Mandalia P K, Stone M A, Davies M J, Khunti K, Carey M E
Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Nov;90(1069):638-42. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132865. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
The use of lay people to deliver education programmes for people with chronic conditions is a potential method of addressing healthcare staff capacity and increasing the cost efficiency of delivering education. This qualitative substudy is embedded within an equivalence trial (2008-2011 including development stage).
In the qualitative substudy, we aimed to elicit the views of key stakeholders (patients, educators) about using lay people to deliver education to people recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, alongside a healthcare professional educator with an equal role. In this way, we sought to explore perceptions about acceptability and also contribute to understanding the reasons underlying positive or negative quantitative findings from main trial.
We conducted 27 telephone interviews with a purposive sample of patients, lay educators and healthcare professional educators involved in the main trial. Thematic analysis of transcribed data was underpinned by the constant comparative approach and structured using Framework methodology.
Overall, the data suggested that the use of lay educators was acceptable to educators and patients. Perceived difference in knowledge levels between lay and healthcare professional educators did not appear to have an impact on perceived acceptability or the effectiveness of the education received. Additional themes explored were related to peer status of educators and feasibility. Some concerns were raised about lay educators with diabetes, transferring personal issues and about the impact of healthcare professional time taken up by mentoring and supporting lay educators.
Positive perceptions about the use of lay educators support the positive quantitative findings from the main trial. Acceptability is an important consideration in relation to implementation of the model of delivery studied. Concerns raised within the interviews should be considered in the design of training for lay educators.
ISRCTN 99350009.
利用非专业人员为慢性病患者提供教育项目是解决医护人员能力问题并提高教育成本效益的一种潜在方法。这项定性子研究嵌入在一项等效性试验(2008 - 2011年,包括开发阶段)中。
在定性子研究中,我们旨在了解关键利益相关者(患者、教育者)对于由非专业人员与具有同等作用的专业医护教育者一起为近期诊断出2型糖尿病的患者提供教育的看法。通过这种方式,我们试图探究对可接受性的认知,并有助于理解主要试验中定量研究结果呈阳性或阴性的原因。
我们对参与主要试验的患者、非专业教育者和专业医护教育者进行了有目的抽样的27次电话访谈。转录数据的主题分析采用持续比较法,并使用框架方法进行结构化分析。
总体而言,数据表明非专业教育者的使用得到了教育者和患者的认可。非专业教育者与专业医护教育者在知识水平上的感知差异似乎并未影响感知到的可接受性或所接受教育的有效性。探讨的其他主题与教育者的同伴地位和可行性有关。有人对患有糖尿病的非专业教育者传递个人问题以及专业医护人员指导和支持非专业教育者所占用的时间影响表示担忧。
对使用非专业教育者的积极看法支持了主要试验中的积极定量研究结果。在所研究的交付模式实施方面,可接受性是一个重要考虑因素。访谈中提出的担忧在非专业教育者培训设计中应予以考虑。
ISRCTN 99350009。