Hegg Ryan M, Kurup Anil Nicholas, Schmit Grant D, Weisbrod Adam J, Atwell Thomas D, Olivier Kenneth R, Moynihan Timothy J, Callstrom Matthew R
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1665-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
To determine safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of sternal metastases for pain palliation and local tumor control.
A tumor ablation database was retrospectively reviewed for sternal cryoablation procedures performed between January 2005 and June 2013, which yielded 15 procedures to treat 12 sternal metastases in 12 patients (five men). Median patient age was 57 years (range, 38-80 y). Metastases arose from five primary sites (breast, lung, kidney, ampulla, and thyroid), and median tumor size was 3.8 cm (range, 2.2-7.5 cm). Seven patients (58%) underwent cryoablation for pain palliation, and five (42%) underwent cryoablation for local tumor control of oligometastatic disease. Clinical outcomes (including complications, local tumor control, and pain response) were evaluated retrospectively.
Mean pain scores decreased from 7.0 ± 1.9 (median, 7; range, 4-10) at baseline to 1.8 ± 1.2 (median, 1.5; range, 0-4) following cryoablation (P = .00049). Two patients had durable pain palliation, and four had greater than 1 month of pain relief, with a median duration of 5.7 months (range, 1.5-14.7 mo). Two patients in whom recurrent pain developed underwent repeat cryoablation, with durable pain relief. Allowing for a single repeat treatment, local tumor control was achieved in four of five patients (80%) treated for this indication, with median follow-up of 8.4 months (range, 2.6-13.6 mo). In one patient (8%), an infectious complication developed that was successfully treated with antibiotics on an outpatient basis.
Cryoablation is a safe and potentially effective treatment for patients with painful sternal metastases and can achieve local tumor control in select patients.
确定冷冻消融胸骨转移瘤以缓解疼痛和控制局部肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
回顾性分析2005年1月至2013年6月间进行的胸骨冷冻消融手术的肿瘤消融数据库,共15例手术,治疗12例患者(5例男性)的12处胸骨转移瘤。患者中位年龄57岁(范围38 - 80岁)。转移瘤来自5个原发部位(乳腺、肺、肾、壶腹和甲状腺),肿瘤中位大小为3.8 cm(范围2.2 - 7.5 cm)。7例患者(58%)接受冷冻消融以缓解疼痛,5例患者(42%)接受冷冻消融以控制寡转移疾病的局部肿瘤。回顾性评估临床结果(包括并发症、局部肿瘤控制和疼痛反应)。
冷冻消融后,平均疼痛评分从基线时的7.0±1.9(中位数7;范围4 - 10)降至1.8±1.2(中位数1.5;范围0 - 4)(P = 0.00049)。2例患者疼痛得到持久缓解,4例患者疼痛缓解超过1个月,中位缓解持续时间为5.7个月(范围1.5 - 14.7个月)。2例复发性疼痛患者接受了重复冷冻消融,疼痛得到持久缓解。考虑单次重复治疗,5例因该适应证接受治疗的患者中有4例(80%)实现了局部肿瘤控制,中位随访时间为8.4个月(范围2.6 - 13.6个月)。1例患者(8%)发生感染性并发症,门诊使用抗生素成功治疗。
冷冻消融对于胸骨转移瘤疼痛患者是一种安全且可能有效的治疗方法,并且在部分患者中可实现局部肿瘤控制。