Barnes Rebecca T, Gallagher Morgan E, Masiello Caroline A, Liu Zuolin, Dugan Brandon
Department of Earth Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e108340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108340. eCollection 2014.
The addition of charcoal (or biochar) to soil has significant carbon sequestration and agronomic potential, making it important to determine how this potentially large anthropogenic carbon influx will alter ecosystem functions. We used column experiments to quantify how hydrologic and nutrient-retention characteristics of three soil materials differed with biochar amendment. We compared three homogeneous soil materials (sand, organic-rich topsoil, and clay-rich Hapludert) to provide a basic understanding of biochar-soil-water interactions. On average, biochar amendment decreased saturated hydraulic conductivity (K) by 92% in sand and 67% in organic soil, but increased K by 328% in clay-rich soil. The change in K for sand was not predicted by the accompanying physical changes to the soil mixture; the sand-biochar mixture was less dense and more porous than sand without biochar. We propose two hydrologic pathways that are potential drivers for this behavior: one through the interstitial biochar-sand space and a second through pores within the biochar grains themselves. This second pathway adds to the porosity of the soil mixture; however, it likely does not add to the effective soil K due to its tortuosity and smaller pore size. Therefore, the addition of biochar can increase or decrease soil drainage, and suggests that any potential improvement of water delivery to plants is dependent on soil type, biochar amendment rate, and biochar properties. Changes in dissolved carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes also differed; with biochar increasing the C flux from organic-poor sand, decreasing it from organic-rich soils, and retaining small amounts of soil-derived N. The aromaticity of C lost from sand and clay increased, suggesting lost C was biochar-derived; though the loss accounts for only 0.05% of added biochar-C. Thus, the direction and magnitude of hydraulic, C, and N changes associated with biochar amendments are soil type (composition and particle size) dependent.
向土壤中添加木炭(或生物炭)具有显著的碳固存和农艺潜力,因此确定这种潜在的大量人为碳流入将如何改变生态系统功能非常重要。我们使用柱实验来量化三种土壤材料的水文和养分保留特性在添加生物炭后的差异。我们比较了三种均质土壤材料(沙子、富含有机质的表土和富含粘土的简育湿润老成土),以初步了解生物炭 - 土壤 - 水之间的相互作用。平均而言,添加生物炭使沙子的饱和导水率(K)降低了92%,使有机土壤的饱和导水率降低了67%,但使富含粘土的土壤的饱和导水率增加了328%。沙子的K变化无法通过土壤混合物伴随的物理变化来预测;沙子 - 生物炭混合物比不含生物炭的沙子密度更小、孔隙更多。我们提出了两种水文途径,它们可能是导致这种行为的驱动因素:一种是通过生物炭 - 沙子的间隙空间,另一种是通过生物炭颗粒本身的孔隙。第二条途径增加了土壤混合物的孔隙度;然而,由于其曲折度和较小的孔径,它可能不会增加土壤的有效导水率。因此,添加生物炭可以增加或减少土壤排水,这表明向植物供水的任何潜在改善都取决于土壤类型、生物炭添加率和生物炭特性。溶解碳(C)和氮(N)通量的变化也有所不同;生物炭增加了贫有机沙子中的碳通量,降低了富含有机质土壤中的碳通量,并保留了少量土壤来源的氮。从沙子和粘土中流失的碳的芳香性增加,表明流失的碳来自生物炭;尽管这种损失仅占添加生物炭碳的0.05%。因此,与生物炭添加相关的水力、碳和氮变化的方向和幅度取决于土壤类型(组成和粒径)。