Finlayson Catherine Scott, Chen Yu Ting, Fu Mei R
New York University College of Nursing , New York, New York.
J Palliat Med. 2015 Feb;18(2):176-86. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0222. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
Advances in cancer treatment present challenges to patients with metastatic cancer who have to make treatment decisions in the face of newer and more effective treatments. Patients' awareness of disease status has been an important factor in making treatment choices. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature from 1997-2014 to evaluate the evidence of the impact of patients' awareness of disease status on treatment preferences and quality of life among patients with metastatic cancer.
Nine major electronic databases were searched and 490 articles were retrieved; 15 met inclusion criteria. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
The overall quality of the included 15 quantitative studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of consistent conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of patients' awareness of disease status. The included studies conceptualized patients' awareness of disease status either as being informed or understanding one's disease prognosis. Significantly more patients who were aware of their disease status were less likely to choose life-extending treatment or measures. Mixed findings were shown regarding the impacts of patients' awareness of disease status on quality of life. Absence of qualitative studies limited the review's ability to critically synthesize the concept of awareness of disease status. Well-designed qualitative studies are needed to shed light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the concept to better capture the impact of patients' awareness of disease status on treatment preferences and quality of life.
癌症治疗的进展给转移性癌症患者带来了挑战,他们必须在面对更新、更有效的治疗方法时做出治疗决策。患者对疾病状况的认知一直是做出治疗选择的重要因素。我们对1997年至2014年发表的文献进行了系统综述,以评估转移性癌症患者对疾病状况的认知对治疗偏好和生活质量影响的证据。
检索了九个主要电子数据库,共检索到490篇文章;15篇符合纳入标准。使用既定的质量评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。
纳入的15项定量研究的总体质量是足够的。当前文献的一个关键局限性是缺乏对患者疾病状况认知概念的一致概念或操作定义。纳入的研究将患者对疾病状况的认知概念化为了解或知晓自己的疾病预后。明显更多知晓自身疾病状况的患者不太可能选择延长生命的治疗或措施。关于患者疾病状况认知对生活质量的影响,研究结果不一。缺乏定性研究限制了综述对疾病状况认知概念进行批判性综合的能力。需要精心设计的定性研究来阐明该概念的概念化和操作化,以便更好地了解患者疾病状况认知对治疗偏好和生活质量的影响。