实施研究证据的采纳和用于决策。
Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making.
机构信息
Department of Knowledge Management and Sharing, WHO, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
出版信息
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Jul 2;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-20.
Abstract
A major obstacle to the progress of the Millennium Development Goals has been the inability of health systems in many low- and middle-income countries to effectively implement evidence-informed interventions. This article discusses the relationships between implementation research and knowledge translation and identifies the role of implementation research in the design and execution of evidence-informed policy. After a discussion of the benefits and synergies needed to translate implementation research into action, the article discusses how implementation research can be used along the entire continuum of the use of evidence to inform policy. It provides specific examples of the use of implementation research in national level programmes by looking at the scale up of zinc for the treatment of childhood diarrhoea in Bangladesh and the scaling up of malaria treatment in Burkina Faso. A number of tested strategies to support the transfer of implementation research results into policy-making are provided to help meet the standards that are increasingly expected from evidence-informed policy-making practices.
摘要
实现千年发展目标的主要障碍之一是，许多中低收入国家的卫生系统无法有效地实施循证干预措施。本文讨论了实施研究与知识转化之间的关系，并确定了实施研究在设计和执行循证政策方面的作用。在讨论了将实施研究转化为行动所需的益处和协同作用之后，本文讨论了如何在循证用于制定政策的整个连续体中使用实施研究。它通过考察孟加拉国扩大使用锌治疗儿童腹泻以及布基纳法索扩大疟疾治疗范围的情况，提供了在国家一级方案中使用实施研究的具体实例。提供了一些经过检验的策略来支持将实施研究结果转移到决策中，以帮助达到循证决策实践日益期望的标准。
相似文献
1
Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making.实施研究证据的采纳和用于决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Jul 2;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-20.
2
Development of a framework to improve the utilisation of malaria research for policy development in Malawi.制定一个框架，以提高疟疾研究在马拉维政策制定中的利用。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Nov 21;15(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0264-y.
3
Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries.将研究证据纳入决策过程：来自五个低收入和中等收入国家的研究者与决策者的看法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 30;13:70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0059-y.
4
Evidence-based policy-making: the implications of globally-applicable research for context-specific problem-solving in developing countries.循证决策：全球适用的研究对发展中国家因地制宜解决问题的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
5
Scaling up zinc treatment of childhood diarrhoea in Bangladesh: theoretical and practical considerations guiding the SUZY Project.在孟加拉国扩大儿童腹泻补锌治疗规模：指导 SUZY 项目的理论和实践考虑因素。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27(2):102-14. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr015. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs): best hope for malaria treatment but inaccessible to the needy!以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法（ACTs）：疟疾治疗的最大希望，但贫困人群难以获得！
Acta Trop. 2005 Sep;95(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.009.
7
Knowledge exchange in the Pacific: The TROPIC (Translational Research into Obesity Prevention Policies for Communities) project.太平洋地区的知识交流：TROPIC（社区肥胖预防政策转化研究）项目。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 25;12:552. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-552.
8
Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi.加强在卫生部门决策中使用研究证据的能力：肯尼亚和马拉维的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0511-5.
9
[A comparative presentation of the population policies of Burkina Faso, Mali and Senegal].[布基纳法索、马里和塞内加尔人口政策的比较介绍]
Pop Sahel. 1992 Jul(Spec No):28-32.
10
Improving knowledge translation in Uganda: more needs to be done.在乌干达改善知识转化：仍有更多工作要做。
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3482. eCollection 2014.
引用本文的文献
1
Solutions of clinical guideline implementation in Iran: A qualitative study.伊朗临床指南实施的解决方案：一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:199. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1648_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Innovations for building implementation science capacity among researchers and policymakers: The Depth and Diffusion Model.在研究人员和政策制定者中培养实施科学能力的创新举措：深度与扩散模型。
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024 Sep;4(3):272-285. doi: 10.1007/s43477-024-00121-x. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
Process of use of evidence products by frontline maternal, newborn and child health staff at the facility level in Ghana.加纳医疗机构层面的一线孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康工作人员使用证据产品的过程。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 26;20(2):e0292505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292505. eCollection 2025.
4
Sustainability of zinc coverage for acute childhood diarrhea in Bangladesh and other low- and middle-income countries: one decade following the SUZY project.孟加拉国及其他低收入和中等收入国家儿童急性腹泻锌补充覆盖率的可持续性：SUZY项目开展十年后
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;5(2):e0004265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004265. eCollection 2025.
5
Research utilization competency development in the health workforce pipeline: Design and formative evaluation of learning objectives for health professions students.卫生人力培养过程中的研究应用能力发展：针对卫生专业学生学习目标的设计与形成性评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 2;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01238-z.
6
Positioning implementation science in national immunization programmes to improve coverage equity and advance progress toward Immunization Agenda 2030: An urgent global health imperative.将实施科学定位在国家免疫规划中，以提高覆盖公平性并推进实现 2030 年免疫议程：一项紧迫的全球卫生要务。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2331872. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2331872. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
7
Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.低中等收入国家健康政策制定与实践研究转化面临的挑战：范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 6;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01084-5.
8
New Antenatal Model in Africa and India (NAMAI) study: implementation research to improve antenatal care using WHO recommendations.非洲和印度新产前模型（NAMAI）研究：使用世界卫生组织建议改善产前护理的实施研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Aug 10;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01014-5.
9
Strengthening health policy development and management systems in low- and middle- income countries: South Africa's approach.加强低收入和中等收入国家的卫生政策制定与管理体系：南非的做法。
Health Policy Open. 2020 Aug 1;1:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100010. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?科学政策接口的开放科学：引入证据？
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 20;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00867-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Foreword: Lesson learning about getting research into policy and practice.前言：关于将研究转化为政策和实践的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 16;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-S1-S1.
2
Research translation to inform national health policies: learning from multiple perspectives in Uganda.研究转化以支持国家卫生政策：乌干达的多方经验
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Mar 9;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-S1-S13.
3
Mapping of health system functions to strengthen priority programs. The case of maternal health in Mexico.卫生系统功能映射以加强重点项目。以墨西哥的母婴健康为例。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 15;11:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-164.
4
Scaling up zinc treatment of childhood diarrhoea in Bangladesh: theoretical and practical considerations guiding the SUZY Project.在孟加拉国扩大儿童腹泻补锌治疗规模：指导 SUZY 项目的理论和实践考虑因素。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27(2):102-14. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr015. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
5
Defining research to improve health systems.定义旨在改善卫生系统的研究。
PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 16;7(11):e1001000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001000.
6
EVIPNet Africa's first series of policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking.东非循证实践与创新政策网络（EVIPNet）非洲的首批政策简报，以支持基于证据的政策制定。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Apr;26(2):229-32. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000206.
7
A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisions.一个用于强制性影响评估的框架，以确保做出充分知情的公共政策决策。
Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):427-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61251-4.
8
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review.证据为基础的卫生决策支持工具（STP）8：决定对系统评价的信任程度。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S8.
9
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking.支持循证卫生决策的工具（STP）15：让公众参与循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S15.
10
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking.循证卫生决策支持工具（STP）14：组织和利用政策对话支持循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14.
Zotero 插件