Andreou Andreas, Gül Safak, Pascher Andreas, Schöning Wenzel, Al-Abadi Hussein, Bahra Marcus, Klein Fritz, Denecke Timm, Strücker Benjamin, Puhl Gero, Pratschke Johann, Seehofer Daniel
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Feb;17(2):168-75. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12345. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria are not considered for liver transplantation (LT) in many centres; however, LT may be the only treatment able to achieve long-term survival in patients with unresectable HCC. The aim of this study was to assess the role of recipient age and tumour biology expressed by the DNA index in the selection of HCC patients for LT.
Clinicopathological data of 364 patients with HCC who underwent LT between 1989 and 2010 were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was analysed by patient age, tumour burden based on Milan criteria and the DNA index.
After a median follow-up time of 78 months, the median survival was 100 months. Factors associated with OS on univariate analysis included Milan criteria, patient age, hepatitis C infection, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, the DNA index, number of HCC, diameter of HCC, bilobar HCC, microvascular tumour invasion and tumour grading. On multivariate analysis, HCC beyond Milan criteria and the DNA index >1.5 independently predicted a worse OS. When stratifying patients by both age and Milan criteria, patients ≤ 60 years with HCC beyond Milan criteria had an OS comparable to that of patients >60 years within Milan criteria (10-year OS: 33% versus 37%, P = 0.08). Patients ≤ 60 years with HCC beyond Milan criteria but a favourable DNA index ≤ 1.5 achieved excellent long-term outcomes, comparable with those of patients within Milan criteria.
Patients ≤ 60 years may undergo LT for HCC with favourable outcomes independently of their tumour burden. Additional assessment of tumour biology, e.g. using the DNA index, especially in this subgroup of patients can support the selection of LT candidates who may derive the most long-term survival benefit, even if Milan criteria are not fulfilled.
在许多中心,超出米兰标准的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者不被考虑进行肝移植(LT);然而,LT可能是无法切除的HCC患者实现长期生存的唯一治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估受者年龄和DNA指数所表达的肿瘤生物学特性在HCC患者LT选择中的作用。
对1989年至2010年间接受LT的364例HCC患者的临床病理数据进行评估。通过患者年龄、基于米兰标准的肿瘤负荷和DNA指数分析总生存(OS)情况。
中位随访时间78个月后,中位生存期为100个月。单因素分析中与OS相关的因素包括米兰标准、患者年龄、丙型肝炎感染、甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平、DNA指数、HCC数量、HCC直径、双侧HCC、微血管肿瘤侵犯和肿瘤分级。多因素分析中,超出米兰标准的HCC和DNA指数>1.5独立预测较差的OS。按年龄和米兰标准对患者进行分层时,≤60岁且超出米兰标准的HCC患者的OS与>60岁且符合米兰标准的患者相当(10年OS:33%对37%,P = 0.08)。≤60岁且超出米兰标准但DNA指数≤1.5且预后良好的患者取得了优异的长期结局,与符合米兰标准的患者相当。
≤60岁的患者可能接受HCC的LT,无论其肿瘤负荷如何,均可获得良好结局。对肿瘤生物学特性进行额外评估,例如使用DNA指数,特别是在这一亚组患者中,可有助于选择可能从LT中获得最大长期生存益处的候选者——即使不符合米兰标准。