Chaffin Brian C, Mahler Robert L, Wulfhorst J D, Shafii Bahman
College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, OR, 97331-5503, USA,
Environ Manage. 2015 Jan;55(1):56-68. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0367-y. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
Collaborative watershed group experiences reveal commonalities in their approaches to facilitate decentralized and inclusive watershed planning and management in the United States, and increasingly around the world. Although watershed groups are widely recognized in the United States for positive accomplishments across local, state, and regional scales, the role of government agencies as watershed group partners often remains ambiguous and inconsistent. This paper details results of a survey used to determine the status of Pacific Northwest (PNW) watershed group-agency partnerships relative to planning and management. Specific inquiry was directed toward: (1) the role of technical information flow; and (2) watershed group needs. Mail surveys were administered to 304 watershed group participants in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Sixty-nine percent of the surveys were completed and returned. Based on the collected survey data, PNW watershed groups rely heavily on agency officials for technical watershed information. Respondents perceive support of state government to be the highest relative to federal agencies, local governments, and university Extension offices. However, evidence from the survey suggests that partnerships are underutilized across all agencies and organizations concurrently vested in watershed planning and management in the PNW. Sustained operational funding, increased group participation, and baseline watershed data are the most pressing needs of PNW watershed groups and present a significant opportunity for expanding watershed group-agency partnerships.
协作性流域组织的经验揭示了美国以及全球范围内在促进分散化和包容性流域规划与管理方面的共同方法。尽管流域组织在美国地方、州和区域层面的积极成就得到广泛认可,但政府机构作为流域组织伙伴的角色往往仍不明确且不一致。本文详细介绍了一项调查的结果,该调查旨在确定太平洋西北地区(PNW)流域组织与机构伙伴关系在规划和管理方面的状况。具体调查方向为:(1)技术信息流的作用;(2)流域组织的需求。对爱达荷州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州的304名流域组织参与者进行了邮件调查。69%的调查问卷被填写并返回。根据收集到的调查数据,太平洋西北地区的流域组织在很大程度上依赖机构官员获取流域技术信息。与联邦机构、地方政府和大学推广办公室相比,受访者认为州政府的支持力度最大。然而,调查证据表明,在太平洋西北地区同时参与流域规划和管理的所有机构和组织中,伙伴关系的利用程度都不高。持续的运营资金、更多的组织参与以及流域基线数据是太平洋西北地区流域组织最迫切的需求,也为扩大流域组织与机构的伙伴关系提供了重要机遇。