Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌中心诊断性乳腺钼靶检查中的二次评估

Second Opinion Assessment in Diagnostic Mammography at a Breast Cancer Centre.

作者信息

Lorenzen J, Finck-Wedel A K, Lisboa B, Adam G

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Aug;72(8):734-739. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315107.

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the importance of second opinion assessment for diagnostic mammography and sonography in a breast cancer centre. We analysed a total of 374 diagnostic mammographies and sonographies. All patients had previously undergone mammography and sonography examination in different external clinics, and the findings had been classified according to the BI-RADS system. All patients underwent additional sonography investigation in the outpatient department of our university clinic with additional mammography where necessary. The final diagnosis (histological clarification in 316 cases, follow-up in 58 cases) was compared with the BI-RADS classification made by the external clinics and by the university clinic, and the correlation between their findings and the final diagnosis was analysed. The final diagnosis yielded 146 benign lesions and 228 cancers. In 74 % of cases (277/374), the BI-RADS classification of the first assessment corresponded to that of the second assessment. 26/55 lesions (47 %) were upgraded at the second assessment from BI-RADS 3 to BI-RADS 4, and 71/186 findings (38 %) were downgraded at the second assessment from BI-RADS 4 to BI-RADS 3. The correlation between the initial diagnosis made in the external facilities and the final diagnosis was low (kappa: 0.263), but the correlation between the second opinion assessment and the final diagnosis was significantly (p < 0.001) higher (kappa: 0.765). The second assessment increased the sensitivity from 91 % (208/228) to 99 % (225/228) and the specificity from 32 % (46/146) to 74 % (108/146). 20 additional malignant lesions were only detected at the second assessment; however the second assessment also resulted in 3 additional false-negative findings. Surgical biopsy was prevented in 49 women after the second assessment. An independent second diagnostic evaluation can significantly improve the correlation between BI-RADS classification and the final diagnosis, resulting in a benefit for the patient.

摘要

这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在乳腺癌中心,二次诊断评估对乳腺钼靶和超声诊断的重要性。我们共分析了374例乳腺钼靶和超声诊断病例。所有患者此前均在不同的外部诊所接受过乳腺钼靶和超声检查,检查结果已根据BI-RADS系统进行分类。所有患者在我校门诊接受了额外的超声检查,必要时还进行了额外的乳腺钼靶检查。将最终诊断结果(316例组织学确诊,58例随访)与外部诊所和我校诊所做出的BI-RADS分类进行比较,并分析它们的检查结果与最终诊断之间的相关性。最终诊断结果显示有146例良性病变和228例癌症。在74%的病例(277/374)中,首次评估的BI-RADS分类与二次评估一致。26/55例病变(47%)在二次评估时从BI-RADS 3级升级为BI-RADS 4级,71/186例检查结果(38%)在二次评估时从BI-RADS 4级降级为BI-RADS 3级。外部机构做出的初始诊断与最终诊断之间的相关性较低(kappa值:0.263),但二次诊断评估与最终诊断之间的相关性显著更高(p < 0.001)(kappa值:0.765)。二次评估将敏感度从91%(208/228)提高到99%(225/228),将特异度从32%(46/146)提高到74%(108/146)。二次评估时仅检测出另外20例恶性病变;然而,二次评估也导致出现了3例假阴性结果。二次评估后,49名女性避免了手术活检。独立的二次诊断评估可显著提高BI-RADS分类与最终诊断之间的相关性,从而使患者受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验