Preventive Medicine Research Institute, 900 Bridgeway, Sausalito, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco and University of California, San Diego, USA.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Jun 7;16(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01482-z.
BACKGROUND: Evidence links lifestyle factors with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We report the first randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine if intensive lifestyle changes may beneficially affect the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia due to AD. METHODS: A 1:1 multicenter randomized controlled phase 2 trial, ages 45-90 with MCI or early dementia due to AD and a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 18 or higher. The primary outcome measures were changes in cognition and function tests: Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and Clinical Dementia Rating Global (CDR-G) after 20 weeks of an intensive multidomain lifestyle intervention compared to a wait-list usual care control group. ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB, and CDR-Global scales were compared using a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and CGIC was compared using Fisher's exact test. Secondary outcomes included plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, other biomarkers, and correlating lifestyle with the degree of change in these measures. RESULTS: Fifty-one AD patients enrolled, mean age 73.5. No significant differences in any measures at baseline. Only two patients withdrew. All patients had plasma Aβ42/40 ratios <0.0672 at baseline, strongly supporting AD diagnosis. After 20 weeks, significant between-group differences in the CGIC (p= 0.001), CDR-SB (p= 0.032), and CDR Global (p= 0.037) tests and borderline significance in the ADAS-Cog test (p= 0.053). CGIC, CDR Global, and ADAS-Cog showed improvement in cognition and function and CDR-SB showed significantly less progression, compared to the control group which worsened in all four measures. Aβ42/40 ratio increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation between lifestyle and both cognitive function and the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio. The microbiome improved only in the intervention group (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive lifestyle changes may significantly improve cognition and function after 20 weeks in many patients with MCI or early dementia due to AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Approved by Western Institutional Review Board on 12/31/2017 (#20172897) and by Institutional Review Boards of all sites. This study was registered retrospectively with clinicaltrials.gov on October 8, 2020 (NCT04606420, ID: 20172897).
背景:有证据表明生活方式因素与阿尔茨海默病(AD)有关。我们报告了第一项随机对照临床试验,以确定强化生活方式改变是否可以有益地影响轻度认知障碍(MCI)或 AD 引起的早期痴呆的进展。
方法:一项 1:1 的多中心随机对照 2 期试验,年龄在 45-90 岁之间,患有 MCI 或 AD 引起的早期痴呆,蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)得分为 18 或更高。主要结局指标是认知和功能测试的变化:临床总体印象变化(CGIC)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表(ADAS-Cog)、临床痴呆评定量表-总盒(CDR-SB)和临床痴呆评定量表-全球(CDR-G),与 20 周强化多领域生活方式干预组相比,等待名单上的常规护理对照组。ADAS-Cog、CDR-SB 和 CDR-Global 量表采用曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森秩和检验进行比较,CGIC 采用 Fisher 精确检验进行比较。次要结局包括血浆 Aβ42/40 比值、其他生物标志物以及将生活方式与这些指标的变化程度相关联。
结果:51 名 AD 患者入组,平均年龄 73.5 岁。基线时无任何指标差异。只有两名患者退出。所有患者基线时的血浆 Aβ42/40 比值均<0.0672,强烈支持 AD 诊断。20 周后,CGIC(p=0.001)、CDR-SB(p=0.032)和 CDR Global(p=0.037)测试的组间差异具有统计学意义,ADAS-Cog 测试的组间差异具有边缘统计学意义(p=0.053)。与对照组相比,CGIC、CDR Global 和 ADAS-Cog 显示认知和功能改善,CDR-SB 显示显著较少进展,而对照组在所有四项指标中均恶化。干预组的 Aβ42/40 比值增加,对照组的 Aβ42/40 比值降低(p=0.003)。生活方式与认知功能和血浆 Aβ42/40 比值均有显著相关性。只有干预组的微生物组得到改善(p<0.0001)。
结论:在许多患有 MCI 或 AD 引起的早期痴呆的患者中,综合生活方式改变可能在 20 周后显著改善认知和功能。
试验注册:2017 年 12 月 31 日经西方机构审查委员会批准(#20172897),并经所有研究地点的机构审查委员会批准。该研究于 2020 年 10 月 8 日在临床试验.gov 上进行了回顾性注册(NCT04606420,ID:20172897)。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025-1
Alzheimers Dement. 2025-2
Regen Ther. 2025-7-26
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025-7-30
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025-7
Neurol Int. 2025-6-14
J Neuroinflammation. 2025-6-21
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025-8
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023-5
N Engl J Med. 2023-1-5
Biomolecules. 2022-1-14