• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.独立分娩中心提供的产妇护理可能节省的医疗补助费用。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Sep 9;4(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.03.a06. eCollection 2014.
2
Midwifery and Birth Centers Under State Medicaid Programs: Current Limits to Beneficiary Access to a High-Value Model of Care.州医疗补助计划中的助产士和分娩中心:受益人获得高价值护理模式的当前限制。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1091-1113. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12473. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.低并发症风险产妇选择替代分娩地点的成本效益:来自英格兰国家前瞻性队列研究的证据。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 18;344:e2292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2292.
4
Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis.《避孕选择项目的医疗补助节省:成本节约分析》。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):595.e1-595.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州孕产妇护理协调对医疗补助计划分娩结局影响的评估。
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1625-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1625.
6
Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.独立分娩中心的助产护理:一种比传统产科护理更安全、更有效的替代方法。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1750-68. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12061. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.因修正医疗补助绝育政策而避免的潜在非意愿妊娠和节省的成本。
Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
8
The Family Health and Birth Center--a nurse-midwife-managed center in Washington, DC.家庭健康与生育中心——位于华盛顿特区的一家由助产士管理的中心。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):58-60.
9
Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform.医疗补助覆盖的生育,2008 年至 2010 年,在医疗改革实施的背景下。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):e273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.06.006.
10
Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.独立助产单元:转诊后的母婴结局
Midwifery. 2017 Mar;46:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of costing methodologies used to assess interventions for underserved pregnant people and new parents.针对服务不足的孕妇和新父母干预措施的成本评估方法的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 22;23(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02252-x.
2
Management of pregnancy-related disorders to prevent future risk of coronary artery disease.管理妊娠相关疾病以预防未来患冠状动脉疾病的风险。
Heart. 2024 Dec 23;111(2):83-92. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321606.
3
The Cost of Home Birth in the United States.美国的家庭分娩成本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 1;18(19):10361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910361.
4
Midwifery and Birth Centers Under State Medicaid Programs: Current Limits to Beneficiary Access to a High-Value Model of Care.州医疗补助计划中的助产士和分娩中心:受益人获得高价值护理模式的当前限制。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1091-1113. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12473. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.独立助产士主导单位:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Apr 18;25(3):181-188. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_209_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
6
Financing Maternity and Early Childhood Healthcare in The Australian Healthcare System: Costs to Funders in Private and Public Hospitals Over the First 1000 Days.澳大利亚医疗体系中的母婴保健和早期儿童保健筹资:私营和公立医院头 1000 天的供资者成本。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):554-563. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.68.
7
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端:母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
8
Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.2012年至2014年间在“强力开端”分娩中心接受护理的生育医疗补助受益人的情况。
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):298-305. doi: 10.1111/birt.12302. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.低并发症风险女性的替代分娩环境成本:一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0149463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149463. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform.医疗补助覆盖的生育,2008 年至 2010 年,在医疗改革实施的背景下。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):e273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.06.006.
2
NICE: moving onward.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所:继续前进。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 4;369(1):3-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1303907.
3
Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.独立分娩中心的助产护理:一种比传统产科护理更安全、更有效的替代方法。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1750-68. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12061. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
4
Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.低并发症风险产妇选择替代分娩地点的成本效益:来自英格兰国家前瞻性队列研究的证据。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 18;344:e2292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2292.
5
Births: final data for 2008.出生情况:2008年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 Dec 8;59(1):1, 3-71.
6
The cultural evolution of natural birth.自然分娩的文化演变。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 30;378(9789):394-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61200-2.
7
The role of costs in comparative effectiveness research.成本在比较效果研究中的作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1805-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0647.
8
The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational age among US singleton births.美国单胎分娩中剖宫产与孕周之间的关系。
Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):309-23, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.002.
9
Piercing the veil: the marginalization of midwives in the United States.揭开面纱:美国助产士的边缘化
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(3):610-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.052. Epub 2007 May 1.
10
Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.与计划剖宫产相比,计划阴道分娩的产妇结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):669-77. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40.

独立分娩中心提供的产妇护理可能节省的医疗补助费用。

Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.

作者信息

Howell Embry, Palmer Ashley, Benatar Sarah, Garrett Bowen

机构信息

The Urban Institute-Health Policy Center.

出版信息

Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Sep 9;4(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.03.a06. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.03.a06
PMID:25250198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4167228/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Medicaid pays for about half the births in the United States, at very high cost. Compared to usual obstetrical care, care by midwives at a birth center could reduce costs to the Medicaid program. This study draws on information from a previous study of the outcomes of birth center care to determine whether such care reduces Medicaid costs for low income women.

METHODS

The study uses results from a study of maternal and infant outcomes at the Family Health and Birth Center in Washington, D.C. Costs to Medicaid are derived from birth center data and from other national sources of the cost of obstetrical care.

RESULTS

We estimate that birth center care could save an average of $1,163 per birth (2008 constant dollars), or $11.6 million per 10,000 births per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid is the leading payer for maternity services. As Medicaid faces continuing cost increases and budget constraints, policy makers should consider a larger role for midwives and birth centers in maternity care for low-risk Medicaid pregnant women.

摘要

目标

医疗补助计划支付了美国约一半的分娩费用,成本非常高。与常规产科护理相比,在分娩中心由助产士提供护理可降低医疗补助计划的成本。本研究借鉴了先前一项关于分娩中心护理结果的研究信息,以确定此类护理是否能降低低收入女性的医疗补助成本。

方法

该研究使用了华盛顿特区家庭健康与分娩中心孕产妇和婴儿结局研究的结果。医疗补助的成本来自分娩中心数据以及其他国家产科护理成本来源。

结果

我们估计,分娩中心护理每次分娩平均可节省1163美元(2008年不变美元),即每年每10000例分娩可节省1160万美元。

结论

医疗补助是孕产妇服务的主要支付方。由于医疗补助面临持续的成本增加和预算限制,政策制定者应考虑让助产士和分娩中心在为低风险医疗补助孕妇提供孕产妇护理方面发挥更大作用。