• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期勒瓦娄哇技术与南高加索地区下更新世至中更新世过渡。

Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, Unit 1176, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Department of Archaeology, University of Winchester, Winchester, SO22 4NR, UK.

出版信息

Science. 2014 Sep 26;345(6204):1609-13. doi: 10.1126/science.1256484.

DOI:10.1126/science.1256484
PMID:25258079
Abstract

The Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition (~400,000 to 200,000 years ago) is marked by technical, behavioral, and anatomical changes among hominin populations throughout Africa and Eurasia. The replacement of bifacial stone tools, such as handaxes, by tools made on flakes detached from Levallois cores documents the most important conceptual shift in stone tool production strategies since the advent of bifacial technology more than one million years earlier and has been argued to result from the expansion of archaic Homo sapiens out of Africa. Our data from Nor Geghi 1, Armenia, record the earliest synchronic use of bifacial and Levallois technology outside Africa and are consistent with the hypothesis that this transition occurred independently within geographically dispersed, technologically precocious hominin populations with a shared technological ancestry.

摘要

下更新世至中更新世过渡时期(约 40 万年至 20 万年前),标志着非洲和欧亚大陆各地人类种群在技术、行为和解剖结构上发生了变化。从两面石器(如手斧)到用从勒瓦娄哇核上剥落的石片制作的工具的转变,记录了自 100 多万年前双面技术出现以来石器制作策略最重要的概念转变,有人认为这是由于古老的智人从非洲扩张所致。我们在亚美尼亚的诺盖吉 1 号遗址获得的数据记录了最早在非洲以外地区同时使用两面技术和勒瓦娄哇技术,这与以下假设一致,即这种转变是在具有共同技术渊源的、地理上分散的、技术先进的人类种群中独立发生的。

相似文献

1
Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus.早期勒瓦娄哇技术与南高加索地区下更新世至中更新世过渡。
Science. 2014 Sep 26;345(6204):1609-13. doi: 10.1126/science.1256484.
2
The emergence of the Levallois technology in the Levant: A view from the Early Middle Paleolithic site of Misliya Cave, Israel.黎凡特地区勒瓦娄哇技术的出现:来自以色列米斯里亚洞早期中石器时代遗址的观点。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102785. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102785. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Acheulo-Yabrudian and Early Middle Paleolithic at Hayonim Cave (Western Galilee, Israel): Continuity or break?阿舍利-雅布若文化期和中更新世早期在海诺姆洞(以色列加利利西部):连续还是断裂?
J Hum Evol. 2020 Feb;139:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102733. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Early Levallois core technology between Marine Isotope Stage 12 and 9 in Western Europe.西欧中更新世 12 期至 9 期之间的早期勒瓦娄哇技术。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Feb;139:102735. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102735. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
On the industrial attributions of the Aterian and Mousterian of the Maghreb.论马格里布阿替林和莫斯特文化的工业属性。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Mar;64(3):194-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.010. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
6
Population structure and the evolution of Homo sapiens in Africa.非洲的人类种群结构与进化。
Evol Anthropol. 2019 Jul;28(4):179-188. doi: 10.1002/evan.21788. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
7
Hovk 1 and the Middle and Upper Paleolithic of Armenia: a preliminary framework.霍夫克一号与亚美尼亚的旧石器时代中晚期:一个初步框架。
J Hum Evol. 2008 Nov;55(5):803-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
8
Are Victoria West cores "proto-Levallois"? A phylogenetic assessment.维多利亚西部的石核是“原勒瓦娄哇式”的吗?一项系统发育评估。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Feb;56(2):175-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
9
Continuities in stone flaking technology at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia.印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯岛梁布亚石器技术的连续性。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):503-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
The earliest modern humans outside Africa.最早的非洲以外的现代人类。
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):456-459. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8369.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep-rooted Indian Middle Palaeolithic: Terminal Middle Pleistocene lithic assemblage from Retlapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India.印度中更新世深处的石器工业:来自印度安得拉邦雷特拉帕勒的中更新世末期石器组合。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0302580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302580. eCollection 2024.
2
The Middle Pleistocene human metatarsal from Sedia del Diavolo (Rome, Italy).来自意大利罗马迪亚沃洛隘口的中更新世人类跖骨。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):6024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55045-1.
3
Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia.
欧亚大陆最早的尼安德特人核心技术:对东亚早期人类能力和扩散的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2313123121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313123121. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Measuring ancient technological complexity and its cognitive implications using Petri nets.使用 Petri 网测量古代技术的复杂性及其认知意义。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):14961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42078-1.
5
Learner-driven innovation in the stone tool technology of early .早期石器工具技术中由学习者驱动的创新。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Jul 10;2:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.40. eCollection 2020.
6
Every contact leaves a trace: Documenting contamination in lithic residue studies at the Middle Palaeolithic sites of Lusakert Cave 1 (Armenia) and Crvena Stijena (Montenegro).每一次接触都会留下痕迹:记录卢萨卡特 1 号洞穴(亚美尼亚)和红石山(黑山)中石器时代遗址中石器残留物的污染情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266362. eCollection 2022.
7
Materiality, Agency and Evolution of Lithic Technology: an Integrated Perspective for Palaeolithic Archaeology.石器技术的重要性、能动性与演变:旧石器时代考古学的综合视角
J Archaeol Method Theory. 2021;28(2):617-670. doi: 10.1007/s10816-020-09483-6. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Middle Pleistocene fire use: The first signal of widespread cultural diffusion in human evolution.中更新世用火:人类进化中广泛文化扩散的第一个信号。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 3;118(31). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101108118.
9
New insights into early MIS 5 lithic technological behavior in the Levant: Nesher Ramla, Israel as a case study.黎凡特地区早期中石器时代石器技术行为的新见解:以以色列内瑟雷姆拉为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0231109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231109. eCollection 2020.
10
Ancient human genome-wide data from a 3000-year interval in the Caucasus corresponds with eco-geographic regions.高加索地区 3000 年跨度的古人类全基因组数据与生态地理区域相对应。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 4;10(1):590. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08220-8.