• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替代物影响东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana)的食物偏好。

Phantom alternatives influence food preferences in the eastern honeybee Apis cerana.

作者信息

Tan Ken, Dong Shihao, Liu Xiwen, Chen Weiweng, Wang Yuchong, Oldroyd Benjamin P, Latty Tanya

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xufu Road 88, Kunming, 650223, Yunnan Province, China.

Eastern Bee Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):509-17. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12288. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1111/1365-2656.12288
PMID:25251672
Abstract

Most models of animal choice behaviour assume that desirable but unavailable options, such as a high quality, but inhabited nest sites, do not influence an individual's preferences for the remaining options. However, experiments suggest that in mammals, the mere presence of such 'phantom' alternatives can alter, and even reverse, an individual's preferences for other items in a choice set. Phantom alternatives may be widespread in nature, as they occur whenever a resource is visible, but unavailable at the time of choice. They are particularly relevant for nectar-foraging animals, where previously rewarding flowers may sometimes be empty. Here, we investigate the effect of phantom alternatives on feeder preferences in the eastern honeybee, Apis cerana. First, we tested the effects of unattractive and attractive phantom alternatives by presenting individual bees with either a binary choice set containing two feeders that differed strongly in two qualities, but were equally preferred overall ('option 1' and 'option 2'), or a ternary choice set containing option 1, option 2 and one of two phantom types (unattractive and attractive). Secondly, we determined whether phantoms increase (similarity effect) or decrease (dissimilarity effect) preference for phantom-similar choices. In binary trials, bees had no significant preference for option 1 or option 2. However, after encountering an attractive phantom alternative, individual bees preferred option 2. The unattractive phantom did not influence bee preferences. Phantoms consistently changed individual bee preferences in favour of the phantom-similar choice. This means that the presence of an attractive food source, even if it is unavailable, can influence preference relationships between remaining items in the choice set. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the potential for phantom effects when studying the foraging behaviour of animals. Our results are particularly relevant for nectarivores, where empty but previously rewarding flowers are a common occurrence. Since an increase in pollinator visits can result in higher seed set, our results open up the possibility that by shifting pollinator preferences, empty flowers could have otherwise-unpredicted influences on community composition, plant-pollinator interactions and pollinator behaviour.

摘要

大多数动物选择行为模型都假定,那些虽理想但无法获取的选项,比如高质量但已有其他动物居住的巢穴,不会影响个体对其余选项的偏好。然而,实验表明,在哺乳动物中,这类“虚幻”替代物的存在本身就能改变,甚至逆转个体对选择集中其他项目的偏好。虚幻替代物在自然界可能广泛存在,因为只要一种资源可见但在选择时无法获取,它们就会出现。这对于采食花蜜的动物尤为重要,因为之前有花蜜的花朵有时可能已无花蜜。在此,我们研究虚幻替代物对东方蜜蜂(中华蜜蜂)采食器偏好的影响。首先,我们通过向单只蜜蜂呈现二元选择集(包含两个在两种特性上差异很大但总体上同等受偏好的采食器,即“选项1”和“选项2”)或三元选择集(包含选项1、选项2以及两种虚幻类型之一,即无吸引力的和有吸引力的),来测试无吸引力和有吸引力的虚幻替代物的影响。其次,我们确定虚幻替代物是增加(相似性效应)还是降低(相异性效应)对与虚幻物相似的选择的偏好。在二元试验中,蜜蜂对选项1或选项2没有显著偏好。然而,在遇到有吸引力的虚幻替代物后,单只蜜蜂更偏好选项2。无吸引力的虚幻替代物未影响蜜蜂的偏好。虚幻替代物始终改变单只蜜蜂的偏好,使其更倾向于与虚幻物相似的选择。这意味着即使有吸引力的食物源无法获取,其存在也能影响选择集中其余项目之间的偏好关系。我们的研究结果凸显了在研究动物觅食行为时考虑虚幻效应可能性的重要性。我们的结果对于食蜜动物尤为相关,因为无花蜜但之前有花蜜的花朵很常见。由于传粉者访花次数增加可导致更高的结实率,我们的结果开启了一种可能性,即通过改变传粉者偏好,无花蜜的花朵可能对群落组成、植物 - 传粉者相互作用和传粉者行为产生意想不到的影响。

