Herman Talia, Weiss Aner, Brozgol Marina, Giladi Nir, Hausdorff Jeffrey M
Center for the Study of Movement, Department of Neurology, Cognition and Mobility, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel,
J Neurol. 2014 Dec;261(12):2401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7513-6. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is often divided into tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) subtypes. However, objective measures of gait (e.g., stride length, variability) and balance have not been well studied in these subtypes. To better understand these motor subtypes, we objectively quantified gait and balance and their behavioral correlates. 110 patients with PD underwent a clinical evaluation and were stratified into PIGD and TD subtypes. Participants walked under single and dual task conditions while wearing a single body-fixed sensor, both "OFF" and "ON" medications and at home for 3 days. We also examined performance-based tests of mobility, balance, and fall risk. Stricter criteria were also applied, dividing the subjects into predominant representative subgroups: p-PIGD and p-TD. Both the PIGD (n = 62) and TD (n = 42) groups and the p-PIGD (n = 31) and p-TD (n = 32) subgroups were similar with respect to basic disease characteristics (e.g., disease duration, p > 0.69). Surprisingly gait speed, stride length, and variability did not differ between the PIGD and TD groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, the p-PIGD group had reduced gait speed (under single and dual task conditions), shorter strides, increased stride variability, and decreased stride regularity (regularity: p-PIGD 0.66 ± 0.10; p-TD 0.74 ± 0.08; p = 0.003). The p-PIGD group also scored worse on performance-based tests, compared to the p-TD. Clinical assessments of the disturbances seen in patients with the PIGD subtype are not consistent with objective measures; overlapping between the groups is seen in many objective features of gait and balance. These findings suggest that the proposed alternate classification scheme may be useful.
帕金森病(PD)通常分为震颤为主型(TD)和姿势不稳步态障碍型(PIGD)亚型。然而,这些亚型的步态客观指标(如步长、变异性)和平衡尚未得到充分研究。为了更好地理解这些运动亚型,我们对步态和平衡及其行为相关性进行了客观量化。110例帕金森病患者接受了临床评估,并被分为PIGD和TD亚型。参与者在单任务和双任务条件下行走,同时佩戴一个固定在身体上的传感器,分别在“关”药和“开”药状态下以及在家中进行为期3天的监测。我们还检查了基于表现的移动性、平衡和跌倒风险测试。我们还应用了更严格的标准,将受试者分为主要代表性亚组:p-PIGD和p-TD。PIGD组(n = 62)和TD组(n = 42)以及p-PIGD组(n = 31)和p-TD组(n = 32)在基本疾病特征方面相似(如病程,p > 0.69)。令人惊讶的是,PIGD组和TD组之间的步态速度、步长和变异性没有差异(p > 0.05)。相比之下,p-PIGD组的步态速度降低(在单任务和双任务条件下),步幅缩短,步幅变异性增加,步幅规律性降低(规律性:p-PIGD 0.66±0.10;p-TD 0.74±0.08;p = 0.003)。与p-TD组相比,p-PIGD组在基于表现的测试中得分也更低。对PIGD亚型患者所观察到的障碍进行的临床评估与客观测量结果不一致;在步态和平衡的许多客观特征中可以看到组间存在重叠。这些发现表明,所提出的替代分类方案可能是有用的。