr 15;268(2):157-77. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
7
Pesticide consumption and productivity and the potential of IPM in Bangladesh.农药使用和生产力以及 IPM 在孟加拉国的潜力。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 15;445-446:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
8
Pesticides and farmer health in Nicaragua: a willingness-to-pay approach to evaluation.尼加拉瓜的农药与农民健康:一种基于支付意愿的评估方法
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 May;10(2):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0110-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
9
Our farmers at risk: behaviour and belief system in pesticide safety.我们面临风险的农民:农药安全方面的行为与信仰体系
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Mar;28(1):43-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi066. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
10
Social capital and the collective management of resources.社会资本与资源的集体管理
Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1912-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1090847.