相似文献

1
Phantom alternatives influence food preferences in the eastern honeybee Apis cerana.替代物影响东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana)的食物偏好。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):509-17. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12288. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
2
Foraging choices balanced between resource abundance and handling concerns: how the honeybee, Apis mellifera, select the flowers of Robinia pseudoacacia.觅食选择在资源丰富度和处理成本之间取得平衡:蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)如何选择刺槐的花朵。
Bull Entomol Res. 2019 Jun;109(3):316-324. doi: 10.1017/S0007485318000561. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
How Efficient Is Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Pollinating Cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata? Pollination Behavior, Pollinator Effectiveness, Pollinator Requirement, and Impact of Pollination.中华蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)对结球甘蓝(Brassica oleracea var. capitata)的授粉效率如何?授粉行为、传粉者效能、传粉者需求及授粉影响
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Jun 1;110(3):826-834. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox115.
4
Amino acid and carbohydrate tradeoffs by honey bee nectar foragers and their implications for plant-pollinator interactions.蜜蜂采蜜工蜂的氨基酸与碳水化合物权衡及其对植物-传粉者相互作用的影响
J Insect Physiol. 2014 Oct;69:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Fearful foragers: honey bees tune colony and individual foraging to multi-predator presence and food quality.担惊受怕的觅食者:蜜蜂会根据多种捕食者的存在和食物质量来调整蜂群和个体的觅食行为。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e75841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075841. eCollection 2013.
6
Native Honey Bees Outperform Adventive Honey Bees in Increasing Pyrus bretschneideri (Rosales: Rosaceae) Pollination.本土蜜蜂在提高砀山梨(蔷薇目:蔷薇科)授粉效率方面优于外来蜜蜂。
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Dec 5;110(6):2290-2294. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox286.
7
A comparative analysis of colour preferences in temperate and tropical social bees.温带和热带群居蜜蜂颜色偏好的比较分析
Naturwissenschaften. 2018 Jan 2;105(1-2):8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1531-z.
8
Economic foraging in a floral marketplace: asymmetrically dominated decoy effects in bumblebees.在花卉市场中的经济觅食:熊蜂中不对称主导的诱饵效应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Sep;291(2031):20240843. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0843. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
9
Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds.觅食蜂鸟决策过程中的个体差异。
Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt B:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
10
Octopamine influences honey bee foraging preference.章鱼胺影响蜜蜂的觅食偏好。
J Insect Physiol. 2007 Jul;53(7):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic foraging in a floral marketplace: asymmetrically dominated decoy effects in bumblebees.在花卉市场中的经济觅食:熊蜂中不对称主导的诱饵效应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Sep;291(2031):20240843. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0843. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Available and unavailable decoys in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) decision-making.卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)决策中的可用和不可用诱饵。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Feb 23;27(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01860-y.
3
To eat, or not to eat: a phantom decoy affects information-gathering behavior by a free-ranging mammalian herbivore.
吃,还是不吃:一个虚拟诱饵对一种自由放养的食草哺乳动物的信息收集行为产生影响。
Behav Ecol. 2023 Jul 27;34(5):759-768. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad057. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
4
Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant.捆绑和隔离会影响蚂蚁信息素的沉积,但不会影响其选择。
Elife. 2022 Nov 22;11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314.
5
Trail Pheromone Does Not Modulate Subjective Reward Evaluation in Ants.踪迹信息素不会调节蚂蚁的主观奖励评估。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:555576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555576. eCollection 2020.
6
Individual honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers adjust their fuel load to match variability in forage reward.单个中华蜜蜂觅食者会调整其携带的能量负载,以匹配觅食回报的变化。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 9;5:16418. doi: 10.1038/srep16418.