Tse C S, Chang J F, Fung Ada W T, Lam Linda C W, Hau K T, Leung Grace T Y, Balota D A
Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Psychology, Guangdong University of Education, China.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Feb;27(2):231-242. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002038.
With the proportion of older adults in Hong Kong projected to double in size in the next 30 years, it is important to develop measures for detecting individuals in the earliest stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD, 0.5 in Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR). We tested the utility of a non-verbal prospective memory task (PM, ability to remember what one has to do when a specific event occurs in the future) as an early marker for AD in Hong Kong Chinese.
A large community dwelling sample of older adults who are healthy controls (CDR 0, = 125), in the earliest stage of AD (CDR 0.5, = 125), or with mild AD (CDR 1, = 30) participated in this study. Their reaction time/accuracy data were analyzed by mixed-factor analyses of variance to compare the performance of the three CDR groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test the discriminative power of these measures for CDR 0 versus 0.5 participants.
Prospective memory performance declined as a function of AD severity: CDR 0 > CDR 0.5 > CDR 1, suggesting the effects of early-stage AD and AD progression on PM. After partialling out the variance explained by psychometric measures (e.g., ADAS-Cog), reaction time/accuracy measures that reflected the PM still significantly discriminated between CDR 0 versus 0.5 participants in most of the cases.
The effectiveness of PM measures in discriminating individuals in the earliest stage of AD from healthy older adults suggests that these measures should be further developed as tools for early-stage AD discrimination.
预计在未来30年香港老年人的比例将翻倍,因此制定措施以检测处于阿尔茨海默病(AD,临床痴呆评定量表[CDR]为0.5)最早阶段的个体非常重要。我们测试了一项非语言前瞻性记忆任务(PM,即当未来特定事件发生时记住要做之事的能力)作为中国香港地区AD早期标志物的效用。
一大组居住在社区的老年人参与了本研究,其中包括健康对照者(CDR为0,n = 125)、处于AD最早阶段者(CDR为0.5,n = 125)或患有轻度AD者(CDR为1,n = 30)。通过方差混合因子分析对他们的反应时间/准确性数据进行分析,以比较三个CDR组的表现。进行逻辑回归分析以测试这些指标对CDR为0与CDR为0.5参与者的判别能力。
前瞻性记忆表现随着AD严重程度而下降:CDR为0 > CDR为0.5 > CDR为1,这表明AD早期阶段和AD进展对PM的影响。在排除心理测量指标(如ADAS-Cog)所解释的方差后,反映PM的反应时间/准确性指标在大多数情况下仍能显著区分CDR为0与CDR为0.5的参与者。
PM指标在区分处于AD最早阶段的个体与健康老年人方面的有效性表明,这些指标应进一步开发成为早期AD鉴别的工具。