• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海拔3874米处小切口基质透镜切除术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术相比的稳定性

Stability of small incision lenticule extraction over laser in situ keratomileusis at an altitude of 3874 m.

作者信息

Huang Yanming, Zhao Yuancheng, Chen Xiaofan, Zou Huan, Yuan Rongdi

机构信息

Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, 183th, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, China.

General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85740-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-85740-6
PMID:39814802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11735975/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) when ascending from near sea level to an altitude of 3874 m. The visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and biometric parameters of 20 normal subjects (40 eyes, controls) and 36 subjects who underwent corneal refractive surgery (35 eyes with SMILE and 36 eyes with LASIK) were examined in Chongqing (C, 500 m above sea level) and 7-10 days after a collective travel to Shigatse (S, 3874 m above sea level). SER and corneal thickness (CT) were choosed as main indicators of the stability of corneal refractive surgery at high altitude. The IOP decreased and CT increased from C to S, while VA and SER did not significantly change in the control subjects. The VA and IOP of both the SMILE and LASIK subjects did not significantly change at an altitude of 3874 m. At high altitudes, no significant difference in the SER was found among the SMILE subjects, while a significant myopic shift was found among the LASIK subjects. With an increase in the altitude of 3874 m in S, an obvious increase in CT was observed in subjects who underwent corneal refraction surgery. The increase in CT in the SMILE group was significantly less than the increase in CT in the LASIK group. In addition, the biometric parameters of the SMILE and LASIK subjects showed the same minor changes as those of the control subjects when exposed to high altitude. The VA, IOP and biometric parameters of the subjects who underwent SMILE and LASIK remained stable at an altitude of 3874 m. SMILE shows better stability than LASIK in the refractive state and CT when exposed to high altitude.Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (ID: 2022-No.084-1) and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (Study NO. ChiCTR2200059833) on 12/5/2022.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估小切口飞秒透镜切除术(SMILE)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)从近海平面上升至海拔3874米时的稳定性。对20名正常受试者(40只眼,对照组)以及36名接受角膜屈光手术的受试者(35只眼行SMILE,36只眼行LASIK)的视力(VA)、眼压(IOP)、等效球镜度(SER)和生物测量参数在重庆(C,海拔500米)以及集体前往日喀则(S,海拔3874米)7 - 10天后进行了检查。选择SER和角膜厚度(CT)作为高海拔地区角膜屈光手术稳定性的主要指标。从C到S,对照组的IOP降低而CT增加,而VA和SER没有显著变化。在海拔3874米时,SMILE组和LASIK组受试者的VA和IOP均无显著变化。在高海拔地区,SMILE组受试者的SER无显著差异,而LASIK组受试者出现了显著的近视性偏移。随着海拔升至S的3874米,接受角膜屈光手术的受试者CT明显增加。SMILE组CT的增加显著小于LASIK组CT的增加。此外,SMILE组和LASIK组受试者的生物测量参数在暴露于高海拔时与对照组受试者表现出相同的微小变化。接受SMILE和LASIK手术的受试者在海拔3874米时,其VA、IOP和生物测量参数保持稳定。在暴露于高海拔时,SMILE在屈光状态和CT方面比LASIK表现出更好的稳定性。试验注册:本研究经陆军军医大学第二附属医院伦理委员会批准(编号:2022 - No.084 - 1),并遵循赫尔辛基宣言的原则。该研究于2022年5月12日在http://www.chictr.org.cn注册(研究编号:ChiCTR2200059833)。

相似文献

1
Stability of small incision lenticule extraction over laser in situ keratomileusis at an altitude of 3874 m.海拔3874米处小切口基质透镜切除术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术相比的稳定性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85740-6.
2
Comparison of corneal consumption in correcting high with-the-rule astigmatism between refractive lenticule extraction and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.屈光性晶状体微切口摘出术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术矫正高度顺规散光时角膜切削量的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;263(4):1147-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06704-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis surgery.小切口微透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助角膜磨镶术术后屈光度和角膜曲率变化的比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;66(11):1562-1567. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_366_18.
4
A Comparative and Prospective Study of Corneal Consumption and Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK Performed on the Contralateral Eyes With High Myopic Astigmatism.高度近视散光患者双眼行 SMILE 与 FS-LASIK 术后角膜消耗与角膜生物力学的对比前瞻性研究
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.29.
5
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗近视的 5 年疗效比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 May;97(3):e373-e380. doi: 10.1111/aos.14017. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK.近视 LASIK、SMILE 和 TransPRK 术后残余屈光误差、眼像差和调节状态。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Oct 1;35(10):624-631. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190916-02.
8
Two-years results of small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for Myopia.小切口微透镜取出术与波前像差引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的两年疗效观察。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;96(2):e119-e126. doi: 10.1111/aos.13470. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.评估 SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视后中央角膜厚度预测值与实际值的差异。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1877310. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
10
Study of corneal and retinal thicknesses at five years after FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 治疗近视五年后角膜和视网膜厚度的研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03661-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Visual acuity assessment of central retinal artery occlusion patients with or without paracentral acute middle maculopathy via OCT-A.利用 OCT-A 评估伴有或不伴有旁中心急性中黄斑病变的视网膜中央动脉阻塞患者的视力。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03151-5.
2
Influencing factors of low vision 2 years after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: an observational study.增殖型糖尿病性视网膜病变玻璃体切除术后 2 年低视力的影响因素:一项观察性研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03071-4.
3
Intraocular Pressure Calculation in Myopic Patients After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后近视患者的眼压计算
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 21;14:509-516. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S239329. eCollection 2020.
4
Intraocular pressure and axial length changes during altitude acclimatization from Beijing to Lhasa.从北京到拉萨的高原适应过程中眼压和眼轴长度的变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228267. eCollection 2020.
5
Intraocular pressure changes in eyes with small incision lenticules and laser in situ keratomileusis.小切口透镜切除术和准分子原位角膜磨镶术患者眼内压的变化
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Jul;102(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12861. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Effect of High Altitude Exposure on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.使用Goldmann压平眼压计评估高海拔暴露对眼压的影响。
High Alt Med Biol. 2017 Jun;18(2):114-120. doi: 10.1089/ham.2016.0115. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)与飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 1;11(7):e0158176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158176. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)与全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)治疗近视引起的角膜形态变化和像差比较
J Refract Surg. 2015 Apr;31(4):223-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150303-01. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK.屈光手术后干眼:微切口晶状体提取术与 LASIK 的对比结果。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
10
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.