Gorzelańczyk Edward Jacek, Fareed Ayman, Walecki Piotr, Feit Julia, Kunc Marek
Department of Theoretical Basis of Bio-Medical Sciences and Medical Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Institute of Philosophy, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Non-Public Health Care Center Sue Ryder Home, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Medseven-Outpatient Addiction Treatment, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Am J Addict. 2014 Nov-Dec;23(6):608-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12154.x. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
Evidence suggests that methadone may play a protective role in the faulty decision-making in heroin-addicted individuals. This may reduce craving for opioids and the risky decisions associated with active opioid use.
We tested the effect of a daily therapeutic dose of methadone on faulty decision-making in eighty (n = 80) individuals with a history of opioid addiction. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and compared the score and response time before and after the daily methadone dosing.
The mean net IGT score before methadone dose was 10 (±22) and 22 (±23) after methadone dose (t = 4.23, p = .00006). These results reflect statistically significant improvement in faulty decisions after the administration of the daily methadone dose. The mean response time for the reward cards before methadone dose were 1,856 ms (±871) and 1,465 ms (±851) after methadone dose (t = 2.55, p = .012). The mean response time for the punishment cards before methadone dose were 1,688 ms (±911) and 1,399 ms (±827) after methadone dose (t = 1.86, p = .065). These results reflect statistically significant improvement in response time to a rewarding healthy decisions after the administration of the daily methadone dose.
This is the first study to report the effect of a therapeutic dose of methadone on improving faulty decisions for individuals with a long history of opioids addiction. This study demonstrated that the time to making a healthy decision was significantly shorter as a result of administration of methadone.
有证据表明美沙酮可能在海洛因成瘾者的错误决策中发挥保护作用。这可能会减少对阿片类药物的渴望以及与活跃使用阿片类药物相关的冒险决策。
我们测试了每日治疗剂量的美沙酮对80名有阿片类药物成瘾史个体错误决策的影响。我们使用爱荷华赌博任务(IGT),并比较了每日美沙酮给药前后的得分和反应时间。
美沙酮给药前IGT平均净得分是10(±22),给药后是22(±23)(t = 4.23,p = 0.00006)。这些结果反映出每日美沙酮给药后错误决策有统计学上的显著改善。美沙酮给药前奖励卡片的平均反应时间是1856毫秒(±871),给药后是1465毫秒(±851)(t = 2.55,p = 0.012)。美沙酮给药前惩罚卡片的平均反应时间是1688毫秒(±911),给药后是1399毫秒(±827)(t = 1.86,p = 0.065)。这些结果反映出每日美沙酮给药后对有益健康决策的反应时间有统计学上的显著改善。
这是第一项报告治疗剂量美沙酮对有长期阿片类药物成瘾史个体改善错误决策影响的研究。本研究表明,由于服用美沙酮,做出健康决策的时间显著缩短。