Puppo P, Germinale F, De Rose A F
Clin Ter. 1989 Apr 30;129(2):113-21.
Eighty-two evaluable patients suffering from UTI were randomly treated with parenteral Aztreonam (1 g OD in cystitis and 1 g BID in pyelonephritis) or oral Norfloxacin (400 mg BID). Predisposing urological conditions were present in 75% and 78.5% respectively. Microbiological cultures at the end of treatment and at a follow-up visit after 4 weeks showed significantly better results among Aztreonam treated patients (microbiological cure: 97.5% vs 71.4%-p less than or equal to 0.005). Clinical cure was achieved in 97.5% and 71.4% respectively (p less than or equal to 0.001). A statistically significant difference was present only in patients treated for pyelonephritis (microbiological cure-AZT: 100%; NOR: 50%-p less than or equal to 0.0005) and not in those with cystitis (AZT: 95.0%; NOR: 83.3%). Side effects were rare in both treatments. Aztreonam seems to offer major advantages, when compared to Norfloxacin, in the treatment of UTI, especially when upper urinary tract is involved.
82例可评估的尿路感染患者被随机分为两组,分别接受静脉注射氨曲南(膀胱炎患者每日1克,肾盂肾炎患者每日2次,每次1克)或口服诺氟沙星(每日2次,每次400毫克)治疗。分别有75%和78.5%的患者存在泌尿系统易感因素。治疗结束时及4周后随访的微生物培养结果显示,氨曲南治疗组的效果明显更好(微生物学治愈率:97.5%对71.4%,p≤0.005)。临床治愈率分别为97.5%和71.4%(p≤0.001)。仅在肾盂肾炎患者中存在统计学显著差异(微生物学治愈率 - 氨曲南:100%;诺氟沙星:50%,p≤0.0005),而膀胱炎患者中无差异(氨曲南:95.0%;诺氟沙星:83.3%)。两种治疗的副作用都很少见。与诺氟沙星相比,氨曲南在治疗尿路感染方面似乎具有主要优势,尤其是在上尿路受累时。