• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研讨会上教学表现的调查;一项采用多层次方法的问卷调查研究。

Investigating teaching performance in seminars; a questionnaire study with a multi-level approach.

作者信息

Spruijt Annemarie, Leppink Jimmie, Wolfhagen Ineke, Scherpbier Albert, van Beukelen Peter, Jaarsma Debbie

机构信息

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 24;14:203. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-203.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-203
PMID:25253047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4190460/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teachers play an important role in seminars as facilitators and content experts. However, contextual factors like students' preparation, group size, group interaction, and content appear to influence their performance. Understanding the impact of these contextual factors on students' perception of teaching performance may help to further understand seminar teaching. Besides that, it may help curriculum organisers and teachers to get more insight in how to optimise their versatile role in seminars. The aim of this study is to investigate how students' perception of teaching performance in seminars is explained by students' extent of preparation, seminar group size, group interaction, and content.

METHODS

The Utrecht Seminar Evaluation (USEME) questionnaire was used to collect information on teaching performance and the aforementioned explanatory variables. To account for intra-student, intra-seminar, and intra-teacher correlation in the data, multilevel regression was used to analyse 988 completed questionnaires in 80 seminars with 36 different teachers.

RESULTS

Group interaction and seminar content had large (B = 0.418) and medium (B = 0.212) positive effects on perceived teaching performance scores, whereas the effects of students' preparation (B = -0.055) and group size (B = -0.130) were small and negative.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides curriculum organisers and teachers indications on how to optimise variables that influence perceived teaching performance in seminars. It is suggested that teachers should search for the most appropriate combination of motivating and challenging content and facilitation method within seminars to optimise discussion opportunities between students.

摘要

背景

教师在研讨会上作为促进者和内容专家发挥着重要作用。然而,诸如学生准备情况、小组规模、小组互动和内容等情境因素似乎会影响他们的表现。了解这些情境因素对学生对教学表现的看法的影响,可能有助于进一步理解研讨教学。除此之外,它还可以帮助课程组织者和教师更深入地了解如何在研讨会上优化他们的多重角色。本研究的目的是调查学生准备程度、研讨小组规模、小组互动和内容如何解释学生对研讨会上教学表现的看法。

方法

使用乌得勒支研讨会评估(USEME)问卷来收集有关教学表现和上述解释变量的信息。为了考虑数据中的学生内、研讨会内和教师内相关性,使用多层回归分析了来自80个研讨会、36位不同教师的988份完整问卷。

结果

小组互动和研讨会内容对感知教学表现得分有较大(B = 0.418)和中等(B = 0.212)的积极影响,而学生准备情况(B = -0.055)和小组规模(B = -0.130)的影响较小且为负面。

结论

本研究为课程组织者和教师提供了有关如何优化影响研讨会上感知教学表现的变量的指示。建议教师应在研讨会上寻找激励性和挑战性内容与促进方法的最合适组合,以优化学生之间的讨论机会。

相似文献

1
Investigating teaching performance in seminars; a questionnaire study with a multi-level approach.研讨会上教学表现的调查;一项采用多层次方法的问卷调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 24;14:203. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-203.
2
Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study.同伴指导的研讨会出勤与更好的准备、更深入的学习和更高的考试成绩相关:一项调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 9;16:200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0715-0.
3
Factors Influencing Seminar Learning and Academic Achievement.影响研讨会学习与学术成就的因素。
J Vet Med Educ. 2015 Fall;42(3):259-70. doi: 10.3138/jvme.1114-119R2. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Teachers' perceptions of aspects affecting seminar learning: a qualitative study.教师对影响研讨学习的因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 12;13:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-22.
5
Perceptions of learning as a function of seminar group factors.将学习视为研讨小组因素的一种函数的认知。
Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03170.x.
6
Students' and teachers' perceived and actual verbal interactions in seminar groups.学生和教师在研讨小组中所感知到的以及实际发生的言语互动。
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):368-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03301.x.
7
Evaluation of a vaccination seminar in regard to medical students' attitudes and their theoretical and practical vaccination-specific competencies.关于医学生态度及其理论和实践疫苗接种特定能力的疫苗接种研讨会评估。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc38. doi: 10.3205/zma001331. eCollection 2020.
8
Five teacher profiles in student-centred curricula based on their conceptions of learning and teaching.基于学习与教学理念的以学生为中心的课程中的五位教师简介。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 16;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-220.
9
Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators.动机、自我效能感和情境因素对临床教育工作者教学质量的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 8;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0923-2.
10
Medical students' and clinical teachers' perceptions of Māori health teaching.医学生和临床教师对毛利人健康教学的看法。
N Z Med J. 2013 Jun 28;126(1377):41-50.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Script Concordance Testing on Clinical Decision-Making in Paramedic Education.脚本一致性测试对护理人员教育中临床决策的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 22;12(2):282. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020282.
2
[Quality management in a postgraduate refresher course in otolaryngology].[耳鼻喉科研究生进修课程中的质量管理]
HNO. 2021 Jul;69(7):568-574. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01065-6. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Transitioning to Web-Based Learning in Basic Life Support Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Battle the Fear of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Presentation of Novel Methods.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,将基本生命支持培训转移到基于网络的学习以应对院外心脏骤停的恐惧:新方法介绍。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 25;23(5):e27108. doi: 10.2196/27108.

本文引用的文献

1
Why should I prepare? A mixed method study exploring the motives of medical undergraduate students to prepare for clinical skills training sessions.为什么我要准备?一项混合方法研究,探讨医学本科生准备临床技能培训课程的动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 22;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-27.
2
Teachers' perceptions of aspects affecting seminar learning: a qualitative study.教师对影响研讨学习的因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 12;13:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-22.
3
Students' perceptions of aspects affecting seminar learning.学生对影响研讨学习的各方面的看法。
Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e129-35. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644829.
4
Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide No. 48.有效的小组学习:AMEE 指南第 48 号。
Med Teach. 2010;32(9):715-26. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.505454.
5
Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.采用 360 度多源反馈模型评估教学和专业精神。
Med Teach. 2009 Dec;31(12):1073-80. doi: 10.3109/01421590802572775.
6
Perceptions of learning as a function of seminar group factors.将学习视为研讨小组因素的一种函数的认知。
Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03170.x.
7
Student perceptions of effective small group teaching.学生对有效的小组教学的看法。
Med Educ. 2004 Mar;38(3):286-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01772.x.
8
Developing the teaching instinct. 11: Small group learning.培养教学本能。11:小组学习。
Med Teach. 2004 Feb;26(1):16-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590310001648122.
9
Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research.基于问题的学习中导师研究的趋势:对教育实践和研究的结论与启示
Med Teach. 2002 Mar;24(2):173-80. doi: 10.1080/01421590220125277.
10
Relationship of tutors' group-dynamics skills to their performance ratings in problem-based learning.基于问题的学习中导师的团队动力学技能与其绩效评级的关系。
Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):473-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200105000-00020.