Firas Abdollah and Mani Menon, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; R. Jeffrey Karnes, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Nazareno Suardi, Cesare Cozzarini, Giorgio Gandaglia, Nicola Fossati, Damiano Vizziello, Francesco Montorsi, and Alberto Briganti, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; and Maxine Sun and Pierre I. Karakiewicz, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):3939-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.7893. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in treating patients with pN1 prostate cancer is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the impact of aRT on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in these individuals is related to tumor characteristics.
We evaluated 1,107 patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 1988 and 2010 at two tertiary care centers. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without aRT. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups on the basis of their tumor characteristics and the corresponding CSM rate. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between aRT and CSM rate, as well as overall mortality (OM) rate in each risk group separately.
Overall, 35% of patients received aRT. At multivariable analysis, aRT was associated with more favorable CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). However, when patients were stratified into risk groups, only two groups of men benefited from aRT: (1) patients with positive lymph node (PLN) count ≤ 2, Gleason score 7 to 10, pT3b/pT4 stage, or positive surgical margins (HR, 0.30; P = .002); and (2) patients with PLN count of 3 to 4 (HR, 0.21; P = .02), regardless of other tumor characteristics. These results were confirmed when OM was examined as an end point.
The beneficial impact of aRT on survival in patients with pN1 prostate cancer is highly influenced by tumor characteristics. Men with low-volume nodal disease (≤ two PLNs) in the presence of intermediate- to high-grade, non-specimen-confined disease and those with intermediate-volume nodal disease (three to four PLNs) represent the ideal candidates for aRT after surgery.
辅助放疗(aRT)在治疗 pN1 前列腺癌患者中的作用存在争议。我们检验了这样一个假设,即在这些患者中,aRT 对癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)的影响与肿瘤特征有关。
我们评估了 1988 年至 2010 年在两个三级护理中心接受根治性前列腺切除术和解剖性扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗的 1107 例 pN1 前列腺癌患者。所有患者均接受辅助激素治疗,联合或不联合 aRT。回归树分析根据患者的肿瘤特征和相应的 CSM 率将患者分层为风险组。Cox 回归分析分别测试了 aRT 与 CSM 率以及总死亡率(OM)率之间的关系。
总体而言,35%的患者接受了 aRT。多变量分析显示,aRT 与更有利的 CSM 率相关(风险比 [HR],0.37;P<0.001)。然而,当患者分层为风险组时,只有两组男性受益于 aRT:(1)PLN 计数≤2、Gleason 评分 7 至 10、pT3b/pT4 期或阳性切缘的患者(HR,0.30;P=0.002);(2)PLN 计数为 3 至 4 的患者(HR,0.21;P=0.02),无论其他肿瘤特征如何。当将 OM 作为终点进行检查时,这些结果得到了证实。
aRT 对 pN1 前列腺癌患者生存的有益影响受肿瘤特征的高度影响。淋巴结疾病低容量(≤2 个 PLN)合并中至高级别、非标本受限疾病以及淋巴结疾病中等容量(3 至 4 个 PLN)的患者是术后接受 aRT 的理想候选者。