a Department of Experimental Psychology , Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University , The Netherlands.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(7):1123-32. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.960005. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) are brief screening instruments for cognitive disorders. Although these instruments have frequently been used in the detection of dementia, there is currently little knowledge on the validity to detect Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) with both screening instruments. KS is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder associated with profound declarative amnesia after thiamine deficiency. A representative sample of 30 patients with KS and 30 age-, education-, gender- and premorbid-IQ-matched controls was administered the MoCA and MMSE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated in addition to the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for various cut-off points on the MoCA and MMSE. Compared with the MMSE, the MoCA demonstrated consistently superior psychometric properties and discriminant validity--AUC: MoCA (1.00 SE .003) and MMSE (0.92 SE .033). When applying a cut-off value as suggested in the manuals of both instruments, the MMSE (< 24) misdiagnosed 46.7% of the patients, while the MoCA (< 26) diagnosed all patients correctly. As a screening instrument with the most optimal cut-offs, the MoCA (optimal cutoff point 22/23, 98.3% correctly diagnosed) was superior to the MMSE (optimal cutoff point 26/27, 83.3% correctly diagnosed). We conclude that both tests have adequate psychometric properties as a screening instrument for the detection of KS, but the MoCA is superior to the MMSE for this specific patient population.
蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)是用于认知障碍的简短筛选工具。尽管这些工具经常用于痴呆症的检测,但目前对于使用这两种筛选工具检测科萨科夫氏综合征(KS)的有效性知之甚少。KS 是一种慢性神经精神障碍,与硫胺素缺乏后严重的陈述性记忆障碍有关。我们对 30 名 KS 患者和 30 名年龄、教育程度、性别和发病前 IQ 匹配的对照组进行了 MoCA 和 MMSE 测试。计算了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC),以及 MoCA 和 MMSE 不同截断值的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。与 MMSE 相比,MoCA 表现出一致的优越的心理测量特性和判别效度——AUC:MoCA(1.00 SE.003)和 MMSE(0.92 SE.033)。当应用两种仪器手册中建议的截断值时,MMSE(<24)误诊了 46.7%的患者,而 MoCA(<26)正确诊断了所有患者。作为一种具有最佳截断值的筛选工具,MoCA(最佳截断值为 22/23,98.3%正确诊断)优于 MMSE(最佳截断值为 26/27,83.3%正确诊断)。我们得出结论,这两种测试都具有作为 KS 检测的筛选工具的足够的心理测量特性,但 MoCA 对于这种特定的患者群体更具优势。