• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压成人中新发痛风的情况。

Comparison of new-onset gout in adults prescribed chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):864-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12413. Epub 2014 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/jch.12413
PMID:25258088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8031516/
Abstract

This study assessed the risk of new-onset gout following prescribing of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) compared with chlorthalidone (CTD). This retrospective cohort analysis used administrative claims from 2000 to 2012 to identify patients aged 18 to 89 years with hypertension who were prescribed CTD or HCTZ. Patients were excluded if they had a prior diagnosis of gout, conditions or prescription claims for medications that alter risk of gout, or if they switched between these two diuretics. A total of 1011 patients prescribed CTD were matched with 2022 patients prescribed HCTZ based on age, sex, and Chronic Condition Indicator. New-onset gout occurred in 17 of 1011 (1.68%) patients in the CTD group and in 26 of 2022 (1.29%) patients in the HCTZ group (P=.27). The number of days to first occurrence of gout was 183.6 days and 152.7 days in the CTD and HCTZ groups, respectively (P=.39). The mean daily dose was 22.7 mg for CTD and 24.3 mg for HCTZ, and the median dose of both CTD and HCTZ was 25 mg at the time of new-onset gout. Patients prescribed CTD for hypertension have a similar risk of developing new-onset gout compared with patients prescribed similar doses of HCTZ.

摘要

本研究评估了与氯噻酮(CTD)相比,氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)处方后新发痛风的风险。这项回顾性队列分析使用了 2000 年至 2012 年的行政索赔数据,以确定年龄在 18 至 89 岁之间的高血压患者,这些患者被处方 CTD 或 HCTZ。如果患者有痛风的既往诊断、改变痛风风险的药物的条件或处方索赔,或者如果他们在这两种利尿剂之间切换,则将其排除在外。根据年龄、性别和慢性病指标,将 1011 名被处方 CTD 的患者与 2022 名被处方 HCTZ 的患者进行匹配。在 CTD 组的 1011 名患者中有 17 名(1.68%)发生新发痛风,在 HCTZ 组的 2022 名患者中有 26 名(1.29%)发生新发痛风(P=.27)。痛风首次发生的天数分别为 CTD 组的 183.6 天和 HCTZ 组的 152.7 天(P=.39)。CTD 的平均日剂量为 22.7mg,HCTZ 的平均日剂量为 24.3mg,新发痛风时 CTD 和 HCTZ 的中位剂量均为 25mg。与处方相似剂量 HCTZ 的患者相比,处方 CTD 治疗高血压的患者新发痛风的风险相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison of new-onset gout in adults prescribed chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.比较氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压成人中新发痛风的情况。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):864-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12413. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
2
Chlorthalidone reduces cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide: a retrospective cohort analysis.氯噻酮比氢氯噻嗪更能降低心血管事件:一项回顾性队列分析。
Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):689-94. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.161505. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-CV Events: Did the Design Influence the Outcome?氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压-CV 事件:设计是否影响结果?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2023 Oct;71(10):93. doi: 10.59556/japi.71.0328.
4
Superior antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide.氯噻酮优于氢氯噻嗪的降压和心脏保护作用。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2021 Apr;57(4):291-301. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3266245.
5
Evidence-based diuretics: focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide.循证利尿剂:聚焦氯噻酮和吲达帕胺
Future Cardiol. 2015 Mar;11(2):203-17. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.83.
6
Long-term effects of chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide on electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.多项危险因素干预试验中氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪对心电图左心室肥厚的长期影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Dec;58(6):1001-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.181248. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
7
Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone in the management of hypertension.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮治疗高血压的比较。
Cardiol Rev. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c61b52.
8
Chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide for preventing cardiovascular disease in hypertension: Is the case closed?氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪用于预防高血压患者心血管疾病:定论已成?
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2023 Sep-Oct;73:84-85. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.07.003. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
9
Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension Treatment After Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗心肌梗死后或中风后的高血压:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11081.
10
Comparative antiplatelet effects of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide.氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪的抗血小板作用比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Oct;24(10):1310-1315. doi: 10.1111/jch.14564. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of the prescribing trend of thiazide-type and thiazide-like diuretics in hypertension: A UK perspective.噻嗪类和噻嗪样利尿剂在高血压中的处方趋势综述:英国视角。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;85(12):2707-2713. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14109. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
Obesity, hypertension and diuretic use as risk factors for incident gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.肥胖、高血压和利尿剂的使用是痛风发病的危险因素:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jul 5;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1612-1.
3
Changes in selected metabolic parameters in patients over 65 receiving hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride, atenolol or placebo in the MRC elderly trial.在医学研究委员会(MRC)老年人试验中,65岁以上接受氢氯噻嗪加阿米洛利、阿替洛尔或安慰剂治疗的患者选定代谢参数的变化。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0368-2.
4
Hydrochlorothiazide is not the most useful nor versatile thiazide diuretic.氢氯噻嗪并非最有用或最具通用性的噻嗪类利尿剂。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2015 Jul;30(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000178.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of diuretics and risk of incident gout: a population-based case-control study.利尿剂的使用与痛风事件风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;66(1):185-96. doi: 10.1002/art.38203.
2
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
3
Health-related quality of life in gout: a systematic review.痛风患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Nov;52(11):2031-40. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket265. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
4
Clinical and health care use characteristics of patients newly starting allopurinol, febuxostat, and colchicine for the treatment of gout.痛风患者起始使用别嘌醇、非布司他和秋水仙碱治疗的临床和医疗保健使用特征。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Dec;65(12):2008-14. doi: 10.1002/acr.22067.
5
Hypertension and the risk of incident gout in a population-based study: the atherosclerosis risk in communities cohort.基于人群的研究中高血压与痛风事件风险的关系:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究队列。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Oct;14(10):675-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00674.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis.2012年美国风湿病学会痛风管理指南。第2部分:急性痛风性关节炎的治疗与抗炎预防
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Oct;64(10):1447-61. doi: 10.1002/acr.21773.
7
2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia.2012年美国风湿病学会痛风管理指南。第1部分:高尿酸血症的系统性非药物和药物治疗方法。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Oct;64(10):1431-46. doi: 10.1002/acr.21772.
8
Hospital admissions associated with gout and their comorbidities in New Zealand and England 1999-2009.1999-2009 年新西兰和英国痛风住院患者及其合并症分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jan;52(1):118-26. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes253. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
9
Gout and its comorbidities: implications for therapy.痛风及其合并症:对治疗的影响。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jan;52(1):34-44. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes211. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Comparison of patient characteristics and gout-related health-care resource utilization and costs in patients with frequent versus infrequent gouty arthritis attacks.比较频繁发作与偶发痛风性关节炎患者的患者特征、与痛风相关的医疗资源利用情况和医疗费用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Nov;51(11):2004-12. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes183. Epub 2012 Jul 23.