Puram Sidharth V, Kozin Elliott D, Sethi Rosh, Alkire Blake, Lee Daniel J, Gray Stacey T, Shrime Mark G, Cohen Michael
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):991-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24912. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Surgical education remains an important mission of academic medical centers. Financial pressures may favor improved operating room (OR) efficiency at the expense of teaching in the OR. We aim to evaluate factors, such as resident participation, associated with duration of total OR, as well as procedural time of common pediatric otolaryngologic cases.
Retrospective cohort study.
We reviewed resident and attending surgeon total OR and procedural times for isolated tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy (T&A), and bilateral myringotomy with tube insertion between 2009 and 2013. We included cases supervised or performed by one of four teaching surgeons in children with American Society of Anesthesiology classification < 3. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of procedural time.
We identified 3,922 procedures. Residents had significantly longer procedure times for all procedures compared to an attending surgeon (4.9-12.8 minutes, P < 0.001). Differences were proportional to case complexity. In T&A patients, older patient age and attending surgeon identity were also significant predictors of increased mean procedural time (P < 0.05).
Resident participation contributes to increased procedure time for common otolaryngology procedures. We found that differences in operative time between resident surgeons and attending surgeons are proportional to the complexity of the case, with additional factors, such as attending surgeon identity and older patient age, also influencing procedure times. Despite the increased procedural time, our investigation shows that resident education does not result in excessive operative times beyond what may be reasonably expected at a teaching institution.
目的/假设:外科教育仍然是学术性医学中心的一项重要使命。财务压力可能有利于提高手术室(OR)效率,但可能以牺牲手术室教学为代价。我们旨在评估与总手术室时长以及常见小儿耳鼻喉科手术的手术时间相关的因素,如住院医师参与情况。
回顾性队列研究。
我们回顾了2009年至2013年期间单纯扁桃体切除术、腺样体切除术、扁桃体腺样体切除术(T&A)以及双侧鼓膜切开置管术的住院医师和主刀医生的总手术室时长和手术时间。我们纳入了由四位教学医生之一监督或实施的、美国麻醉医师协会分级<3的儿童病例。采用回归分析来确定手术时间的预测因素。
我们确定了3922例手术。与主刀医生相比,住院医师进行所有手术的时间明显更长(4.9 - 12.8分钟,P < 0.001)。差异与病例复杂性成正比。在扁桃体腺样体切除术患者中,患者年龄较大和主刀医生身份也是平均手术时间增加的重要预测因素(P < 0.05)。
住院医师参与导致常见耳鼻喉科手术的手术时间增加。我们发现住院医师和主刀医生之间的手术时间差异与病例复杂性成正比,其他因素,如主刀医生身份和患者年龄较大,也会影响手术时间。尽管手术时间增加,但我们的调查表明,住院医师教育不会导致超出教学机构合理预期的过长手术时间。