Ramos Silvina, Romero Mariana, Ramón Michel Agustina
Center for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, 1173 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 24;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-72.
In Argentina, abortion has been decriminalized under certain circumstances since the enactment of the Penal Code in 1922. Nevertheless, access to abortion under this regulatory framework has been extremely limited in spite of some recent changes. This article reports the findings of the first phase of an operations research study conducted in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina, regarding the implementation of the local legal and safe abortion access policy.
The project combined research and training to generate a virtuous circle of knowledge production, decision-making, and the fostering of an informed healthcare policy. The project used a pre-post design of three phases: baseline, intervention, and evaluation. It was conducted in two public hospitals. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire (n = 157) and semi-structured interviews (n = 27) were applied to gather information about tacit knowledge about the regulatory framework; personal opinions regarding abortion and its decriminalization; opinions on the requirements needed to carry out legal abortions; and service's responses to women in need of an abortion.
Firstly, a fairly high percentage of health care providers lack accurate information on current legal framework. This deficit goes side by side with a restrictive understanding of both health and rape indications. Secondly, while a great majority of health care providers support abortion under the circumstances consider in the Penal Code, most of them are reluctant towards unrestricted access to abortion. Thirdly, health care providers' willingness to perform abortions is noticeably low given that only half of them are ready to perform an abortion when a woman's life is at risk. Willingness is even lower for each of the other current legal indications.
Findings suggest that there are important challenges for the implementation of a legal abortion policy. Results of the study call for specific strategies targeting health care providers in order to better inform about current legal abortion regulations and to sensitize them about abortion social determinants. The interpretation of the current legal framework needs to be broadened in order to reflect a comprehensive view of the health indication, and stereotypes regarding women's sexuality and abortion decisions need to be dismantled.
在阿根廷,自1922年《刑法典》颁布以来,堕胎在某些情况下已被合法化。然而,尽管最近有一些变化,但在这一监管框架下,堕胎的可及性仍然极为有限。本文报告了在阿根廷圣菲省进行的一项运筹学研究第一阶段的结果,该研究涉及当地合法安全堕胎可及性政策的实施情况。
该项目将研究与培训相结合,以形成知识生产、决策制定和促进明智的医疗政策的良性循环。该项目采用了三个阶段的前后对照设计:基线、干预和评估。研究在两家公立医院进行。通过一份匿名自填式问卷(n = 157)和半结构化访谈(n = 27)来收集有关对监管框架的隐性知识;对堕胎及其合法化的个人看法;对进行合法堕胎所需条件的看法;以及服务机构对有堕胎需求妇女的应对情况的信息。
首先,相当高比例的医疗服务提供者缺乏关于现行法律框架的准确信息。这种信息缺失与对健康和强奸指征的限制性理解并存。其次,虽然绝大多数医疗服务提供者支持《刑法典》所考虑情况下的堕胎,但他们中的大多数人对不受限制的堕胎可及性持抵触态度。第三,医疗服务提供者进行堕胎的意愿明显较低,因为只有一半的人愿意在妇女生命受到威胁时进行堕胎。对于其他现行合法指征,意愿甚至更低。
研究结果表明,合法堕胎政策的实施面临重大挑战。研究结果呼吁针对医疗服务提供者制定具体策略,以便更好地宣传现行合法堕胎法规,并使他们对堕胎的社会决定因素有更深刻的认识。需要拓宽对现行法律框架的解释,以反映对健康指征的全面看法,并且需要消除关于女性性行为和堕胎决定的刻板印象。