Pérez-Losada Marcos, Høeg Jens T, Simon-Blecher Noa, Achituv Yair, Jones Diana, Crandall Keith A
CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão 4485-661, Portugal; Computational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA; Department of Invertebrate Zoology, US National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA.
Marine Biology Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Dec;81:147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
The Balanomorpha are the largest group of barnacles and rank among the most diverse, commonly encountered and ecologically important marine crustaceans in the world. Paradoxically, despite their relevance and extensive study for over 150years, their evolutionary relationships are still unresolved. Classical morphological systematics was often based on non-cladistic approaches, while modern phylogenetic studies suffer from severe undersampling of taxa and characters (both molecular and morphological). Here we present a phylogenetic analysis of the familial relationships within the Balanomorpha. We estimate divergence times and examine morphological diversity based on five genes, 156 specimens, 10 fossil calibrations, and six key morphological characters. Two balanomorphan superfamilies, eight families and twelve genera were identified as polyphyletic. Chthamaloids, chionelasmatoid and pachylasmatoids split first from the pedunculated ancestors followed by a clade of tetraclitoids and coronuloids, and most of the balanoids. The Balanomorpha split from the Verrucidae (outgroup) in the Lower Cretaceous (139.6 Mya) with all the main lineages, except Pachylasmatoidea, having emerged by the Paleocene (60.9 Mya). Various degrees of convergence were observed in all the assessed morphological characters except the maxillipeds, which suggests that classical interpretations of balanomorphan morphological evolution need to be revised and reinterpreted.
藤壶亚目是藤壶中最大的一个类群,也是世界上最多样化、最常见且在生态上最重要的海洋甲壳类动物之一。矛盾的是,尽管它们具有重要意义且已被广泛研究了150多年,但其进化关系仍未得到解决。经典形态分类学往往基于非分支分类法,而现代系统发育研究则受到分类单元和特征(分子和形态特征)严重抽样不足的困扰。在此,我们对藤壶亚目的科间关系进行了系统发育分析。我们基于五个基因、156个标本、10个化石校准点和六个关键形态特征估计了分歧时间,并研究了形态多样性。两个藤壶亚目总科、八个科和十二个属被确定为多系类群。矮藤壶类、拟小藤壶类和厚藤壶类首先从有柄祖先中分化出来,随后是四齿藤壶类和龟藤壶类以及大多数藤壶类的一个分支。藤壶亚目在白垩纪早期(1.396亿年前)从围胸目(外类群)分化出来,除厚藤壶总科外,所有主要谱系在古新世(6090万年前)已经出现。除颚足外,在所有评估形态特征中均观察到不同程度的趋同现象,这表明对藤壶亚目形态进化的经典解释需要修订和重新解读。