• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Efficacy and tolerability of brodimoprim od versus norfloxacin bid in the treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Scaglione F, Demartini G, Cocuzza C, Raschi S, Cogo R

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1995;15(3):121-5.

PMID:8847153
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of brodimoprim OD versus norfloxacin BID were studied in patients affected by bacterial urinary tract infections. The study was performed in 203 patients divided into two parallel randomized groups orally given either brodimoprim 400 mg OD on the first day followed by 200 mg OD for 2 days, or norfloxacin 400 mg BID respectively. The efficacy of treatment was evaluated by the bacterial cultures, tolerability, analysis of signs and symptoms, a complete physical examination and from laboratory data. The results showed that brodimoprim and norfloxacin in the majority of patients resulted in a reduction of fever and symptoms caused by the infective process. Of the 103 patients enrolled in the brodimoprim OD group, 99 had a complete course of therapy with a positive outcome. There was only one case of failed treatment and 3 cases which could not be evaluated because of voluntary interruption of treatment. Of the 100 patients treated with norfloxacin BID, 94 completed therapy with a positive clinical outcome and there were 4 cases of treatment failure. Thus the efficacy of brodimoprim OD appears comparable to that of norfloxacin BID in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of brodimoprim od versus norfloxacin bid in the treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1995;15(3):121-5.
2
Comparative study of norfloxacin and trimethoprim for the treatment of elderly patients with urinary tract infection.
N Z Med J. 1988 Aug 24;101(852):537-9.
3
Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 3 days of norfloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.单剂量环丙沙星与3天诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002 Jan;8(1):50-4.
4
Comparison of short-term treatment regimen of ciprofloxacin versus long-term treatment regimens of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or norfloxacin for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections: a randomized, multicentre, open-label, prospective study.环丙沙星短期治疗方案与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑或诺氟沙星长期治疗方案用于单纯性下尿路感染的比较:一项随机、多中心、开放标签的前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):840-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh414. Epub 2004 Sep 3.
5
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for the treatment of upper urinary tract infections: a double blind trial.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗上尿路感染的双盲试验
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1988;56:28-34.
6
The efficacy of norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections in Tikure Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.诺氟沙星在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提库雷安贝萨医院治疗尿路感染的疗效。
East Afr Med J. 1991 Nov;68(11):844-52.
7
A multicenter comparative trial of three-day norfloxacin vs ten-day sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.一项关于三日诺氟沙星与十日复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Oct;147(10):1760-2.
8
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections: a multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, comparative study.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染的多中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):108S-113S.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of brodimoprim in respiratory tract infections.溴莫普明治疗呼吸道感染的疗效和耐受性
J Chemother. 1993 Dec;5(6):517-20.
10
Norfloxacin versus nalidixic acid in the treatment of urinary tract infections.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1987 Jun;25(6):317-9.