Suppr超能文献

氨曲南与诺氟沙星:门诊及住院患者尿路感染治疗的对比研究

[Aztreonam vs norfloxacin: a comparative study of the treatment of urinary tract infections in ambulatory and hospitalized patients].

作者信息

Puppo P, Germinale F, De Rose A F

出版信息

Clin Ter. 1989 Apr 30;129(2):113-21.

PMID:2525996
Abstract

Eighty-two evaluable patients suffering from UTI were randomly treated with parenteral Aztreonam (1 g OD in cystitis and 1 g BID in pyelonephritis) or oral Norfloxacin (400 mg BID). Predisposing urological conditions were present in 75% and 78.5% respectively. Microbiological cultures at the end of treatment and at a follow-up visit after 4 weeks showed significantly better results among Aztreonam treated patients (microbiological cure: 97.5% vs 71.4%-p less than or equal to 0.005). Clinical cure was achieved in 97.5% and 71.4% respectively (p less than or equal to 0.001). A statistically significant difference was present only in patients treated for pyelonephritis (microbiological cure-AZT: 100%; NOR: 50%-p less than or equal to 0.0005) and not in those with cystitis (AZT: 95.0%; NOR: 83.3%). Side effects were rare in both treatments. Aztreonam seems to offer major advantages, when compared to Norfloxacin, in the treatment of UTI, especially when upper urinary tract is involved.

摘要

82例可评估的尿路感染患者被随机分为两组,分别接受静脉注射氨曲南(膀胱炎患者每日1克,肾盂肾炎患者每日2次,每次1克)或口服诺氟沙星(每日2次,每次400毫克)治疗。分别有75%和78.5%的患者存在泌尿系统易感因素。治疗结束时及4周后随访的微生物培养结果显示,氨曲南治疗组的效果明显更好(微生物学治愈率:97.5%对71.4%,p≤0.005)。临床治愈率分别为97.5%和71.4%(p≤0.001)。仅在肾盂肾炎患者中存在统计学显著差异(微生物学治愈率 - 氨曲南:100%;诺氟沙星:50%,p≤0.0005),而膀胱炎患者中无差异(氨曲南:95.0%;诺氟沙星:83.3%)。两种治疗的副作用都很少见。与诺氟沙星相比,氨曲南在治疗尿路感染方面似乎具有主要优势,尤其是在上尿路受累时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验