• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(T-PRK)后干眼的比较临床研究。

Dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK): a comparative clinical study.

作者信息

Zarei-Ghanavati Siamak, Sadeghi Javad, Hassanzadeh Samira, Shayan Far Mahdieh, Heravian Shandiz Javad, Jamali Jamshid, Abbasi Mehrabadi Ali, Irandoost Niloofar, Aryanmanesh Sina, Gharouni Ahmad, Varshovi-Jaghargh Iman

机构信息

Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Azadi Avenue, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 20;45(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03626-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03626-y
PMID:40540100
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare dry eye disease (DED) following PRK and T-PRK surgeries using a combined approach of subjective and objective measures, focusing on clinically meaningful outcomes and adjusted statistical modeling.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 89 eyes of patients aged over 20 years were enrolled and grouped into PRK (43 eyes) and T-PRK (46 eyes). The primary outcome was change in ocular surface diseases index (OSDI) score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) and meibomian gland expressibility. Exploratory parameters such as tear meniscus height (TMH), redness score, strip meniscometry (SM Tube), meibomian gland dropout, and meibum quality were also assessed. Statistical models were adjusted for baseline age differences, and corrections for multiple comparisons were applied.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 34.16 ± 7.23 in the PRK and 28.72 ± 6.26 in the T-PRK group (P < 0.001). The two groups were not significantly different for gender (P = 0.367). After statistical adjustment, only the change in OSDI and NITBUT at 1-month remained significant between groups (adjusted P = 0.038 and P < 0.05, respectively). Effect sizes were small to moderate, and none of the differences exceeded minimal clinically important thresholds. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant between-groups differences. Age was identified as an independent predictor of OSDI change.

CONCLUSION

In short-term follow-up, both procedures induced some degree of DED. However, T-PRK was associated with slightly fewer signs and symptoms of dry eye disease, but the differences were not clinically significant.

摘要

目的

采用主观和客观测量相结合的方法,比较准分子原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)和经上皮准分子原位角膜磨镶术(T-PRK)术后的干眼疾病(DED)情况,重点关注具有临床意义的结果和调整后的统计模型。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了89例年龄超过20岁患者的眼睛,并分为PRK组(43只眼)和T-PRK组(46只眼)。主要结局是6个月时眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分的变化。次要结局包括非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NITBUT)和睑板腺可挤压性。还评估了诸如泪河高度(TMH)、眼红评分、泪河测量条(SM管)、睑板腺缺失和睑脂质量等探索性参数。对统计模型进行了基线年龄差异调整,并应用了多重比较校正。

结果

PRK组患者的平均年龄为34.16±7.23岁,T-PRK组为28.72±6.26岁(P<0.001)。两组性别差异无统计学意义(P=0.367)。经过统计调整后,仅1个月时OSDI和NITBUT的变化在组间仍具有显著性(调整后P分别为0.038和P<0.05)。效应大小为小到中度,且所有差异均未超过最小临床重要阈值。探索性分析显示组间无显著差异。年龄被确定为OSDI变化的独立预测因素。

结论

在短期随访中,两种手术均会引起一定程度的干眼疾病。然而,T-PRK相关的干眼疾病体征和症状略少,但差异无临床意义。

相似文献

1
Dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK): a comparative clinical study.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(T-PRK)后干眼的比较临床研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 20;45(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03626-y.
2
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)矫正近视的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD009799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009799.pub2.
3
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.
4
Impact of epithelial removal techniques on low contrast acuity after photorefractive keratectomy: A prospective randomized study.屈光性角膜切削术后上皮去除技术对低对比度视力的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2025 Jun;48(6):104514. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104514. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
Evaluation of the effect of artificial tears on corneal epithelial thickness changes after photorefractive keratectomy.评价人工泪液对光折射性角膜切削术后角膜上皮厚度变化的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):66-72. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1354_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
Comparative Analysis of Combined Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Crosslinking in Progressive Versus Stable Keratoconus.进行性与稳定性圆锥角膜中联合地形引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术和角膜交联术的对比分析
Cornea. 2024 Jul 31;44(8):983-991. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003653.
7
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub2.
8
The visual outcomes and corneal biomechanical properties after PRK and SMILE in low to moderate myopia.低至中度近视患者接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)和全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)后的视觉效果和角膜生物力学特性
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;73(1):128-133. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1250_24. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
Evidence for superior efficacy and safety of LASIK over photorefractive keratectomy for correction of myopia.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)在矫正近视方面比光性屈光性角膜切削术具有更高疗效和安全性的证据。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Nov;113(11):1897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.013.
10
Factors Predicting Slow Visual Recovery Following Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.近视性准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后视力恢复缓慢的预测因素
Cornea. 2024 Sep 24;44(8):946-951. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003710.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of eye drop retention time using fluorophotometry in three commercially available lubricant eye drops.三种市售润滑滴眼液在荧光光度法下的滴眼剂滞留时间比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2024 Sep 1;101(9):603-607. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002172. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Changes of dry eye parameters after small incision lenticule extraction surgery in patients with different ocular surface disease index scores.不同眼表疾病指数评分患者行小切口微透镜取出术后干眼参数的变化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49645-6.
3
Refractive surgery and dry eye - An update.
屈光手术与干眼:最新进展。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;71(4):1105-1114. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3406_22.
4
Anterior segment inflammation and its association with dry eye parameters following myopic SMILE and FS-LASIK.近视 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后前段炎症及其与干眼参数的相关性。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):689-695. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2181388.
5
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis.经上皮光性角膜切削术与传统光性角膜切削术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 23;2022:3022672. doi: 10.1155/2022/3022672. eCollection 2022.
6
Prevalence and Incidence of Dry Eye Disease in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.亚洲干眼症的患病率和发病率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ophthalmic Res. 2022;65(6):647-658. doi: 10.1159/000525696. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Evaluation of Dry Eye After Refractive Surgery According to Preoperative Meibomian Gland Status.根据术前睑板腺状态评估屈光手术后的干眼情况。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 25;9:833984. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.833984. eCollection 2022.
8
The Effect of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Treatment on Sleep Quality.睑板腺功能障碍治疗对睡眠质量的影响
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 22;33(3):272-276. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_171_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
9
Ability of non-invasive tear break-up time to determine tear instability in contact lens wearers.非侵入性泪膜破裂时间在隐形眼镜佩戴者中对泪膜不稳定的评估作用。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;42(3):959-968. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02079-3. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
Evaluation of preoperative dry eye in people undergoing corneal refractive surgery to correct myopia.对接受角膜屈光手术矫正近视患者术前干眼情况的评估。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 18;14(7):1047-1051. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.13. eCollection 2021.