Bando K, Takahashi H, Kinbara M, Tanaka Y, Kuroishi T, Sasaki K, Takano-Yamamoto T, Sugawara S, Endo Y
Division of Molecular Regulation Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Division of Molecular Regulation Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
J Dent Res. 2014 Nov;93(11):1101-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034514552674. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Resin monomers (RMs) are inflammatory agents and are thought to cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, mouse models are lacking, possibly because of the weak antigenicities of RMs. We previously reported that inflammatory substances can promote the allergic dermatitis (AD) induced by intradermally injected nickel (Ni-AD) in mice. Here, we examined the effects of RMs on Ni-AD. To sensitize mice to Ni, a mixture containing non-toxic concentrations of NiCl2 and an RM [either methyl methacrylate (MMA) or 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)] was injected intraperitoneally or into ear-pinnae intradermally. Ten days later, a mixture containing various concentrations of NiCl2 and/or an RM was intradermally injected into ear-pinnae, and ear-swelling was measured. In adoptive transfer experiments, spleen cells from sensitized mice were transferred intravenously into non-sensitized recipients, and 24 h later NiCl2 was challenged to ear-pinnae. Whether injected intraperitoneally or intradermally, RM plus NiCl2 mixtures were effective in sensitizing mice to Ni. AD-inducing Ni concentrations were greatly reduced in the presence of MMA or HEMA (at the sensitization step from 10 mM to 5 or 50 µM, respectively, and at the elicitation step from 10 µM to 10 or 100 nM, respectively). These effects of RMs were weaker in IL-1-knockout mice and in macrophage-depleted mice. Cell-transfer experiments in IL-1-knockout mice indicated that both the sensitization and elicitation steps depended on IL-1. Challenge with an RM alone did not induce allergic ear-swelling in mice given the same RM + NiCl2 10 days before the challenge. These results suggest that RMs act as adjuvants, not as antigens, to promote Ni-AD by reducing the AD-inducing concentration of Ni, and that IL-1 and macrophages are critically important for the adjuvant effects. We speculate that what were previously thought of as "RM-ACD" might include ACD caused by antigens other than RMs that have undergone promotion by the adjuvant effects of RMs.
树脂单体(RMs)是炎症介质,被认为可引起过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)。然而,目前缺乏小鼠模型,这可能是由于RMs的抗原性较弱。我们之前报道过,炎症物质可促进小鼠皮内注射镍诱导的过敏性皮炎(Ni-AD)。在此,我们研究了RMs对Ni-AD的影响。为使小鼠对镍致敏,将含有无毒浓度的NiCl2和一种RMs [甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)或甲基丙烯酸2-羟乙酯(HEMA)]的混合物腹腔注射或皮内注射到耳廓中。10天后,将含有不同浓度的NiCl2和/或一种RMs的混合物皮内注射到耳廓中,并测量耳肿胀情况。在过继转移实验中,将致敏小鼠的脾细胞静脉注射到未致敏的受体小鼠体内,24小时后对耳廓进行NiCl2激发。无论腹腔注射还是皮内注射,RMs加NiCl2混合物均能有效使小鼠对镍致敏。在存在MMA或HEMA的情况下(致敏步骤时,分别从10 mM降至5或50 μM;激发步骤时,分别从10 μM降至10或100 nM),诱导AD的镍浓度大幅降低。RMs的这些作用在IL-1基因敲除小鼠和巨噬细胞耗竭的小鼠中较弱。在IL-1基因敲除小鼠中进行的细胞转移实验表明,致敏和激发步骤均依赖于IL-1。在激发前10天给予相同的RMs + NiCl2的小鼠中,单独用一种RMs激发不会诱导过敏性耳肿胀。这些结果表明,RMs作为佐剂而非抗原,通过降低诱导AD的镍浓度来促进Ni-AD,并且IL-1和巨噬细胞对佐剂作用至关重要。我们推测,以前被认为是“RM-ACD”的情况可能包括由RMs的佐剂作用促进其免疫反应的非RMs抗原引起的ACD。